Diet Composition and Foraging Habitat Use by Three Species of [PDF]

Mar 16, 2017 - Com o objetivo de avaliar a dieta e o hábitat de forrageio das cobras d'água no leste da Amazônia bras

2 downloads 13 Views 184KB Size

Recommend Stories


Specialist and generalist species in habitat use
Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. Matsuo Basho

Diet of Astyanax species
Those who bring sunshine to the lives of others cannot keep it from themselves. J. M. Barrie

Species Composition of Ants
Forget safety. Live where you fear to live. Destroy your reputation. Be notorious. Rumi

Habitat use by fishes of Lake Superior. II. Consequences of diel habitat use for habitat linkages and
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right. Isaac Asimov

Diet composition of Myotis myotis
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world. Anne

Species diversity and species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens
Don't watch the clock, do what it does. Keep Going. Sam Levenson

Distributions of three species of
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that

Species Composition of Fruit Flies
Don’t grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form. Rumi

Idea Transcript


SEARCH

Quick Search



Advanced Search



ABOUT RESOURCES CONTACT US

My Account : Log in | Admin | Help

Browse | Subscribe | Publish List of Issues Current Issue Category: BioOne.1 Aims & Scope

Home / All Titles / Journal of Herpetology / Jun 2017 / pg(s) 215-222

Journal of Herpetology Published by: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles

Editorial Office Author Guidelines Print ISSN: 0022-1511

Select Language t

« previous article : next article »

translator disclaimer

Current: Mar 2018 : Volume 52 Issue 1

Impact Factor: 0.911 Journal Citation Reports® Ranking: 96/162 - Zoology

» Abstract & References

Journal of Herpetology 51(2):215-222. 2017

Full Text

https://doi.org/10.1670/15-161

PDF (176 KB)

BioOne Member Since: 2003 Frequency: Quarterly

Article Views

Diet Composition and Foraging Habitat Use by Three Species of Water Snakes, Helicops Wagler, 1830, (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in Eastern Brazilian Amazonia

Social Tools

Print Friendly

Cássia de Carvalho Teixeira Luciano Fogaça de Assis Montag and Maria Cristina dos Santos-Costa Title Tools Copyright 2017 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles

Most Read Articles Fifty-Three Years a Tadpole Co-occurrence and Hybridization between Necturus maculosus and a Heretofore Unknown Necturus in the Southern

Article Impact via Altmetric.com

Accepted: July 12, 2016; Published: March 16, 2017 [+] Author & Article Info

Article Tools Email

Appalachians

Abstract

Habitat Selection by the Invasive Species Burmese Python in Southern Florida

Water snakes of the genus Helicops have different uses of food resources that can facilitate species coexistence. To assess diet and foraging habitat of water snakes in eastern Brazilian Amazonia, we used prey consumed by Helicops angulatus, Helicops hagmanni, and Helicops polylepis deposited in scientific collections to analyze variations in composition, breadth, and niche overlap on a regional scale. Among these prey, we used fish (main item) to calculate ecomorphological attributes that might indicate fish habitat and, consequently, the foraging habitat used by snakes. Our analyses indicate these three snake species have similar diet compositions but differ in the proportion in which each item is consumed. Helicops angulatus had the most generalized diet and H. hagmanni had the most specialized diet. Food niche overlap among the three species was moderate. All three species forage in the medium and upper strata of the water column in the lentic zone; however, H. polylepis feeds on prey with varied morphological features that may indicate foraging in many types of environments. The snakes have similar diets and foraging habitats; however, they use food items and space in different proportions.

Scute Patterns as an Individual Identification Tool in an American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) Population on Coiba Island, Panama A New Species of Tupinambis Daudin, 1802 (Squamata: Teiidae) from Central South America More Most Cited Articles Making Great Leaps Forward: Accounting for Detectability in Herpetological Field Studies Amphibian Decline or Extinction? Current Declines Dwarf Background Extinction Rate Anuran Reproductive Modes: Evolving Perspectives Influence of a Field Trip on the Attitude of Schoolchildren toward Unpopular Organisms: An Experience with Snakes Modeling Anuran Detection and Site Occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) Routes in Maryland

Disable search highlighting Add to Favorites Sign Up for E-alerts Download to Citation Manager Alert me when this article is cited: Email | RSS Rights & Permissions

