Attenuation of Sound in a Low Mach Number Nozzle Flow [PDF]

Crocco's form of the momen- tum equation av. $+. VB = -x. (2.6). (Liepmann & Roshko ..... (3.23) may be regarded as

3 downloads 12 Views 3MB Size

Recommend Stories


High Subsonic Mach Number Flow Characterization
If you feel beautiful, then you are. Even if you don't, you still are. Terri Guillemets

Flow at low Reynolds number
The greatest of richness is the richness of the soul. Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)

The mathematical theory of low Mach number flows
So many books, so little time. Frank Zappa

LOW MACH NUMBER MODELING OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE. III. REACTIONS
If your life's work can be accomplished in your lifetime, you're not thinking big enough. Wes Jacks

LOW MACH NUMBER LIMIT OF SOME STAGGERED SCHEMES FOR COMPRESSIBLE
It always seems impossible until it is done. Nelson Mandela

Laval nozzle flow calculation
Knock, And He'll open the door. Vanish, And He'll make you shine like the sun. Fall, And He'll raise

Armstrong ASME Flow Nozzle
Be who you needed when you were younger. Anonymous

Improved Flux Formulations for Unsteady Low Mach Number Flows
Come let us be friends for once. Let us make life easy on us. Let us be loved ones and lovers. The earth

On a low Mach nuclear core model
Ask yourself: How could I be more engaged in life? Next

Idea Transcript


https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19790009489 2018-04-16T04:18:52+00:00Z

NASA

Contractor

Report

3086

Attenuation of Sound in a Low Mach Number Nozzle Flow

M.

S. Howe

CONTRACT FEBRUARY

NASl-14611-12 1979

NASA

Contractor

Report

3086

Attenuation of Sound in a Low Mach Number Nozzle Flow

M. S. Howe Bolt Berunek and Newman Cambria’ge, Massachusetts

Prepared for Langley Research Center NASl-14611-12 under Contract

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Office 1979

Inc.

TABLE

OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.

THE RADIATION OF INTERNALLY GENERATED SOUND FROM A LOW MACH NUMBER NOZZLE FLOW ...................... Formulation of the Problem .................... 2.1 2.2 Energy Flux i4ithin the Jet Pipe ................ The Free Space Radiation 2.3 ......................

5 5 8 10

3.

THE FLUX OF ENERGY THROUGH THE NOZZLE .............. The Reflection Coefficient .................... 3.1 3.2 The Mechanism of Hydrodynamic Attenuation Exterior Flow Models .......................... 3.3

13 13 17 21

.....

2

4.

THE RADIATED SOUND POWER: COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

APPENDIX:

Compact Green's Function for an Axi-Symmetric Nozzle ........................ Incompressible Pulsatile Nozzle Flow ........ The Case of a Finite Width Shear Layer ......

33 35 38

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

iii

LIST

Figure

1.

2.

OF FIGURES

Schematic illustration of the considered in the analysis of of low frequency sound from a the presence of a mean nozzle

configuration the emission jet pipe in flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Predicted field shape characteristics for vortex Case I ka = 0.24 and MJ = 0.3; finite width shear sheet model; Case II -----layer model; angle 8 is mea:ured from the downstream direction of the jet axis, and the experimental points are taken from Pinker and Bryce (1976): A - ka = 0.24; 0 - ka = 0.6 at MJ = 0.3

6

27

3.

Measured ratio of the far field sound power WF to the nozzle power flux WT as a function of the nozzle exit Helmholtz number ka for various values of the jet Mach number MJ (Bechert, et al., 1977) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

4.

