Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in the United States - University of [PDF]

Cancer after Kidney Transplantation. Table 4: Age-adjusted rate ratios for cancer in transplantation recipients compared

0 downloads 5 Views 88KB Size

Recommend Stories


Vesicoureteral reflux after kidney transplantation in children
Raise your words, not voice. It is rain that grows flowers, not thunder. Rumi

PDF Kidney Transplantation
You have to expect things of yourself before you can do them. Michael Jordan

The latest in kidney transplantation
Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. Matsuo Basho

Imaging in Kidney Transplantation
Don't watch the clock, do what it does. Keep Going. Sam Levenson

Kidney Transplantation
Make yourself a priority once in a while. It's not selfish. It's necessary. Anonymous

kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death
No amount of guilt can solve the past, and no amount of anxiety can change the future. Anonymous

in the united states
Raise your words, not voice. It is rain that grows flowers, not thunder. Rumi

Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States
Life is not meant to be easy, my child; but take courage: it can be delightful. George Bernard Shaw

Cell Therapy in Kidney Transplantation
We must be willing to let go of the life we have planned, so as to have the life that is waiting for

Successful Dual Kidney Transplantation After Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion of Discarded
This being human is a guest house. Every morning is a new arrival. A joy, a depression, a meanness,

Idea Transcript


C Blackwell Munksgaard 2004 Copyright 

American Journal of Transplantation 2004; 4: 905–913 Blackwell Munksgaard

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00450.x

Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in the United States Bertram L. Kasiskea,b,c,∗ , Jon J. Snyderc , David T. Gilbertsonc and Changchun Wangc a

Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN b Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN c United States Renal Data System, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN ∗ Corresponding author: Bertram L. Kasiske, [email protected] Previous reports of cancer after kidney transplantation have been limited by small numbers of patients in single-center studies and incomplete ascertainment of cases in large registries. We examined rates of malignancies among first-time recipients of deceased or living donor kidney transplantations in 1995–2001 (n = 35 765) using Medicare billing claims. For most common tumors, e.g. colon, lung, prostate, stomach, esophagus, pancreas, ovary and breast, cancer rates were roughly twofold higher after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Melanoma, leukemia, hepatobiliary tumors, cervical and vulvovaginal tumors were each approximately fivefold more common. Testicular and bladder cancers were increased approximately threefold, while kidney cancer was approximately 15-fold more common. Kaposi’s sarcoma, non-Hogkin’s lymphomas, and nonmelanoma skin cancers were more than 20-fold increased than in the general population. Compared with patients on the waiting list, several tumors were more common after transplantation (p < 0.01): nonmelanoma skin cancers (2.6-fold), melanoma (2.2-fold), Kaposi’s sarcoma (9.0-fold), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (3.3-fold), cancer of the mouth (2.2-fold), and cancer of the kidney (39% higher). The rates for most malignancies are higher after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Cancer should continue to be a major focus of prevention in kidney transplantation.

Introduction Long-term complications of kidney transplantation have assumed increasing importance as short-term patient and graft survival have improved. There are reasons to believe that cancer should be more common after kidney transplantation than in the general population, and more common than in comparable patients on dialysis. Immunosuppressive agents may cause DNA damage and interfere with normal DNA repair mechanisms. In addition, a number of cancers have been linked to viral infections that are common after transplantation. Finally, immune surveillance, which ordinarily prevents the growth and development of malignancies, may be impaired by immunosuppressive medications. It is difficult to precisely ascertain the incidence of most tumors, and to compare their rates of occurrence with those in the general population, using data from small, singlecenter studies. There have been few reports on the incidence of cancer from transplant registries (1–5). Reporting of cancer to registries is often incomplete, and the extent that registry data underestimate the true incidence of cancer is difficult to determine. We linked data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) to Medicare billing claims to detect the occurrence of cancers after kidney transplantation. In the USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report, we reported the 3-year incidences of most major post-transplant malignancies, some of the clinical correlates to cancer after transplantation, and the associations between cancer and outcomes (6). In the present report, we compare sex-specific rates of cancer after transplantation with those in the general US population, adjusting for age. We also compare rates of cancer in kidney transplant recipients with rates among comparable patients on the deceased donor waiting list.

Methods Ascertaining the occurrence of cancer

Key words: Hemodialysis, malignancies, United Network for Organ Sharing, United States Renal Data System, waiting list Received 25 October 2003, revised and accepted for publication 13 February 2004

To identify patients with cancer, Medicare claims were searched for the appropriate ICD-9-CM codes (Appendix). Patients were classified as having a specific malignancy if one inpatient (Part A) or two outpatient/Part B Medicare claims were found within 1 year of each other. This method has been validated for identifying diabetes (7). To validate this technique for cancers, we compared Medicare claims with the results of a survey of Medicare beneficiaries conducted in 1992. Using one Part A or two outpatient/Part B

905

Kasiske et al. claims within 1 year predicted the results of the survey with reasonable positive predictive values (PPV; the proportion of claimants found to have cancer in the survey) and negative predictive values (NPV; the proportion without claims found not to have cancer in the survey). For skin cancer these were 81% (PPV) and 85% (NPV), for prostate in men 61% and 97%, for lung 71% and 100%, for breast in women 87% and 95%, for kidney 79% and 100%, for ovarian in women 40% and 99%, for stomach 67% and 99%, for uterine in women 50% and 97%, for cervical in women 43% and 99%, and for bladder 72% and 99%, respectively. To ensure a high likelihood that cancer would be detected, patients were censored at either: (1) loss of Medicare primary coverage, (2) 3 years after transplantation, (3) 12/31/2001, or (4) death.

