Idea Transcript
99
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
! "
!
!
#$ %
#$ &
' (
'
*
!
'
!
!
)
!
)
) !
!
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
100
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
+
)
)
, )
. / ) 0
/
)
(
11
11
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
101
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
2
" , *
!
! 3
4
5
0
!
6
#7 %8
9 : %
) !
2 :
) " !
: /
1
Ross (1930), 75.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
:
)
102
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
. 0
;
) )
)
@
?
?
: A /
)
B C C, %D)
C
&
) :
6 8
)
:
)
2
Kagan (1998), 290.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
103
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
?
)
E
!
!
( A
:
/
CB !
! =
' !
!
:
7
!
(
3
Moore (1903), 187. For Moore’s isolation version of the essential value test the relevant worlds are any in which the pain occurs.
4
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
104
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
!
!
!
-
!
,
! 0
0
*
!
<
: 0 :
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
0
<
<
105
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
3
,
-
1
:
,
, 0
,
: $
5
This restriction may be compatible with Moore’s isolation version of the essential value test. It may be possible to have all the affective, cognitive, conative, and desiderative components of the reaction component in a mind which is alone in a world. I have no firm view on this, especially because it raises questions about internalism and externalism about mental content. © 2006 by Adam Swenson
106
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
+
>
,
6
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
!
8
107
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
3
"
,
)
! ) ! *
!
: ) :
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
108
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
6
) 8 )
6
8
:
6
8
* ,
2
! :
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
109
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
4
) (
?
.
1
) /
: @
/
C
!
) F
:
' !
)
(
0 ( A
!
/
B
)
G
) D
6
For example, Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen write “on our view, the claim that a certain value is final does not imply that it must be non-derivative. We interpret final value…by contrasting it with value as a means (instrumental value) and value as a part (contributive value). What is non-derivatively valuable must be valuable for its own sake, but not necessarily vice-versa.” Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (2003), 392. 7 Moore (1903), 143. Italics original. © 2006 by Adam Swenson
110
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
1
H
)
'
!
I
J
G0
!
! B
A
K
(
) !
*
!
! 2
/ -
4 -
)
4
!
! ( . )
)
. )
:
8
Zimmerman (2001), 37.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
)
(
)
111
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
! ;
)
(
C
@ !
(
( G
(
:
' L
)
*
(
! : .
.
!
! !
) )
( 9
Korsgaard (1983), 194.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
112
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
"
(
.
6
(
8 , + ,
(
( . (
+
# 4
' © 2006 by Adam Swenson
113
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
: * *
/
/ 2
/ !
!
/
N
$ 0 '
0 !
2
0 3
G E 2 E I J
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
J ! 6
G
M
114
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
%O
! %%
4
)
'
,
9 9
)9
!
. M;
,
!
1 ;
N
, ,
/!
;
% *
) /
) !
10
( /
2 2
/
Chisholm (1976), 114. An abstract and necessary x exists in every possible world, including worlds in which it has no concrete instances —that is, worlds in which it does not obtain. For example, the abstract property of squareness would exist but not obtain in a world populated only by circles and cylinders. 11
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
115
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
M2
N 0
!
M
N !
* M2
N
M
N ,
9
( / /
: :
: ! : /
:
/
/ 0
/
/ !
/ /
/ 0
! %&
; M;
12
!
N
Ross (1930), 112-113. Italics original.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
) G
116
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
&'( !
:
* " *
!
6
8 *
, /
*
) )
!
!
E 1
0 -
-
)
E ! 0 !
#$ & & . / 13
Anderson (1993), 20. See also, Anderson (1997), passim.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
%=
117
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
" /
)
!
!
)
!
,
,
)
:
:
/ ! @
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
3
!
118
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
%7
(
,
@
/
6 :
8
" A
B.
.
G .
. .
G
. %$
14 15
Kant (1785), 394. I don’t mean to suggest that Kant is a trope-theorist. Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (2003), 395. Italics original.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
119
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
!
;
! /!
;
* + (
@
%F
4
!
( 6
8
"
!
: *
!
' 2 %D
M
16
!
,
N
Indeed, Moore’s own view is unclear on this point. In saying that books and works of art can have intrinsic value he sometimes seems to be endorsing an object view. 17 The example is from O'Neill (1992). © 2006 by Adam Swenson
120
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
0 9
9
1
)9 A
)
)
B
C0
' ! 3
:
!
%K
)
%L
!
!
;
! 0
! )
M
!
N
M
!
N
2
!
M
!
! ! M 18 19
N Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (1999), 43. Italics original. Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (2003), 390.
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
(
N
121
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
M
N M
!
N
!
M
N
M
!
N ;
&O
M
! *
N
M
!
N
!
M
N 2
M
;
N
H M M
!
1 2
N
N
!
9
;
;
9
)9
)
1
'
G
A *
. .
20
! GA
B
My discussion here follows Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen in Rabinowicz and RonnowRasmussen (2003). © 2006 by Adam Swenson
B
122
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
! &%
C :
;
,
)
) !
' PQM
!
!N
> /! . : /!
!
P P
21
) !
Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (2003), 393. Italics original. I have substituted ‘intrinsic value’ where they write ‘final value’. © 2006 by Adam Swenson
P
123
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
-
P )
)
-
) ; M
;
N
)
)
)
P
: !
M!
"
N
!
P
!
P
:
P
! M (
N
) !
,
P .
) 0 © 2006 by Adam Swenson
M
N
124
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
P .
, /!
:
,
0 #$ % 7 ( (
+
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
@
#$ &
125
From: Swenson, Pain and Value
! * .
-
!
!
3
© 2006 by Adam Swenson
*