Idea Transcript
Implementing a Strategic Highway Transportation Asset Management System at UDOT
Jeffrey L. Zavitski, B.A. Asset Management Specialist Deighton Associates Limited & Kim Schvaneveldt, P.E., Asset Management Director UDOT
6th National Conference on Transportation Asset Management Kansas City, Missouri, November 1-3, 2005
UDOT Asset Management Implementation
Today’s Presentation: •
Introduction
•
The “Asset Management Paradox”
•
The Implementation Project
•
UDOT’s Planning Process
•
Asset Management Software
•
Conclusions
Introduction
Introduction: Asset Management - UDOT
I – 15 Design Build Project: •
$1.59 Billion Project – 17 mile mainline interstate through Salt Lake City Corridor
•
130 structures – 3 major junctions with other freeways and 7 major urban interchanges
•
Following completion: Legislature challenged UDOT to decide between UDOT Maintenance or a Private Maintenance Contract (PMC) for the new facility.
•
UDOT chose to continue UDOT maintenance and to implement an asset management system.
Introduction: Asset Management - Deighton
Deighton Associates Limited: •
Located in Ontario, Canada;
•
World wide partners and distributors;
•
Asset Management system development and implementation since 1984 at the Federal, Provincial, State, Region and Municipal levels;
•
Working with UDOT since 1991.
•
Data integration and analysis software tools and expertise to empower asset managers.
Introduction: UDOT and Deighton
Initial Project Development: •
Discussions commenced Summer of 2002
•
Deighton software at UDOT
•
Deighton was hired to develop the project scope and outline the framework for the asset management system implementation at UDOT.
•
Initial discussions regarding the goals and objectives of the project as well as the scope, task, and deliverables resulted in the discovery of the “Asset Management Paradox”.
The Asset Management Paradox
The Asset Management Paradox
Data
Data
+
+
Integration
Integration
+
+
Analysis
Analysis
is
is not
Asset Management
Asset Management
The Asset Management Paradox
“An asset management system can not be implemented in any agency unless that agency first adopts best practice asset management.” “An asset management system is not necessarily in itself good asset management”
The Asset Management Paradox
“An agency uses asset management so it can deliver a safe, efficient and reliable transportation service to its community. At the same time, an agency uses an asset management system so it can use a systematic practical approach to practicing asset management.”
The Implementation Project
The Implementation Project
Project History 2002 through to the present: • Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope – Asset Management Team – Asset Management Strategic Plan And Implementation Plan
• Phase 2: Proof of Concept – Will the Asset Management System deliver results?
• Phase 3: System Implementation over 4 years. – – – – –
Pavements Bridges Safety Mobility Maintenance features
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
AM Exec Committee
Organizational Framework
AM Committee •
AM Team UDOT & Deighton
•
AM Committee
•
AM Exec. Committee
•
Nested Relationship
AM Team
Glen A. Ames, P.E. UDOT Asset Management Engineer, Asset Management Jump Start, (TRB Conference, November 2005)
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
Incremental Development Methodology
Appropriate Level
Functionality
Time IDM © Deighton Associates Limited, 2002
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
International Asset Management Guide NCHRP: Asset Managment Guide
Other Asset Management Literature
Asset Management Best Practice Components
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
Asset Management Best Practice Components
Self - Assessment Survey
UDOTs Desired Asset Management Components
Develop/Adjust Asset Management System’s Goals & Objectives
UDOT’s Asset Management Strategy
UDOT’s Asset Management Plan
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
Accomplishments: •
NCHRP 20 – 24 Self Assessment Survey Modified and distributed;
•
Survey results reviewed and presented;
•
Asset Management Strategy developed and published
•
Asset Management Implementation Plan developed and published
•
Multi-phase dTIMS CT Asset Management System Implementation Plan developed
Phase 1: Strategy, Plan and Scope
Lessons learned from Phase 1: •
The survey is only a “menu” of best practice components;
•
Survey respondents will take an active role in implementing the selected best practice components;
•
Asset Management System is one part of Asset Management;
•
Strategy and Plan will cover many years, adoption will not happen overnight.
•
There is no “silver bullet” solution.
Phase 2: Proof of Concept
Demonstrate the Asset Management System Analysis •
Could the AMS deliver the results?
•
Could Deighton demonstrate the AMS “cross asset analysis and optimization”.
•
Could UDOT get answers to the questions being asked by the legislature: – Effect on asset condition with a 15% increase in funding? – Effect on asset condition with a 15% decrease in funding? – Effect on asset condition with a trade – off of Maintenance and Preservation dollars against congestion mitigation dollars?