Comparison of predicted and measured ratio WF/WT as a function of ka for MJ = 0.3. 0 0 0 (Bechert, et aZ., 1977); Experiment: sheet model, Case I, vortex Theory: finite width shear layer -------Case II, model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

iv

SUMMARY

This report examines the energy conversion mechanisms which govern the emission of low frequency sound from an axisymmetric jet pipe of arbitrary nozzle contraction ratio in the case of low Mach number nozzle flow. The incident acoustic'energy which escapes from the nozzle is partitioned between two distinct disturbances in the exterior fluid. The first of these is the free space radiation, whose directivity is equivalent to that produced by monopole and dipole sources. Second, essentially incompressible vortex waves are excited by the shedding of vorticity from the nozzle lip, and may be Two associated with the large scale instabilities of the jet. linearized theoretical models are discussed. One of these is an exact linear theory in which the boundary of the jet is treated as an unstable vortex sheet. The second assumes that the finite width of the mean shear layer of the real jet cannot be neglected. The analytical results are shown to compare favorably with recent attenuation measurements.

-

INTRODUCTION

This report examines the energy conversion mechanisms involved in the emission of sound from the interior of a jet pipe in the presence of a subsonic nozzle flow. This is particularly relevant to the problem of "excess" or "core" noise produced by unsteady combustion and turbine blading in the jet pipe of an aeroengine. It is also of interest in connection with the energy balance associated with the generation of resonant oscillations in the pipe and in musical instruments such as the flute. According to experiments of Crow (1972) and of Gerend, Kumasaki and Roundhill (1973), upstream generated sound is significantly amplified by passage through the jet at subsonic velocities, the additional radiation being attributed to the excitation of instability waves of the jet. This conclusion has been challenged by Moore (1977) and by Bechert, Michel and Pfizenmaier (1977) who pointed out that it was based on measurements of the acoustic intensity at a single far field location. In a series of carefully conducted experiments Moore demonstrated that over a wide frequency range and for jet Mach numbers lying between 0.1 - 0.9, there is no significant overall radiation from the instability mode at the excitation frequency. This question was investigated by Bechert, Michel and Pfizenmaier (1977) using an acoustic tone generated within the jet pipe by means of a system of matched loudspeakers. Although their experiment was confined to the case of a cold subsonic jet, which precluded a strict comparison with the earlier work, the absence of amplification at the tonal freMoreover, at sufficiently low acoustic quency was confirmed. frequencies, specifically for Helmholtz numbers ka less than unity - k being the acoustic wavenumber and a the nozzle exit radius - a considerable attenuation of the tone was observed during its emission through the nozzle flow into also reported by Moore (1977), and free space, an effect A high level of amounted to 15 dB or more for ka - 0.2. tonal excitation is known to bring about an overall increase in the broadband noise produced by the jet [Bechert and Pfizenmaier (1975a), Moore (1977)], but Bechert et aZ. (1977) were able to show that this additional radiation in no way compensates for the strong attenuation of the tone, the relationship between the broadband amplification and the excitation amplitude being essentially nonlinear.

2

Munt (1977) has described in detail a linearized analytical theory of the radiation of sound from a circular cylindrical pipe in the presence of a subsonic nozzle flow. The jet shear layer was approximated by an infinitely thin cylindrical vortex sheet, and free space radiation directivities calculated from this model were shown to be in excellent agreement with field shape data obtained by Pinker and Bryce (1976) using a jet pipe with a conical nozzle. This led Bechert, Michel and Pfizenmaier (1977) to suggest that the same theory could well account for the attenuation observed in their experiment at low frequencies. In this report we shall verify that this is indeed the case. No direct use will be made of Munt's formulae, however, since, although valid over a wide range of conditions, they offer no insight into the nature of the physical mechanisms which are called into play during the passage of an acoustic disturbance through the nozzle. The interaction of an acoustic tone with low Mach number nozzle flow has been studied in relation to laminar-turbulent transition in a separated boundary layer. Brown (1935) and the experiments of Freymuth (1966) indicate that the influence of the sound on the free shear layer of the jet is restricted to the region close to the nozzle lip. Bechert and Pfizenmaier (1975b) examined the nature of the flow near the lip, and concluded that at sufficiently small Strouhal numbers based on boundary layer width, the disturbed flow leaves the trailing edge tangentially, in accordance with the KuttaJoukowski hypothesis. We shall argue below that an attenuation of the acoustic field is necessary in order to energize the essentially incompressible, unsteady flow associated with the vorticity that must be shed from the lip to satisfy the This may involve the growth of spatial Kutta condition. instabilities of the jet, and in this case the attenuation may be regarded as being necessary to maintain the corresponding shed vorticity structures'. Of course, large scale 'coherent and instability waves are known to produce sound by their but at low frequencies subsequent interaction with the nozzle, the radiated sound power is of order MJ(ka), relative to the power loss from the incident sound wave, MJ being the Mach This is accordingly a situation in which number of the jet. the production of aerodynamic quadrupole sources (Lighthill in the form of initially organized vertical distur19521, in an overall reduction in the acoustic energy! bances, results All available theories of jet-acoustic interaction (e.g., sheet Crighton 1972; Savkar 1975; Munt 1977) employ a vortex representation of the free shear layer and impose the Kutta The Strouhal numbers of interest in the present condition. discussion are sufficiently small to justify the application 3