Citing Articles

Resumo Cobras d'água do gênero Helicops apresentam diferentes formas de uso dos recursos alimentares, o que pode facilitar a coexistência das espécies. Com o objetivo de avaliar a dieta e o hábitat de forrageio das cobras d'água no leste da Amazônia brasileira, nós utilizamos presas consumidas por Helicops angulatus, Helicops hagmanni e Helicops polylepis depositadas em coleções científicas para analisar variações na composição, amplitude e sobreposição de nicho numa escala regional. Dentre essas presas, nós utilizamos os peixes (principal item) para calcular atributos ecomorfológicos que podem indicar o hábitat dos peixes e, consequentemente, o hábitat de forrageio utilizado pelas serpentes. Nossas análises indicaram que as três espécies de serpentes possuem uma composição da dieta semelhante, mas diferem na proporção em que cada item é consumido. Helicops angulatus apresentou a dieta mais generalista e H. hagmanni a mais especializada. A sobreposição de nicho alimentar entre as três espécies foi moderada. As três espécies forrageiam nos estratos médio e superior da coluna d'água em ambientes lênticos; no entanto, H. polylepis se alimenta de presas com características morfológicas mais variadas, o que pode indicar o forrageio em muitos tipos de ambientes. As serpentes possuem dietas e hábitats de forrageio semelhantes, porém, utilizam alimento e espaço em proporções diferentes.

More Sign up for e-alerts RSS Feeds

Looking for a job? Visit the BioOne Career Center and apply to open positions across the sciences. careercenter.BioOne.org

