Idea Transcript
More Next Blog»
Create Blog Sign In
RHETORICAL STRATEGIES OF THE LITERARY/CULTURAL DISCOURSE ON NATIONAL IDENTITY An Optional Course for 3rd-year English Students * Dr. Bogdan Ştefanescu Bio Note
GO TO SECTION:
Bogdan Stefanescu Bogdan Stefanescu
COURSE PRESENTATION (1) READING ASSIGNMENTS (1)
Blog Archive
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2018
t 2018 (1) t February (1) REZULTATE FEBR. 2018
REZULTATE FEBR. 2018 For those who failed, please note the format and acceptable (identitty construction) theme as per webpage instructions: " · Final written assignment. The final written assignment is a 6page critical essay. In order for the essay to be taken into consideration it must: a) be based on preliminary negotiation of the theme, the approach, the format and the structure of the argument, b) have a clearly stated theme, approach and structure, c) comply with the style of an academic critical essay (references, bibliography, editing etc.). Please note that the theme has to deal with the (construction of a) cultural identity of a (national/ethnic etc.) group and the approach must be derived from the area of discourse studies (rhetoric, pragmatics, DA/CDA, power and discourse etc.) and/or political/ideology studies. Work in the form of personal essay, editorial journalism, historical overview will not be taken into account. " Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. ESE
NUME
ACTIV
U
NOTA
PREZE
SEMIN
FIN
CATAL
NTE
AR
AL
OG
OBSERVATII not in keeping with the
BUDURU
format and identitarian
TEODORA
7
5
4
FAIL
6
8
4
FAIL
theme I requested
CERCEL DENIS CERCEL
lacking seminar
RALUCA
5
5
FAIL
?
assignments
CHIRICĂ
not in keeping with the
MIRUNA-
format and identitarian
IOANA
6
8
4
FAIL
6
8
8.00
8
5
10
6
8
theme I requested
COZMA GEORGIANAMIRUNA DIDULESCU DENYSE
disjointed argument, little connection with the subject matter of this class; occasionally, the HAGIU
author's attitude to
ȘERBAN
Hitler seems
ANDREI
5
8
8
7
ambiguous. not in keeping with the
HAIMED LINA-
format and identitarian
DANA
4
5
4
FAIL
5
10
9
10
theme I requested
IAMANDI ANCA
not in keeping with the ION CRISTIAN
format and identitarian
MIHAI
5
8
7
6
theme I requested unclear argument, self-
IONAȘCU
contradictions,
THEODORA
5
5
6
5
unscientific sources. not in keeping with the
MĂCĂNEAŢĂ
format and identitarian
ANDRA
4
8
FAIL
4
theme I requested failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-
MALCIU
page-long essay to
CLAUDIA-
compensate for poor
MARILENA
1
5
FAIL
?
attendance too much history, too many clichees, not
MICLĂUȘ
enough personal
ANDREEA
processing and case
MARIA
7
8
8
7
analysis. hardly any personal contribution in this
MANSOUR
essay; not in keeping
GHUFRAN
with the format and
AIJAD
5
5
FAIL
4
theme I requested replete with serious language mistakes, nor
NEAGU
really proving control of
MAGDALENA
any of the approaches
IRINA
4
5
5
4.5
studied in this class. failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3page-long essay to
NICA
compensate for poor
ALEXANDRA
1
5
?
FAIL
NIŢĂ ELIZA
6
5
8.5
8
attendance failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3page-long essay to compensate for poor
NIŢĂ LORENA
2
5
?
FAIL
attendance
PANARIU
lacking seminar
IRINA-ELENA
4
8
FAIL
?
assignments failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3page-long essay to
POSTICA
compensate for poor
VICTORIA
1
5
?
FAIL
TOMA MIHAI
7
8
9.5
10
4
8
9
9
7
8
?