Phase 2: Proof of Concept
Demonstrate the Asset Management System Analysis Operational Level Bridge Analysis: Total Needs Condition Distribution 100
100
90
90
80
Bridges
80
Sign Replacement Strategies
70
70
Signs
100.00 60
60
90.00 50
50
20
10
0
40
70.00 60.00
30
50.00
45
40.00
40
Replace 0% Replace 5%
Operational Level Drainage Analysis Replace 10%Results Replace 15% Replace 20% Replace 25% Replace 30%
20
10
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 30 2019 2020 2021 2022
20.00 10.00
Very Poor
Replace 35% Replace 100%
35
30.00
Remaining Service Life
30
Overall Sign Condition Index
80.00 40
Analysis Year
Poor
0.00 2002
Fair
Good
Excel
0
Drainage Operational Level Pavement Analysis: Total Needs Condition Distribution
100
25
100
90
2009
90
Do-Nothing Maximize Benefit
20 2016
80
80
70
70
60
60
2023
15 Analysis Year 10 5 0 2000
2005
2010
50
2015
Analysis Year
2020
50
2025
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Analysis Year Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
0
Pavements
Phase 3: AMS Implementation
Phase 3: Implement the AMS •
Pavements and Bridges completed in 2003
•
Safety and Mobility completed in 2004
•
Maintenance Features currently being implemented
•
AMS includes:
W yn ko op St A ra pa B ho Law La Ma lak e re rim kr e e n t e S St c e r St t St
Broadway
Br oadway
St
W Colfax Av LANE
E Colfax Av
W elt o G n le St na rm lP C ou tr Pl
W Colfax Av E Colfax Av (section perspective)
623
E 14thAv
972
E
13th Av
E 14thAv E
13th Av
rm lP
G le na
St
St
St
St
(point perspective)
W 14th Av Highways Av
Broadway
th
St
h
14 2 W 14th Av th 0t Bridges St h BRIDGE W Av E 17th Av St 13th E 20th Av
INVENTORY
13th
St
rd 23
St 20 th
(lane section perspective) W 14th Av E 17th Av Signs, Culverts, W Other... 13th Av
W
20 th
St E 20th Av W Colfax Av
t 15
h
St
15
rd 23 St St St th th th 17 19 1 8
t 15
14 th
14 th
rd 23
St
lvd rB ee Sp
St St St th th th 17 19 18 d
• strategic analysis module
6 St 01e 1a0ze 36 W 200
d r Blv ee 41 Sp 3 10
• cross asset analysis and optimization
e ze a W
St
r Blv ee Sp
• stovepipe type
e ze a W
St St St th th h 19 18t 17
– Asset Management Analysis –
W yn ko op St A ra pa B C M L C St ha Cu ho aw La a lak a ou m rt e r r k i re m e e lifo t i W pa s S nc e t S rn W r S t yn S t e t ia elt St t ko o o G n p tS t le St St tS S na A r ap rm C ah La L M Bla C lP C S C h ou a tou am utr o w ar ark ke lifo t im G e tr is r e e p le rn a St St n ce er t St St Pl na W iea St rm lt l P G on t le St tS S t S na rm C lP C C C S h ou al tou am urt G if o t rt l pa is S rn Pl ena t ia rm lP tS t S tS
– Asset Management Database – provides the data integration E 20th Av
E 17th Av
E Colfax Av E 14thAv E
13th Av
UDOT’s Planning Process
UDOT’s Planning Process Organizational Structure
Strategic Planning
Tactical Planning
Day to Day Operations Pavement
Bridge
Signs
Safety
HORIZONTAL Integration D a ta d es cr ib in g a l l a ss e ts i n teg r a ted in to o n e a s s et m a n a g e m e n t d a ta b a s e
Mobility
Q uality inform ation provided from strategic to operation al levels fro m o ne asset m anagem en t database
VERTICALIntegration
Stakeholders
UDOT’s Planning Process Region Input and Network Data
Pavement Data and Models
Structure Data and Models
Other Data and Models
Tactical Level Analysis
Asset Management Strategic Analysis
Strategic Goals -----
Strategic Level Budget Recommendations
Strategic Level Analysis
TRANSMAT / Commission Approval
Performance Measures -----
Pavements
Structures
Safety
Program
Program
Program
Revenue Projections
Project Harmonization Regions & Asset Groups
Harmonized Project Recommendations
Planning
Tactical Level Analysis Harmonization
Long Range Plan Development
UDOT’s Planning Process Project Harmonization Regions & Asset Groups
Harmonized Project Recommendations
Planning
Long Range Plan Development
Corridor Development Plan
Long Range Plan
UDOT’s Planning Process
UDOT Planning and Programming Schedule Planning and Programming Component Long Range Plan - 30 Years Short Range Plan - 10 Years Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan - 5 Years
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 ➾
➾
➾ ➾
➾ ➾
➾
➾ ➾
➾
The Asset Management System Software
AMS : Framework Local Asset Group Area User
Local Asset Group Area User
M ain ta ins
M ain ta ins
Legacy System
ODBC
Im po rt
Legacy System
dT IM S ™ C T Asset Management Database
CENTRAL INTEGRATED DATABASE
CROSS ASSET ANALYSIS & OPTIMIZATION Analysis
1 2 Raw Data 1 2 3 4 5 6
Models
ID FR TO DATA
Historical Data 1 2 3 4 5 6
Inventory
Treatments
Performance
ASSET MANAGEMENT WEB SITE System Status
System Plan
Specifications
Procedures
Data Dictionary
Asset Information
Costs
S
1 2 3 4 5 6
GIS
AMS : dTIMS CT Software
• dTIMS CT Desktop • dTIMS CT Enterprise • MS SQL Sever • Oracle (2007)
AMS : dTIMS CT Software
• User Defined Database • User Defined Analysis • Any Asset • Highways • Railways • Airports • Utility sector
AMS : “Stovepipe Type” Analysis
AMS : Cross Asset Optimization Model
AMS : Cross Asset Optimization Model
Future Developments and Conclusions
Future Developments and Conclusions
Future Developments •
Additional Strategic Level Performance Measures – Economy – Society – Environment
•
Additional Analysis Methodologies – Optimization Objective Functions – Asset Value – User Costs – Risk
•
Additional Assets
Future Developments and Conclusions
Conclusions •
Asset management strategy and implementation plan are the starting points in any asset management implementation;
•
Asset Management Team must include Senior Management and have their support;
•
An asset management system is not necessarily in itself good asset management;
•
Asset management necessitates a well defined planning process to ensue actions relate directly to the asset management goals and objectives of the agency outlined in its strategic plan;
•
Incremental Development focuses on Pragmatism before Perfection.
Thank you.
www.deighton.com