Literature Cited Ab'saber, A. N. 2002. Base para o estudo dos ecossistemas da Amazônia brasileira. Estudos Avançados 16:7–30. Crossref, Google Scholar Aguiar, L. F. S., and M. Di-Bernardo. 2004. Diet and feeding behavior of Helicops infrataeniatus (Serpentes: Colubridae: Xenodontinae) in Southern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 39:7–14. Crossref, Google Scholar Anderson, M. J., and D. C. I. Walsh. 2013. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing?Ecological Monographs 83:557–574. Crossref, Google Scholar Arnold, S. J. 1972. Species densities of predators and their prey. American Naturalist 106:220–236. Crossref, Google Scholar Ávila, R. W., V. L. Ferreira, and J. A. O. Arruda. 2006. Natural history of the South American water snake Helicops leopardinus (Colubridae: Hydropsini) in the Pantanal, Central Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 40:274–279. BioOne, Google Scholar Ávila-Pires, T. C. S. 1995. Lizards of Brazilian Amazonia (Reptilia: Squamata). Zoologische Verhandelingen, Netherlands. Google Scholar Balon, E. K., S. S. Crawford, and A. Lelek. 1986. Fish communities of the upper Danube River (Germany, Austria) prior to the new Rhein-Main-Donau connection. Environmental Biology of Fishes 15:243–271. Google Scholar Breda, L., E. F. Oliveira, and E. Goulart. 2005. Ecomorfologia de locomoção de peixes com enfoque para espécies neotropicais. Acta Scientiarum: Biological Sciences 27:371–381. Crossref, Google Scholar Brejão, G. L., P. Gerhard, and J. Zuanon. 2013. Functional trophic composition of the ichthyofauna of forest streams in eastern Brazilian Amazon. Neotropical Ichthyology 11:361–373. Crossref, Google Scholar Cabalzar, A. 2005. Peixe e Gente no alto rio Tiquié. Conhecimentos tukano e tuyuka, ictiologia, etnologia. Instituto Socioambiental, Brasil. Google Scholar Claro, L. Jr., E. Ferreira, J. Zuanon, and C. Araújo-Lima. 2004. O efeito da floresta alagada na alimentação de três espécies de peixes onívoros em lagos de várzea da Amazônia Central, Brasil. Acta Amazonica 34:133–137. Crossref, Google Scholar Cochran-Bierdeman, J. L., and K. O. Winemiller. 2010. Relationships among habitat, ecomorphology and diets of cichlids in the Bladen River, Belize. Environmental Biology of Fishes 88:143–152. Crossref, Google Scholar Cunha, O. R., and F. P. Nascimento. 1978. Ofídios da Amazônia: as cobras da região leste do Pará. Publicações Avulsas do Museu Goeldi, Brasil. Google Scholar Duellman, W. E. 1978. The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. Miscellaneous Publication, Museum Natural History, University of Kansas, USA. Google Scholar Duellman, W. E. 1995. Temporal fluctuations in abundances of anuran amphibians in a seasonal Amazonian Rainforest. Journal of Herpetology 29:13–21. Crossref, Google Scholar Durso, A. M., J. D. Willson, and C. T. Winne. 2013. Habitat influences diet overlap in aquatic snake assemblages. Journal of Zoology 291:185–193. Crossref, Google Scholar Ford, N. B., and D. F. Ford. 2002. Notes on the ecology of the South American water snake Helicops angulatus (Squamata: Colubridae) in Nariva Swamp, Trinidad. Caribbean Journal of Science 38:129–132. Google Scholar França, F. G. R., and A. F. B, Araújo.2007. Are there co-occurrence patterns that structure snake communities in Central Brazil?Brazilian Journal of Biology 67:33–40. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar França, F. G. R., O. D. Mesquita, C. C. Nogueira, and A. F. B. Araújo. 2008. Phylogeny and ecology determine morphological structure in a snake assemblage in the Central Brazilian Cerrado. Copeia 2008:23–38. BioOne, Google Scholar Gosline, W. A. 1971. Functional morphology and classification of teleostean fishes. University Press of Hawaii, USA. Google Scholar Gotelli, N. J., and G. L. Entsminger. 2001. Program EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0.Acquired Intelligence, Inc. and Kesey-Bear. Google Scholar Goulding, M., M. L. Carvalho, and E. J. G. Ferreira. 1988. Rio Negro: Rich life in Poor Water: Amazonian Diversity and Foodchain Ecology as Seen through Fish Communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands. Google Scholar Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals. American Naturalist 93:145–159. Crossref, Google Scholar Hynes, H. B. N. 1950. The food of freshwater sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius) with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. Journal of Animal Ecology 19:36–58. Crossref, Google Scholar INMET. 1992. Normais Climatológicas. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, Brazil. Google Scholar Kullander, S. O. 2003. Family Synbranchidae (swamp-eels). Pp. 594–595in R. E. Reis, S. O. Kullander, and C. J. Ferraris Jr. (eds.), Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. EDIPUCRS, Brasil. Google Scholar Lande, R. 1973. Food and feeding habits of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L) in Borgenfjorden, North Tröndelag, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21:91–100. Google Scholar Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, USA. Google Scholar Lima, A. P., W. E. Magnusson, M. Menin, L. K. Erdtmann, D. J. Rodrigues, C. Keller, and W. Hödl. 2008. Guia de sapos da reserva Adolpho Ducke: Amazônia Central. Áttema Design Editorial, Brasil. Google Scholar Lowe-McConnell, R. H. 1999. Estudos ecológicos de comunidades de peixes tropicais. EDUSP, Brasil. Google Scholar Luiselli, L. 2006a. Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in snakes: the search for general geographical and guild patterns. Oikos 114:193–211. Crossref, Google Scholar Luiselli, L. 2006b. Broad geographic, taxonomic and ecological patterns of interpopulation variation in the dietary habits of snakes. Web Ecology 6:2–16. Crossref, Google Scholar Luiselli, L. 2006c. Interspecific relationships between two species of sympatric afrotropical water snake in relation to a seasonally fluctuating food resource. