Idea Transcript
Constrained Pole Assignment Control Current Trends in Nonlinear Systems and Control pp 163-183 | Cite as Mikuláš Huba (1) 1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic Chapter 6 Citations 1.2k Downloads Part of the Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications book series (SCFA)
Summary This chapter gives an overview of simple controllers for SISO systems based on the generalization of the linear pole assignment method for constrained systems with dynamics ranging from relay minimum time systems to linear pole assignment systems. The design is based on splitting the nth-order system dynamics into n first-order ones, which can be constrained without any problems with stability and overshooting. It requires a successive decrease of the distance of the representative point from the next invariant set with lower dimension. Since the distance of the representative point to such invariant set can be defined in many ways, the construction of the constrained controllers is not unique. The controllers derived from the second-order integrator are simple, appropriate also for extremely fast application, and easy to tune by a procedure that generalizes the well-known methods by Ziegler and Nichols, or ?Aström and Hägglund, respectively. This work has been partially supported by the Slovak Scientific Grant Agency, Grant No. 1/7621/20.
Preview Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References 1.
Aström, KJ, Hägglund T (1984). Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specification of phase and amplitude margins. Automatica 20(5):645–651 MATH (http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?0543.93039) MathSciNet (http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=772227) CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(84)90014-1) Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=Automatic%20tuning%20of%20simple%20regulators%20with%20specification%20of%20phase%20and%20amplitude%20margins&a uthor=K.J..%20Astr%C3%B6m&author=T..%20H%C3%A4gglund&journal=Automatica&volume=20&issue=5&pages=645651&publication_year=1984)
2.
Bemporad A, Morari M, Dua V, Pistikopoulos EN (2002). The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems. Automatica 38:3–20 MATH (http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?0999.93018) MathSciNet (http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2110266) CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00174-1) Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=The%20explicit%20linear%20quadratic%20regulator%20for%20constrained%20systems&author=A..%20Bemporad&author=M..%20 Morari&author=V..%20Dua&author=E.N..%20Pistikopoulos&journal=Automatica&volume=38&pages=3-20&publication_year=2002)
3.
Föllinger O (1994). Regelungstechnik. 8. Auflage, Hüthig Buch Verlag Heidelberg MATH (http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?0334.93002) Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=Regelungstechnik&author=O..%20F%C3%B6llinger&publication_year=1994)
4.
Henrion D, Tarbouriech S, Kučera V (2001). Control of linear systems subject to input constraints: a polynomial approach. Automatica 37:597–604 MATH (http://www.emis.de/MATH-item?1034.93039) CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00193-X) Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=Control%20of%20linear%20systems%20subject%20to%20input%20constraints%3A%20a%20polynomial%20approach&author=D..% 20Henrion&author=S..%20Tarbouriech&author=V..%20Ku%C4%8Dera&journal=Automatica&volume=37&pages=597604&publication_year=2001)
5.
Hippe P (2003). A new windup prevention scheme for stable and unstable systems. In: Proceedings of 2nd IFAC Conference on Control Systems Design’ 03, Bratislava, Slovak Republic Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Hippe%20P%20%282003%29.%20A%20new%20windup%20prevention%20scheme%20for%20stable%20and%20unstable%20systems. %20In%3A%20Proceedings%20of%202nd%20IFAC%20Conference%20on%20Control%20Systems%20Design%E2%80%99%2003%2C% 20Bratislava%2C%20Slovak%20Republic)
6.
Huba M (1999). Dynamical classes in the minimum time pole assignment control. In: Computing anticipatory systems-CASYS’ 98. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%20%281999%29.%20Dynamical%20classes%20in%20the%20minimum%20time%20pole%20assignment%20control.%20I n%3A%20Computing%20anticipatory%20systemsCASYS%E2%80%99%2098.%20American%20Institute%20of%20Physics%2C%20Woodbury%2C%20NY)
7.
Huba M, Bisták P, Skachová Z, Žáková K (1998). P-and PD-controllers for I1 and I2 models with dead time. 6th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Systems, Alghero, Italy 514–519 Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%2C%20Bist%C3%A1k%20P%2C%20Skachov%C3%A1%20Z%2C%20%C5%BD%C3%A1kov%C3%A1%20K%20%2819 98%29.%20P-and%20PDcontrollers%20for%20I1%20and%20I2%20models%20with%20dead%20time.%206th%20IEEE%20Mediterranean%20Conference%20on% 20Control%20and%20Systems%2C%20Alghero%2C%20Italy%20514%E2%80%93519)
8.
