Idea Transcript
EN THt HtGH COURT OF KARNATA:A URCUET NCH AT GULEARCA AflED THIS ThE I ?
flAy
OF 1ANuARY, 2012
IHE HON’BLE MR. JUSTiCE ASHOK B. HINCHICSE RI
1T WEE FE N: Pum S/c Pandu Nayak, Aqe: 55 Years, C)cc ftarcu{sre, Fçfa Naqarai Vflaae, Tq: Chnco. Dst.Guibarqa.
2.
Manik S/a Pt3fldu Nayak. Age: 58 Years, Ccc: Aquicfture,
R/o Nagar& ‘IWage, Tq; Circhofl. Dst; Gubarga. (By Sr AMNaor&, Aóvoca) A Ni): 1,
The State a! Karnaaka. Trrç:or Department, NSLdHrq, Bargaere.
2.
The Deout:’; Comnnssoner. Cu 3 a rg a,
..Pethoners
$3
ttçz
C3ff:er, and Assstar; Cornssir!er Maor & Mcr 1rMqaton D?;rtrent.
Gu}barg. 4,
The Super tendrt Ereer, Water Resource Dep;frtmenç
!rnqatons k:
CIPE?
ha it a. S.
The r1 nacng t)rector, Katrak r’!Lavar: h3?3(n 4 Ktce E32d [k1flq, Dr13.R:Ambedkar B 3 sq a ore.
6.
The (e Ereer,
Karnat3ka N:ravan Neam Ltd, C’
7
Gd:
The EJKecutdve Engmeer, Kamataka Nrvar Niqam Lcd.,
IPC, Sulepeth. Tq Chnchofl, Dist b!J!)arQa.
.
Respondents
Sn Shivakumar Tengh, AGA for R4 to R4 Sh Gotrsh S
haStb3iflD:r. Athocete for R5 to R7)
These wht oet !ons are Ned under Artds 226 and 22? or e Consttut}o of incBa praying to sue a wr:t of naGdamus.
arectinq the res2oroent:s x: wfthraw the acquiston procee;r:as which was acquhied n respect uf Lard Sy.No.41 rneasuriuc 13 acres 32. çu utas situated at Nacar& VR}a.e, Tq Chncho, Dst: Gubar;a and aso direct the resGonder!t o take back tflo comDenu3ton whch was received Yy the etones and ret&n the Droperty whk:h s nut used These wnt oetUons c:umrg or tot preunnary earr:ç.
‘B’ ç3roup ths day, the Court made the foflawing:
;!
.3
The oetfto13ers have fec! these oettiors seeko the Vv tnd ?W&
he’e
csf t e a
&so
.ison
Guqi-i: a
tro
t
-
writ of nM3r:oamus
to
represEmtatons, dated i45.2OO 1 cAnnexure (AnnxL;re
(Anne>ure
Di),
—
iZL52Oi1
Annexure
D3) ari 28l.2Qi 1 (Arnexure
‘qu st3o amsi5er
their
rY, 24S2Olt 02),
12J3,2011
-.
2. Sri A.MJWqr&, the ‘earned cvnse tar the pehU oE3ers subrnfts th3t the acquistion notfic:atEon was issue d in resped:
01
the pettners’ flCiS for the pumose of Mul la Mar Project. However, n the course or imperrientaton of ih
found that the petUoners’
project, it was
3n(:IsI3re no requ3recL
He submtE;
that the pettores coitinue to be in nossessos of the ‘ands. He
suhmfts that the
peitoners re
reeab{e to
return
te
cornpens;t:on mcints to th Cove n:’nent and that tierehre a air cton t3e
;i;ucc! o tn
.t to
eave the !nds with
the ;‘et1oners,
3.
5fl
tr:varum3r
3gH,
the
e;3rned
Addtona3
Government Advocite apeanrm for he respo ndent Nos.! t{) 4 submits that once the award s passed and uois sesson s taken;
the qt3E3toO Of rcSl:ornq the ‘ands to the
et;tonerswot3(i not
a!is’2 at alL
4. Jr. is triL€ 3Ostofl h aw that the ‘and :ai he withdrawn from the acowston any trne before te possessior is taken. Once the possession of the acquired bnd s taken, the questio n
of drooping the accuisftion oroceednqs wosG riot arise.
Once
the notificion under Section 16(2) of the LEind Acquh;Won Act,
1894 is issued, it wouct he the evidence of the fa-
u
•t:
-‘
:c5
C 4—i
C: Cs.i
CL
t03 Z
U, C) r’z
—F
5i
0
-4-I -.
z2 4-.?
0
-c 4-’
433 >
r
‘
9 C) 0% ‘11•
‘V El ‘-
V C 0
0 V El U,
‘a;
‘V
(j3 ca
F’ —
4!;
C) C
n —