However, the experiments of Pinker and of this condition. Bryce (1976) and the results reported by Savkar (1975) indicate that there is no significant excitation of the instability mode for a cold jet operating at low subsonic Mach numbers. This suggests that it may be necessary to take account of the finite width of the mean shear layer, and indeed it may be argued that Pinker and Bryce's experimental results reveal that close to the nozzle lip, the radial length scale of the unsteady shed vorticity is much smaller than that of the shear layer. In this report the attenuation of the sound will be discussed in terms of Lighthill's (1952) acoustic analogy theory of aerodynamic sound by means of the formulation proposed by the author (Howe 1975). It will be assumed that the acoustic wavelength is large compared with the radius of the jet pipe, and this will enable the analysis to take account of an arbitrary contraction in the cross-sectional area of the pipe at the nozzle. The general problem is formulated in Sec. 2 and the characteristics of the free space radiation field are deduced. The mechanism of energy transfer to the essentially incompressible vortex motions of the jet is described in Sec. 3; specific details are given for an exterior shear flow modelled by a vortex sheet, and also for an approximate treatment of the case of finite shear layer width (Sec. 4). The predictions of the analysis are discussed in relation to the experiments of Pinker & Bryce (1976) and Bechert, Michel & Pfizenmaier (1977). Various analytical results are collected together in an appendix.

4

THE RADIATION

OF INTERNALLY

GENERATED

FROM A LOW MACH NUMBER NOZZLE Formulation

of

the

SOUND

FLOW

Problem

An axi-symmetric air-jet of density p1 and sound speed c1 exhausts from a jet pipe of cross-sectional area A through a nozzle of area A into a stationary ambient medium of density (Fig. 1). The and sound speed respectively equal to p Mach number of the flow is taken to be &fi!ciently small that This will be the case variations in p,, cl, may be neglected. if the steady upstream flow velocity U and the nozzle exit velocity UJ satisfy M2, MJ2 C-C 1, where Mach numbers M, MJ are defined by M = U/c.

1

, MJ = UJ,/C1

Dissipation processes will uniform upstream conditions there may be a variation in the mean shear layer of the

(2.1)

also the the jet.

be neglected, so that for flow is homentropic, although specific entropy s across

A plane harmonic sound wave is incident on the nozzle It is required to determine exit from within the jet pipe. the relation between the flux WT, say, of acoustic energy through the control surface C through the nozzle, i.e., located just upstream of the contraction, and the total into the ambient medium. Let PI acoustic power WF radiated denote the amplitude of the incident wave, such that in the upstream region the incident pressure perturbation is given by the real part of klxl ' i 1+M P = PI e1

- wt >

In this expression w is the radian direction the time, and the positive rectangular coordinate system (x1, the origin being located mean flow, nozzle-exit plane. tion

The velocity both within

(2.2)

frequency, k, =-w/cl, t is of the xl-axis of a x2, x3) is parallel to the in the center of the

u of the mean flow is a function of posithe nozzle and in the exterior fluid, and 5

FIG.

