Idea Transcript
DOCUMENTS Home (/)
Documents (/category/Documents)
EVIDENCE Reviewer Finals (/evidence-reviewer-finals)
EVIDENCE Reviewer Finals DESCRIPTION
Stand out with a website
evidence
1
Categories
Published
DOWNLOAD (HTTPS://DOCGO.NET/PHILOSOPHY-OF-MONEY.HTML? DOCUMENTS (/CATEGORY/DOCUMENTS) JUL 23, 2017 UTM_SOURCE=EVIDENCE-REVIEWER-FINALS&UTM_CAMPAIGN=DOWNLOAD)
SEARCH Search...
SIMILAR DOCUMENTS
Loading preview. Please wait...
(/criminalprocedurefinalsreviewer2014-docx) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FINALS REVIEWER 2014.docx (/criminal-procedure-finalsreviewer-2014-docx)
1 of 61 (/site/donate.html)
Report (/report/evidence-reviewer-finals)
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us (/report/evidence-reviewer-finals) to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
RELATED DOCUMENTS
(/law-123negotiableinstruments -finalsreviewer) LAW 123 Negotiable Instruments Finals Reviewer (/law-123-negotiable-instrumentsfinals-reviewer)
(/comprehe nsiverevieweruntil-finals) Comprehensive Reviewer - Until Finals (/comprehensive-reviewer-until-finals)
SHARE
Stand out with a website
TRANSCRIPT EVIDENCEIntroduction Definition – the means, sanctioned by these rules, of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding, the truthrespecting a matter of fact. (Rule 128, Sec. 1.Scope of applicability – rules of e!idence shall be the same in all courts and in all trials and hearings,e cept as other#ise pro!ided by la# or these rules. (Rule 128, Sec 2. Notes: The Rules on Evidence apply only when there is going to be a trial. Note that there can be a judgment on pleadings, by confession, consent and compromise etc. IN I!I #$E$. %ere denial inthe answer in a I!I #$E will not present a probandum hence no need for the court to try thecase. $uch general denial will be considered as an admission.In RI%IN# #$E$, &e have to wait until the accused enters a plea. This time a general denial is allowed. If the accused enters a plea of guilty there is no probandum. 'owever in RI%IN# #$E$, the court could still try the case if the case involves a heinous crime.The Rules on evidence are not self(e)ecuting. $o the rule is any evidence submitted will beadmitted so long as there is no objection. This principle is only for the purpose of admissibility. It does not mean that the court will ta*e these irrelevant evidence in evaluating on the merits of thecase. DIFFERENCE IN RULES ON EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES AND CIVIL CASESBASISCriminal CaseCivil Case $uantum of %roof%roof &eyond Reasonable Doubt%reponderance of e!idenceDenial'eneral Denial llo#ed)ust be Specific Denial*ithdra#al of %lea+dmission*ithdra#n plea is inadmissibleudicial dmission #ithdra#nbecomes an e trajudicialadmission-ross amination inSummary %rocedurepplicable/ot applicable0uiponderance Ruleccused is ac0uitted%arty #ho loses is the one #hohas burden of proof %resence of -ircumstantial!idence)ore than one is re0uiredne suffices%ri!iliged -ommunication Dr.%atient/ot applicablepplicable-ompulsion as a #itness-annot compel accused to be a#itness/o prohibition, rules pro!idesonly limitations Evidentiary rivile!e entitles the pri!ilege holder to #ithhold competent e!idence and, in somecircumstances, to pre!ent others from re!ealing such e!idence. 3he pri!ilege is granted #hen theprotected interest is considered important enough to out#eigh the concern #ith determining thetruth. 3he pri!ilege holder need not be a party to the proceeding in 0uestion. 4nli5e adis0ualification, a pri!ilege can be #ai!ed. %ri!ileges are often intended to preser!e confidentialrelationships. E#ecutive rivile!e members of the e ecuti!e branch of go!ernment cannot legally be forced todisclose their confidential communications #hen such disclosure #ould ad!ersely affect theoperations or procedures of the e ecuti!e branch. FAC$UM Stand out with a website ROBANDUM vs% FAC$UM ROBANS +actum robandum(proposition to be established. The fact-s in issue.+actum robans( materials evidencing the propositionNotes: . In both I!I and RI%IN# cases, the probandum contained in the pleadings could be hlp©2009 Page 1 10/28/2014 1 changed in the pre(trial order. 'owever, with respect to RI%IN# #$E$, the pre(trial order $'/0 1 N/T substantially change the accusation-indictment contained in the Previous post Next post information, otherwisethe case will be dismissed.2. # court can validly try a fact in issue not CH203 Fall 2014 NMR Practice Quiz 1 Clasificacion De Los Materiales.pdf raised in the pleadings or pre(trial order. Rule 3 provides that a fact in issue may be raised Answers.pdf (/Ch203-Fall-2014-Nmr(/Clasificacion-De-Los-Materialeswith the e)press or implied consent of the parties duringthe trial 4#mendment to conform to Practice-Quiz-1-Answers-Pdf) Pdf) evidence56. #scertainment of probandum does not apply in special proceedings. 4i.e. If there Jul 23, 2017 Jul 23, 2017 is a petition for probate of a will, even if there is no opposition the petitioner is still re7uired by law to prove that the will has been duly e)ecuted in accordance with the ivil ode5 EVIDENCE vs% ROOF roof( is the effect of evidence. It is the probative effect of evidence and is the conviction or persuasion of the mind resulting from a consideration of the latter.Evidence( is the cause necessary to establish proof. I% Admissi&ility . Rele!ance – 3he e!idence has such a relation to the fact in issue as to induce belief in its e istence or none istence.!idence on collateral matters shall not be allo#ed, e cept #hen it tends in any reasonable degree toestablish the probability or improbability of the fact in issue. (Rule 128, Secs. 6 and 7. ( In conclusion, relevancy is not determined by law nor the rules of court. It is determined purely by /8I. &. -ompetence – 3he e!idence is not e cluded by the la# or the rules (Rule 128, Sec. 6. Do not confuse -)%3/3 *3/SS from -)%3/3 9D/-. 3he -)%3/-: 3S3of e!idence applies to the 3S3)/: of the 0ualified #itness. $ince admissibility of evidence is determined by its relevance and competence, admissibility is therefore an affair of logic and law. /n the other hand, the weight to be given to such evidencedepends on judicial evaluation within the guidelines provided in Rule 66 and the jurisprudence laid down by the court. 4eople vs. Turco, 23335Relevant evidence is one that has any value in reason as tending to prove any matter probable in an action. Evidence is said to be material when it is directed to prove a fact in issue asdetermined by the rules of substantive law and pleadings, while competent evidence is one that isnot e)cluded by law in a particular case. 49autista vs. #parece, ;5 E#clusionary Rules under t'e ()*+ Constitution 1.1Secs. 2 ; 6, rt. – 3he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, andeffects against unreasonable searches and sei