FAIL
attendance
ULIANOV IOANA VELOIU ALEXANDRA
no final essay
No comments: Labels: REZULTATE FEBR. 2018
Posted by Bogdan Stefanescu at 11:33 AM
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2016
REZULTATE FINALE FEB 2016 Dragii mei, Aveti mai jos rezultatele finale. Cei care nu au obtinut nota de trecere pot reincerca trimitindu-mi notele de lectura/conspectele si eseurile refacute in ultima saptamina din mai, imediat inainte de sesiunea de restante. (Daca mi-ati trimis conspectele si dintr-un motiv ori altul nu mi-au parvenit, mai puteti sa mi le retrimiteti miine ca sa va salvati media.) Va multumesc pentru colaborare si va urez succes in acest final de ciclu universitar. B.Stefanescu
NUME
PREZ.
ACTIVIT
READING
ESEU
MEDIA
OBSERVAT
SEMIN.
NOTES
FINAL
FINALA
II eseul e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din metodologia
Cirstescu Alina
studiate la
5
7
9
7 curs
5,00
fara reading notes, eseul e "uninformed opinion" - nu are nimic de-a face cu discutia teoretica si din metodologia
Cristea Gabriela
studiate la
5
4
2
5 curs
5,00
eseul (plin de greseli) e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din metodologia studiate la
Dobrita Laura
curs;
4
2
5
4,00
PICAT prez.insufic. reading notes doar 1 din 6 titluri din bibl.; eseul nu defineste termenii (anarhism, socialism etc.),
Dumitru Daniel Costin
argumentatia e
7
10
5
7 sovaitoare
6,00
Iamandi Florin
(reading
5
10
4
9 notes?)
10,00
eseul e un simplu comentariu literar de scoala/liceu, nu razbate nimic din discutia teoretica si din
Leaua
metodologia
Andreea
studiate la
Catalina
5
7
9
7 curs
5,00
eseul fara legatura cu constructia identitara,
Lucacs Mihai
7 prez. insufic.
4
7
6,00
5
10
10
10,00
10
5
5
9
9
9
Maier Alexandra Malita (Radulescu) Mirela
fara reading notes; eseul nu discuta constructia identitara, engl. este f.
Memet Denisa
carenta,
4
4
2
5 prezenta insuf.
5,00
eseul=periplu istorist, fara analiza
Minculescu Adina
discursului
5
7
9
7 identitar
6,00
fara reading notes si fara
Panduru Madalina
eseu, prez.
4
7
2
0,00
5
9
10
10,00
PICAT
Insuficienta
Popescu Roxana
10 confuzii intre nationalism si sovinism/xeno
Purcherea Adela
fobie/rasism
5
7
7
7,00
7 etc.
7
5
9
9,00
9
6
10
10
10,00
10
Puteanu Georgiana Radu Roxana Rascov Catalin
fara reading
6
8
2
10,00
6
10
10
9,50
8 notes
Stancu Cristina
10 nu sint folosite nici notiuni de studiul ideologiilor politice, nici analiza
Stoenescu Anca Cristina
retorica/discur
5
7
8
6 siva
5,00
fara reading
Toader
notes si fara
Valentina
eseu, prez.
Ioana
2
4
2
0,00
PICAT
Insuficienta fara reading notes; prea putin despre constructia identitatii culturale a
Vasile Vlad
6
5
2
7 unui grup
8,00
eseu PLAGIAT; fara reading notes;
Voicu Elena Diana
prezenta
4
4
2
1,00
PICAT
insuficienta fara reading notes; nici o legatura cu constructia unei identitati culturale, nici o analiza a discursului, nici o legatura
Zuo
cu ce am
Dragomiresc
discutat la
u Vlad Quan
5
4
Posted by Bogdan Stefanescu at 1:40 PM
Home Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
2
4,50
5 curs
No comments: Labels: REZULTATE FINALE FEB 2016
Older Posts
2016 (1) 2015 (1) 2009 (1) Followers