1.

SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION OF THE CONFIGURATION CONSIDERED OF THE EMISSION OF LOW FREQUENCY SOUND FROM A JET PIPE OF A MEAN NOZZLE FLOW.

IN THE ANALYSIS IN THE PRESENCE

in this case the Lighthill (1952) acoustic analogy theory of aerodynamic sound assumes a convenient form when the stagnathan the pressure, is taken as the tion enthalpy B, rather The stagnation enthalpy is fundamental acoustic variable. given in terms of the velocity y and the specific enthalpy h by B =h+$v2

.

(2.3)

In the absence of dissipative wave equation of the acoustic

{&(-j!&)+

$2.

processes the inhomogeneous analogy theory becomes

V-V2}

B=div~--$:.x

(2.4)

where x = :JJ

- TVs

(2.5)

3

g = curl D/Dt = a/at + y-a/a?, the temperature (Howe 1975).

y is

the

vorticity,

and T is

The terms on the right of (2.4) vanish identically except The fluid is hornentropic in in the shear layer of the jet. the ambient medium and within and upstream of the potential In those regions the pressure is a function core of the jet. and the specific enthalpy h may be of the density alone,

identifed with tum equation av $+

I

dp/p.

Similarly,

Crocco's

VB = -x

of the momen-

(2.6)

193) reduces to the statement outside of the jet mixing

(Liepmann & Roshko 1957, p. that the flow is irrotational region, with B =Bn-$$

form

(n =

0,

1)

l

(2.7)

7

Here 4 is the respectively medium and in the acoustic PC %

where

perturbation velocity potential, and Bn takes constant values B,, B,, say, in the ambient In free space the potential region of the jet. pressure p is given by

B’

(2.8)

B' = B - B,.

It follows from these remarks that when the mean flow is disturbed by the incident wave (2.2), a linearized description of the subsequent motion in the potential regions is obtained by setting the variable coefficients of the wave operator on the left of (2.4) equal to their local undisturbed to unity are also When terms of O(MJ2) relative mean values. discarded the propagation of small disturbances may be taken to be described by the convected wave equation

i

11 Cl

a + U.2 2 - a2 I at ) ( axjZ

axj

(2.9)

B=O

j

in the potential

1

a? ---co2 at2 in the

7

ambient

region a2 axs2 7

of the

B=O

jet,

and by

,

(2.10)

medium. Energy

Flux

Within

the

Jet

Pipe

The flux of acoustic energy through the 1) into the nozzle may be calculated C (Fig. formula WT = A

Pl

for

]y]>>a

(ii)

within the Fig. 1,

= 0.6133a being c rcular cylindrical

2

in

free

nozzle

K(x) are harmonic, and satisfy the GaV(FA, 5) = 0 on the walls of the unit normal. In particular, an axi-symmetric incompressible the coordinate origin in the center as in the main text, is normalized space

in the vicinity

the "end-correction" pipe (Noble, 1958,

of the

point

N of

of a semi-infinite page 138);

33

(iii)

upstream F*(Y)

where given

of the

nozzle

2 Y, - Z+

contraction

J

X is the effective, approximately by

geometric

nozzle

end correction

(A.21

A being the length of the neck of the nozzle, and L the axial distance over which the contraction occurs (Rayleigh 1945, Sec. 308). The vector properties: (i>

for

valued

IyI

>> a in free

K(Y) w .

