Kim et al [PDF]

Plane Strain vs Plane Stress: M(T). 9. • Plane strain and plane ... For overmatching, solutions for plane strain and p

0 downloads 16 Views 5MB Size

Recommend Stories


Kim-Muller et al. revision
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that

Complaint: CFTC v. Brian Kim, et al
Be who you needed when you were younger. Anonymous

Iqbal et al pdf
I want to sing like the birds sing, not worrying about who hears or what they think. Rumi

Shahwar et al pdf
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world. Anne

Wanjohi et al pdf
So many books, so little time. Frank Zappa

Matias et al pdf
The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now. Chinese Proverb

Rong et al. pdf
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that

Shabbir et al pdf
It always seems impossible until it is done. Nelson Mandela

Mphahlele et al pdf
I tried to make sense of the Four Books, until love arrived, and it all became a single syllable. Yunus

Govindappa et al PDF
You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take. Wayne Gretzky

Idea Transcript


Mismatch Limit Load Solutions for Circumferential Cracked Pipes

ESIS TC1 Autumn Meeting December 5-6, Freiburg Yun-Jae Kim Mechanical Engineering Dept Korea University Seoul, Korea

2

Significance of Mis-Match Limit Loads  Elastic-plastic J estimates for mismatched structures  use of mismatch limit loads important

Through-wall cracked welded plates under tension

Normalized by homogeneous limit loads

Normalized by Mismatch limit loads

3

Existing Works: Mismatch Limit Loads (1)  Planar geometry (2-D plane strain and plane stress)

• Mismatch Effect on Plastic Yield Loads in Idealised Weldments: Part I – Weld Metal Cracks, EFM, 68(2), 2001, 163-182. • Mismatch Effect on Plastic Yield Loads in Idealised Weldments: Part II – HAZ Cracks. EFM 68(2), 2001, 183-199. • Compendium of Yield Load Solutions for Strength Mis-matched DE(T), SE(B) and C(T) Specimens. EFM 68(9), 2001, 1137-1151.

4

Existing Works: Mismatch Limit Loads (2)  Planar geometry (3-D plates)

 Pipe geometry

Mismatch limit loads for tensile plates with constant-depth surface cracks in the center of welds. IJF 148(4), 343-360, 2007

Strength mis-match effect on limit loads for surface cracked pipes. EFM 76(8), 1074-1086, 2009.

 Existing solutions are for idealized cases: rectangular weld shapes  The weld shape effect on mismatch limit load solutions need to be quantified

5

Scope of Presentation  Review essence of existing solutions  M(T) solutions: 2-D plane strain and plane stress  Report intermediate results:  Effect of the V-groove weld shape  Summary of on-going works

6

Mismatched M(T) Plate: Variables

 Normalized mismatch limit load

FLM FLB

 Mismatch limit loads depend on

σYW

weld

 strength mismatch ratio M=

 weld slenderness

σYB

base

ψ=(w-c)/h Effect of weld shape

σ YW σ YB

7

Characteristics of Mismatch Limit Loads Plastic deformation patterns

M·FYB

FYB

FYB

M·FYB

8

Mismatch Limit Loads for Plane Strain M(T)

overmatching

ψ1 depends on M and geometry

Undermatching

9

Plane Strain vs Plane Stress: M(T)

• Plane strain and plane stress different mainly for under-matching  due to different plastic deformation patterns

10

Mismatch Limit Loads for 3-D M(T) Plates Mismatch limit loads for tensile plates with constant-depth surface cracks in the center of welds. IJF 148(4), 343-360, 2007

Through-wall crack

Surface crack

• For overmatching, solutions for plane strain and plane stress similar  2-D solutions can be used for 3-D plates • For undermatching, solutions are different  Mismatch limit loads should be in between plane strain and plane stress depending on w/t ratio

11

Finite Element Limit Analyses weld stress

base strain

ABAQUS • Elastic-perfectly plastic material • Small strain option • Limit analysis