Determining the incidence of cancer after transplantation For this analysis, we used first-time recipients of deceased or living donor kidney transplantations between 1995 and 2001 with known age at the time of transplantation. Patients with other organ transplants were excluded. All patients had Medicare as the primary payer at the time of transplantation. This latter determination was made by first identifying that Medicare was the primary payer for the transplantation itself, through Medicare billing data. Then the Medicare enrollment database was searched to determine Medicare Part A and Part B primary pay status along with coverage start and stop dates. There were 35 765 (47%) fulfilling these criteria out of a total of 76 467 first transplantations between 1995 and 2001. Three-year, cumulative incidences were estimated from a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusting for variables recorded at the time of transplantation: age, gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, primary cause of renal failure, year of transplantation, donor type, hepatitis B & C serology, education level, employment status, time on dialysis, donor age, donor gender, donor race, HLA mismatches, recipient–donor body surface area matching, body mass index, panel reactive antibodies, cytomegalovirus matching, baseline maintenance immunosuppression (cyclosporine, microemulsion cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil), as well as monoclonal, polyclonal, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for induction.

Comparing cancer after transplantation with cancer in the US population Estimates of cancer incidence rates in the general US population were obtained from the United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 Incidence report published by the United States Cancer Statistics Working Group (8). Crude first-, second-, and third-year post-transplantation cancer incidence rates were calculated for male and female recipients, and rates from both the general population and the transplantation population were age-adjusted to the 2000 census population. For each tumor type we calculated a rate ratio by dividing the incidence rate for the transplant patients by the rate for the general population. Statistical tests of differences were not calculated.

Comparing cancer after transplantation with the waiting list To calculate the relative risk for cancer associated with transplantation vs. comparable end-stage kidney disease patients without transplantation, we compared recipients with patients who were on the waiting list. This analysis included 42 201 patients who were placed on the United Network for Organ Sharing list for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Of these, 20 183 were listed and ultimately transplanted (with either a deceased donor or a living donor kidney), while 22 018 remained on the waiting list without receiving a transplant. In addition, we included 3905 patients who were preemptively transplanted, i.e. before being placed on the list. Altogether there were 46 106 patients included in this analysis. This analysis was also restricted to those patients who were Medicare primary pay at the time of listing or preemptive transplantation.

906

The relative risk of cancer after transplantation compared with the waiting list was assessed using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients were censored at the loss of Medicare primary payer status, death, 3 years post-transplant, or on December 31, 2001. Transplantation status was considered a time-dependent covariate. Patients who were preemptively transplanted were included in the transplantation group from the initiation of their follow-up period.

Results Incidence and clinical correlates of cancer after kidney transplantation The cumulative incidence of any nonskin malignancy (but including melanoma) after kidney transplantation was 1.2%, 1.9%, 3.3%, 5.5%, and 7.5% at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36, respectively (Table 1). The cumulative incidence of skin cancer (excluding melanoma) was 0.3%, 0.9%, 2.3%, 5.0%, and 7.4% at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (Table 1).

Table 1: Cumulative incidences of malignancies at 1, 2 and 3 years after transplantation (%) Type of malignancy Skin Skin Melanoma Gastrointestinal Colon Esophagus Hepatobiliary Pancreas Small intestine Stomach Genitourinary Bladder Cervix (women) Kidney Ovary (women) Prostate (men) Testes (men) Uterus (women) Vulvovaginal (women) Lymphomas Hodgkin’s Non-Hodgkin’s Other Bone Breast (women) Breast (men) CNS Endocrine Kaposi’s sarcoma Larynx Leukemia Lung Mouth Myeloma Other Any non-skin

1 year

2 year

3 year

2.25 0.09

4.95 0.19

7.43 0.32

0.18 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.05

0.33 0.03 0.16 0.07 0.02 0.08

0.51 0.07 0.22 0.10 0.03 0.11

0.16 0.02 0.54 0.04 0.70 0.02 0.07 0.03

0.26 0.09 0.82 0.09 1.28 0.04 0.13 0.05

0.32 0.18 1.01 0.14 1.74 0.06 0.18 0.09

0.04 0.53

0.05 0.81

0.08 1.02

0.04 0.46 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.02 0.14 0.22 0.13 0.10 0.66 3.27

0.06 0.80 0.04 0.20 0.17 0.12 0.03 0.19 0.41 0.22 0.15 1.43 5.52

0.10 1.05 0.05 0.29 0.21 0.14 0.07 0.25 0.69 0.32 0.19 2.10 7.45

American Journal of Transplantation 2004; 4: 905–913

Cancer after Kidney Transplantation Table 2: Major risk factors for malignancies after kidney transplantation∗ Non-skin malignancy Risk factor Year of transplantation 1999–01 vs. 1995–98 Age at transplantation 0–17 years 18–34 years (reference) 35–49 years 50–64 years 65 years and older Sex Men vs. women Race Caucasian (reference) African American Asian Other Ethnicity Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic Primary cause of renal failure Diabetes Glomerulonephritis (reference) Hypertension Cystic kidney disease Other Dialysis before transplantation None (pre-emptive) Up to 1 year (reference) 1 up to 2 years 2 up to 3 years 3 or more years Body mass index

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.