In the Matter of: Felix O'Neill Rippy - IN.gov [PDF]

Oct 7, 2016 - In the Matter of: Felix O'Neill Rippy,. Respondent. Supreme Court Case No. 49S00-1608-DI-456. Published Or

6 downloads 6 Views 97KB Size

Recommend Stories


Schellenberger Felix und Jasmin – felix
Silence is the language of God, all else is poor translation. Rumi

original in the matter of the suspension
Everything in the universe is within you. Ask all from yourself. Rumi

the weil-felix reaction in typhus fever
Don't fear change. The surprise is the only way to new discoveries. Be playful! Gordana Biernat

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of
Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. Matsuo Basho

A Matter of Trust PDF
If you feel beautiful, then you are. Even if you don't, you still are. Terri Guillemets

Heart of the Matter
The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now. Chinese Proverb

The Aesthetics of Matter
Learn to light a candle in the darkest moments of someone’s life. Be the light that helps others see; i

The Matter of Heartbleed
What you seek is seeking you. Rumi

Felix(Zheng)
You're not going to master the rest of your life in one day. Just relax. Master the day. Than just keep

Felix Robinson
Be who you needed when you were younger. Anonymous

Idea Transcript


In the

Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of: Felix O’Neill Rippy, Respondent

Supreme Court Case No. 49S00-1608-DI-456

FILED Oct 07 2016, 2:49 pm

CLERK

Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court

Published Order Imposing Reciprocal Discipline The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a verified “Notice of Foreign Discipline and Petition for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause,” advising that Respondent was disciplined in the State of Texas and requesting, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28), that reciprocal discipline be imposed in this state. On August 25, 2016, this Court issued an “Order to Show Cause,” to which Respondent has responded. On September 21, 2016, the Commission filed a reply to Respondent’s response. Respondent was admitted to practice law in Indiana and in Texas. On April 18, 2016, the District 8 Grievance Committee of the State Bar of Texas entered an agreed judgment of probated suspension under which Respondent was suspended in Texas for 18 months, with the suspension fully probated, effective May 1, 2016. The Court finds that there has been no showing, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28)(c), of any reason why reciprocal discipline should not be issued in this state. Being duly advised, the Court orders Respondent suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in this state as of the date of this order. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent. If Respondent is reinstated to practice in Texas, Respondent may file a “Motion for Reinstatement” pursuant to and in full compliance with Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28)(e), provided there is no other suspension order in effect at the time. Reinstatement in Indiana shall be subject to compliance with the terms of Respondent’s probation in Texas as determined by that jurisdiction. Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, on ___________.

Loretta H. Rush Chief Justice of Indiana All Justices concur.

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.