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:91–100. Crossref, Google Scholar Luiselli, L. 2006d. Food niche overlap between sympatric potential competitors increases with habitat alteration at different trophic levels in rain-forest reptiles (omnivorous tortoises and carnivorous vipers. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22:695–704. Crossref, Google Scholar Luiselli, L., and L. Rugiero. 1991. Food niche partitioning by water snakes (genus Natrix) at a freshwater environment in central Italy. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 6:439–444. Crossref, Google Scholar Luz-Agostinho, K. D., A. A. Agostinho, L. C. Gomes, H. F. Júlio Jr., and R. Fugi. 2009. Effects of footing regime on the feeding activity and body condition of piscivorous fish in the Upper paraná River floodplain. Brazilian Journal of Biology 69:481–490. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar Mahon, R. 1984. Divergent structure in fish taxocenes of north temperate stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:330–350. Crossref, Google Scholar Martins, M., and E. Oliveira. 1998. Natural history of snakes in forests of the Manaus Region, Central Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetological Natural History 6:78–150. Google Scholar Maschio, G. F., M. C, Santos-Costa, and A. L. C. Prudente. 2009. Comunidade de serpentes da região de Caxiuanã com avaliação da eficiência dos métodos de captura. Pp. 589–603inP. L. B. Lisboa (Org.), Caxiuanã: desafios para a conservação de uma Floresta Nacional na Amazônia. MPEG, Brasil. Google Scholar Menin, M., F. Waldez, and A. P. Lima. 2008. Temporal variation in the abundance and number of species of frogs in 10,000 ha of a forest in Central Amazonia, Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology 3:68–81. BioOne, Google Scholar Metzger, C., P. Christe, and S. Ursenbacher. 2011. Diet variability of two convergent natricine colubrids in an invasive-native interaction. Mertensiella 18:86–93. Google Scholar Mushinsky, H. R., and J. J. Hebrard. 1977. Food partitioning by five species of water snakes in Louisiana. Herpetologica 33:162–166. Google Scholar Okada, E. K., A. A. Agostinho, M. Petrere, and T. Penczak. 2003. Factors affecting fish diversity and abundance in drying ponds and lagoons in the upper Paraná River Brazil. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 3:97–110. Google Scholar Oksanen J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, et al. 2015. Package Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3–1. Google Scholar Oyakawa, O.T., A. Akama, K. C. Mautari, and J. C. Nolasco. 2006. Peixes de riachos da Mata atlântica: nas Unidades de Conservação do Vale do Ribeira em Iguape no Estado de São Paulo. Neotrópica, Brasil. Google Scholar Pianka, E. R. 1973. The structure of lizards communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:53–74. Crossref, Google Scholar R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. Google Scholar Rahman, S. C., A. A. Reza, R. Datta, C. L. Jenkins, and L. Luiselli. 2014. Niche partitioning and population structure of sympatric mud snakes (Homalopsidae) from Bangladesh. Herpetological Journal 24:123–128. Google Scholar Santos, X., J. M. Pleguezuelos, J. C. Brito, X. P. Llorente, and S. Fahd. 2008. Prey availability drives geographic dietary differences of a Mediterranean predator, the lataste's viper (Vipera latastei). Herpetological Journal 18:18–22. Google Scholar Schoener, T. W. 1982. The controversy over interspecific competition: despite spirited criticism, competition continues to occupy a major domain in ecological thought. American Scientist 70:586–595. Google Scholar Silvano, R. A. M., B. D. Amaral, and O. T. Oyakawa. 2000. Spatial and temporal patterns of diversity and distribution of the Upper Juruá River fish community (Brazilian Amazon). Environmental Biology of Fishes 57:25–35. Crossref, Google Scholar Silvano, R. A. M., A. Begossi, O. T. Oyakawa, and B. D. Amaral. 2001. Peixes do Alto Rio Juruá (Amazônia, Brasil). Editora da USP, Brasil. Google Scholar Sturaro, M. J., and J. O. Gomes. 2008. Feeding behavior of the Amazonian water snake Helicops hagmanni Roux, 1910 (Reptilia: Squamata: Colubridae: Hydropsini). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 3:225–228. Google Scholar Toft, C. A. 1985. Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia 1985:1–21. Crossref, Google Scholar Tuomisto, H., K. Ruokolainen, R. Kalliola, A. Linna, W. Danjoy, and Z. Rodriguez. 1995. Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science 269:63–66. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar Vitt, L. J. 1991. Ecology and life history of the wide-foraging lizard Kentropyx calcarata (Teiidae) in Amazonian Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:2791–2799. Crossref, Google Scholar Watson, D. J., and E. K. Balon. 1984. Ecomorphological analysis of fish taxocenes in rainforest streams of northern Borneo. Journal of Fish Biology 25:371–384. Crossref, Google Scholar Wiens, J. J., and C. H. Graham. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:519–539. Crossref, Google Scholar Willson, J. D., C. T. Winne, M. A. Pilgrim, C. S. Romanek, and J. W. Gibbons. 2010. Seasonal variation in terrestrial resource subsidies influences trophic niche width and overlap in two aquatic snake species: a stable isotope approach. Oikos 119:1161–1171. Crossref, Google Scholar

Cited by Fernanda Magalhães Silva, Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente, Fabio Andrade Machado, Marina Meireles Santos, Hussam Zaher, Erika Hingst-Zaher. (2017) Aquatic adaptations in a Neotropical coral snake: A study of morphological convergence. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 4. Online publication date: 4-Dec-2017. Crossref BioOne is the product of innovative collaboration between scientific societies, libraries, academe and the private sector.

21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 • Phone 202.296.1605 • Fax 202.872.0884 Copyright © 2018 BioOne All rights reserved

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.