12

Through-Wall Cracks

w/t=1- close to plane strain

w/t=20 - close to plane stress

13

Through-Wall Cracks

w/t=5- closer to plane stress

w/t=10 - close to plane stress

14

Surface Cracks Definition of the slenderness parameter ψ ? Two limiting cases

ψ =

(w − c) h

ψ

t − a) ( = h

 The slenderness parameter for surface crack should include (w-c)/h and (t-a)/h

15

Choice of ψ: Examples

• Neither ψ=(w-c)/h nor ψ=(t-a)/h could correlate mismatch limit load data for surface cracked plates

16

Calibrated Parameter ψeff for Surface Cracks 1  ( t − a) ( w − c )  + ψ eff =   f h h    w  a  w 2 g − 1 − 0.5 + g        t        t   t f= −2  g  w  − 1   a − 0.5  + g  w     t     t      t   w w g   = 0.13   + 2.37  t   t 

0≤

a ≤ 0.5 t

0.5 ≤

a ≤ 1.0 t

17

Mismatch Limit Loads for Surface Cracks

18

Mismatch Limit Loads for Circumferential Cracked Pipes Strength mis-match effect on limit loads for surface cracked pipes. EFM 76(8), 1074-1086, 2009.

• Based on plastic deformation patterns, mismatch limit load solutions should be similar to those of M(T) plates • For through-wall cracks, plane stress solutions may be relevant • For surface cracks, plane strain solutions may be more relevant

19

Finite Element Limit Analyses weld stress

base strain

ABAQUS • Elastic-perfectly plastic material • Small strain option • Limit analysis

20

Through-Wall Cracks

ψ=

r (π − θ ) h

Plane stress M(T)

(

)

ψ 1 = 1 + 0.43exp −5( M −1) exp−( M −1) / 5

for plane stress M(T)  M − 5.2   3  

ψ 1 = exp  −

for TWC pipes

Normalized mismatch limit loads Similar to plane stress M(T)

21

Fully Circumferential Surface Cracks

ψ=

(t − a ) h

Plane strain M(T)

 Normalized mismatch limit loads similar to plane strain M(T)  ( M − 1)  ψ 1 = exp  −  5    2 ( M − 1)   5  

ψ 1 = exp  −

for plane strain M(T)

for fully circumferential cracked pipes

22

Surface Cracks Fully circumferential crack solutions Through-wall crack solutions

t − a) ( ψ= h

ψ=

( t − a ) + 5 cos  θ  − sin θ  h

 

  2

2 

23

Surface Cracks t − a) (   θ  sin θ  ψ= + 5 cos   −  h



2

2 

Fully circumferential crack solutions Through-wall crack solutions

 Using a proper definition of ψ, fully circumferential crack solutions can be used for surface cracks

24

Surface Cracks

25

Effect of V-Groove on Mismatch Limit Loads  Circumferential Cracked Pipes with V-Groove Butt Welds • Parametric Study: Matrix V-Groove

Cases Φ

45, 90

r/t

5, 20

M

0.5, 2.0

a/t

0.35, 0.5, 0.8, 1

θ/π

0.25, 0.5, 0.8, 1

h/t

0.125, 0.5

• Circumferential through-wall crack under axial tension (N) or bending (M) • Fully circumferential surface crack under axial tension (N) • Surface crack under axial tension (N)

26

Circumferential Through-Wall Cracks

Φ r/t M a/t θ/π h/t

• Slenderness parameter

CASE 45, 90 5, 20 0.5, 2.0 1 0.25, 0.5, 0.8 0.125, 0.5

r (π − θ ) ψ eff = heff

h eff = h+(t × tan(φ /2))/2 Mean weld width

27

Results  Effect of slenderness parameter: Groove angle= 90°

ψ = f ( h)

ψ = f (heff )

28

Results: Effect of r/t

r/t=5

r/t=10

r/t=20

29

On-Going Works  Circumferential cracked pipes with V-groove welds  Surface crack  Effect of crack location

 Effect of V-groove for plates  Mismatch limit loads for plates under bi-axial loading

Thank You Very Much

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.