Huba M, Bisták P (1999). Dynamic classes in the PID control. In: Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%2C%20Bist%C3%A1k%20P%20%281999%29.%20Dynamic%20classes%20in%20the%20PID%20control.%20In%3A%20 Proceedings%20of%20the%201999%20American%20Control%20Conference%2C%20San%20Diego%2C%20CA)
9.
Huba M, Sovišová D, Oravec I (1999). Invariant sets based concept of the pole assignment control. In: European Control Conference, VDI/VDE Düsseldorf, Germany Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%2C%20Sovi%C5%A1ov%C3%A1%20D%2C%20Oravec%20I%20%281999%29.%20Invariant%20sets%20based%20conce pt%20of%20the%20pole%20assignment%20control.%20In%3A%20European%20Control%20Conference%2C%20VDI%2FVDE%20D%C 3%BCsseldorf%2C%20Germany)
10.
Huba M (2003). Constrained systems design. Vol. 1, Basic controllers. Vol. 2, Basic structures. STU Bratislava (in Slovak) Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%20%282003%29.%20Constrained%20systems%20design.%20Vol.%201%2C%20Basic%20controllers.%20Vol.%202%2C %20Basic%20structures.%20STU%20Bratislava%20%28in%20Slovak%29)
11.
Huba M (2003). The helicopter rack control, 11th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Rhodes, Greece Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%20%282003%29.%20The%20helicopter%20rack%20control%2C%2011th%20Mediterranean%20Conference%20on%20C ontrol%20and%20Automation%2C%20Rhodes%2C%20Greece)
12.
Huba M. (2004). Gain scheduled constrained controller for SISO plants. In: Southeastern Europe, USA, Japan and EC Workshop on Research and Education in Control and Signal Processing REDISCOVER 2004, Cavtat, Croatia, 1:104–107 Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=Gain%20scheduled%20constrained%20controller%20for%20SISO%20plants&author=M..%20Huba&journal=Southeastern%20Europe %2C%20USA%2C%20Japan%20and%20EC%20Workshop%20on%20Research%20and%20Education%20in%20Control%20and%20Sign al%20Processing%20REDISCOVER%202004&volume=1&pages=104-107&publication_year=2004)
13.
Huba M, Bisták P (2004). Constrained controllers based on the dynamics decomposition. In: Southeastern Europe, USA, Japan and EC Workshop on Research and Education in Control and Signal Processing REDISCOVER 2004, Cavtat, Croatia, 1:49–52 Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup? title=Constrained%20controllers%20based%20on%20the%20dynamics%20decomposition&author=M..%20Huba&author=P..%20Bist%C3 %A1k&journal=Southeastern%20Europe%2C%20USA%2C%20Japan%20and%20EC%20Workshop%20on%20Research%20and%20Educa tion%20in%20Control%20and%20Signal%20Processing%20REDISCOVER%202004&volume=1&pages=49-52&publication_year=2004)
14.
Huba M (2004). Gain scheduled constrained controller for SISO plants. IFAC Conf. NOLCOS 2004, Stuttgart Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Huba%20M%20%282004%29.%20Gain%20scheduled%20constrained%20controller%20for%20SISO%20plants.%20IFAC%20Conf.%20 NOLCOS%202004%2C%20Stuttgart)
15.
Rönnbäck S (1996). Nonlinear dynamic windup detection in anti-windup compensators. Preprints CESA’ 96, Lille, 1014–1019 Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Nonlinear%20dynamic%20windup%20detection%20in%20antiwindup%20compensators&author=S.%20R%C3%B6nnb%C3%A4ck&journal=Preprints%20CESA%E2%80%99&volume=96&pages=10141019&publication_year=1996)
16.
Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1942). Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME, 759–768 Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar? q=Ziegler%20JG%2C%20Nichols%20NB%20%281942%29.%20Optimum%20settings%20for%20automatic%20controllers.%20Trans.%20 ASME%2C%20759%E2%80%93768)
Copyright information © Birkhäuser Boston 2006
About this chapter Cite this chapter as: Huba M. (2006) Constrained Pole Assignment Control. In: Menini L., Zaccarian L., Abdallah C.T. (eds) Current Trends in Nonlinear Systems and Control. Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser Boston DOI (Digital Object Identifier) https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4470-9_9 Publisher Name Birkhäuser Boston Print ISBN 978-0-8176-4383-6 Online ISBN 978-0-8176-4470-3 eBook Packages Mathematics and Statistics About this book Reprints and Permissions
Personalised recommendations
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG. Part of Springer Nature. Not logged in Not affiliated 185.191.229.108