(ii)

N- y,

in the K(y) v s

vicinity Yl

following

nozzle ;

of the -

the precise forms of the required in applications In the nozzle, the be modified

has the

space

= constant

=

K(y)

;

IYll >> a in the

for

K(y) w 5 (iii)

function

;

nozzle

F&l,

exit

F&)’

F&l

:

potential functions FB, FG are not to axi-symmetric source distributions.

presence of a low Mach number mean flow from the representation (A.l) of the Green's function must to read:

G(x,y,t,T) - w

F .h

6 t - T -

i (A.31 34

In this expression the additional factor (l+M), where M = U/c,, accounts for the convection of the "imploding" wave by the mean flow upstream of the nozzle contraction. Incompressible

Pulsatile

Nozzle

Flow

The potential Y(x)eeiwt E [F (x) + FJ(x)]eeiWt which describes incompressible pulsatili Flow in the downstream portion of the nozzle in the presence of a mean flow may be estimated from the corresponding solution for a semi-infinite, circular cylindrical duct. In the case in which the shear layer of the exterior jet flow is modeled by a linearly disturbed vortex sheet, the Wiener-Hopf procedure described by Munt (1977) for the compressible problem yields for the solution in which the Kutta condition is imposed:

Y (xl

=

I

lim --2 E++o 2 1

‘EXl

7

+

&

/

-03

o-iEUJ)F(k,r)K+(iE)K_(k) kl (w-UJk)Z+(is)Z_(k) I

e

ikxl

(A.4)

where (r < a)

F (k,r 1 = I,(lklr)/I,(lkla) = -

w-UJk)K1(lk\a)

UK, (I+)/(

(A.51

(r > a)

and the first term in the brace brackets of (A.4) is omitted Kn when r > a. Here and elsewhere lkl = Jk' + ez and I are modified Bessel Functions of order n (Abramowitz &d 1964, p. 374). Stegun, The various quantities appearing in these formulae are A function f(k) which is regular and defined as follows. non-zero on the real k-axis defines func.zions f? (k) respectively regular and non-zero in Im k < 0 by means of

f,(k)

= exp -co

In f(5) 6-k

'5

(A.61

35

dk I

provided (Noble,

that 1958,

the integral page 13).

The functions K(k)

exists

in an appropriate

K, Z are given

la 1

= 21,(Ikja)K,(lk

by

I

I,(lk]a)K,(lkla) il

sense

+ I,(lkla)K,

(Ikla)

- '3' (A.'la,b)

As x1 -t -a within the circular cylindrical duct the principal contribution to the integral in (A.4) is from a simple pole at k = -is. This yields the approximate form Y close to the point N of the nozzle of Fig. 1, viz:

Now as

E

+

0

K+(iE)K-(GE)

= 1 - 2&R,

where R = 0.6133a is the cal pip: (Noble 1958, p. i.e., flow that 1960). as k

,

end correction 138).

(A.91 of a circular

cylindri-

The solution (A-4) will satisfy the causality condition, the condition that the fluctuations in the exterior are a consequence of the pulsating nozzle flow, provided it is regular in an upper complex w-plane (Lighthill, For Imw w +m the dispersion function Z(k) + l/2 + f 03 on the real axis and Z+(iE)Z-(-is)

36

of

= exp

In Z(k)*dkl kL + E'-

I

(A.lO)

The result for real w is obtained by analytic continuation, and as w approaches the positive real axis, say, the zero function Z(k) which corresponds to k= k of the dispersion the i&stability mode of the semi-infinite jet crosses the real k-axis from the first quadrant into the fourth quadrant. Deforming the contour in (A.lO) to take account of this, and comparing the result with the integral along the real k-axis, we find that for real, positive w Zn Z(k)dk = exp I&Y k2 I -00

Z+(iE)Z-(-ie)

+

(A.ll)

The integral here is split into real and imaginary parts by noting that as Imw + +0 the argument of Z(k) decreases discontinuously by 2?'r as k increases through k = w/UJ, and in this way we find that for small E m

Z+(iE)z-

(-iE)

1

Substitution value Y

of

AI = ^I

x

2ieUJ

exp I 5

=

(A.9),

I-

w

J

(A.12)

into

uJ Lo - T(

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.