Los Alamos [PDF]

Behavior of PMMA and Polycarbonate Polymers ... lower than metals, low elastic modulus pressure bars (e.g. ... The compr

0 downloads 7 Views 3MB Size

Recommend Stories


Los Alamos
The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together.

Los Alamos, New Mexico
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world. Anne

Los Alamos National Laboratory
Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that

c* Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New M
It always seems impossible until it is done. Nelson Mandela

Los Alamos Invasive Species Plan
Be who you needed when you were younger. Anonymous

Los Alamos Operations, November 2011
Forget safety. Live where you fear to live. Destroy your reputation. Be notorious. Rumi

Los Alamos Week Ending April 21, 2017
The greatest of richness is the richness of the soul. Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)

Isotope Production Facility, Los Alamos National Lab
Just as there is no loss of basic energy in the universe, so no thought or action is without its effects,

Enterprise Assessments Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory
You can never cross the ocean unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore. Andrè Gide

GEOTHERMAL WELL LOGGING EQUIPMENT DEVELOPED AT LOS ALAMOS, AND PROVIDED
This being human is a guest house. Every morning is a new arrival. A joy, a depression, a meanness,

Idea Transcript


LA-URApproved forpublic release; distribution is unlimited.

Title:

[nfluence of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Compressive Behavior of PMMA and Polycarbonate Polymers

Author(s). W.R. BLUMENTHAL, C.M. CADY, M.F. LOPEZ, G.T. GRAY

[II, and D.J. IDAR

MST-8

Submitted to.

12th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter June 24-29,2001 Atlanta, GA

Los Alamos ION NAT

A L LA I30 RAT0 RY

Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmativeaction/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the Universityof California for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36.By acceptanceof this article, the publisher recognizesthat the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free licenseto publish or reproduce the publishedform of this contribution,or to allow others to do SO,for US. Government purposes. Los Alamos NationalLaboratoryrequests that the publisher identify this article as work performedunder the auspices of the U.S. Departmentof Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publicationor guarantee its technicalcorrectness. Form 836 (10/96)

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AND STRAIN RATE ON THE COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF PMMA AND POLYCARBONATE POLYMERS W.R. IHumenthal, C.M. Cady, M.F. Lopez, G.T. Gray 111 and D.J. Idar Mail Stop G-755, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545

Abstract. Compression stress-strain measurements have been made on commercial polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polycarbonate (PC) polymers as a function of tcmperature (-197°C to 220°C) and strain rate. A split-Hopkinson-pressurebar (SJIPU) was used to achieve strain rates of about 2500 s-’ and a servohydraulic tester was used for lower strain rate testing (0.001 to 5 s-’). The mechanical response of these transparent polymers is quite different. The strength of PC is weakly dependent on strain rate, only moderately dependent on temperature, and remains ductile to -197OC. In contrast, the strength of PMMA is linearly dependent on temperature and strongly dependent on strain rate. Significantly, PMMA develops cracking and fails in compression with little ductility ( 7 4 % total strain) at either low strain rates and very low temperatures (-197OC) or at high strain rates and temperatures very near ambient. INTRODUCTION

Transparent, thermoplastic polymers such as polycarbonate (PC) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) are very common in a range of commercial products and defense applications. In particular, these materials are uscd in components where their mechanical behavior is of critical interest to designers and engineers, such as impactresistant eyewear and aircraft windows. Because components may be subject to extreme temperature and loading conditions, there is a need to test and accurately model the constitutive mechanical behavior as a fbnction of bolh strain rate and temperature. The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) is an established high strain rate test method for metals, but it has also been applied to evaluate polymers. However, due to many differences between the behavior of metals and polymers, the authors have modified the standard SHPB technique to improve the validity and fidelity of the results [I]. Specifically, because of their low sound speeds, the thickness of polymeric specimens must be reduced to achieve rapid stress uniformity within the specimen. Also, because polymer strength is much

lower than metals, low elastic modulus pressure bars (e.g. titanium or magnesium alloys) must be used to obtain adequate strain gage signal output. The compressive strength of PMMA and PC has been previously studied as a function of strain rate but almost exclusively at room temperature [2-41. The authors have specifically developed the capability to dynamically test materials over a wide temperature range, allowing study of thermal effects on the strength of polymers. In general, the compressive strength and the loading modulus of polymeric materials have been observed to increase with decreasing temperature and with increasing strain rate. PC can be compressed to strains in excess of 50% at all strain rates at room temperature and the strain-rate dependence of the strength is weak, but appears to increase and then saturate or even soften at dynamic rates (>1O3 s-’) [temperature [2, 41. The strength of PMMA exhibits strong strain rate dependence compared to PC at room temperature. Significantly, at low strain rates PMMA is ductile to large strains (with strength levels similar to PC); however at dynamic strain rates (?lo3 s”) the strength of PMMA increases dramatically and becomes brittle at room temperature [2]. The strength of PMMA also

r:

ap ears to4 lose strength at very high rates between 10 to 10 s- , but this is likely a result of a nonuniform stress in the specimen [3]. In the present investigation, uniaxial compression tests were performed at a series o i constant strain rates (0.001, 0.1, 5, -2000 s-I) and at temperatures ranging from -197°C to 200°C commerciallyavailable polycarbonate and polymethylmethacrylate to support the development of rate and temperaturedependent constitutive strength models. The results are discussed in comparison to selected literature data at ambient temperature. EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES Materials and Preparation The bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) specimens were sampled from a one-inch thick compressionmolded and stress-relieved sheet of unfilled, unmodified ZELUX M-machine grade polycarbonate and the polyinethylmethacrylate (PMMA) specimens were sampled from a one-inch thick extruded sheet of ACRYLITE FF grade acrylic (both are manufactured by Westlake Plastics, Placentia, CA; www.westlakep1astics.com). Both materials were machined so that the specimen compression axis was parallel to the throughthickness direction of the sheets. SHPB specimens were machined with dimensions of 6.35nim diameter and 3.2mm length. Quasi-static compression specimens were machined to a diameter of 6.35mm and a length of 6.35mm. Specimen faces were machined to a fine surface finish to minimize friction during the test. Off-ambient temperature specimens were ramped to the desired temperature in approximately 5 to 10 minutes and then equilibrated at temperature for approximately 10 minutes prior to testing. Samples were lubricated with a thin layer of molybdenum disulfide grease or, at - 197"C, with a thin spray coating of boron nitride. Low Strain Kate Compression Testing

Quasi-static compression tests were conducted on both PC and PMMA at temperature intervals of approximately 20°C from -55°C to +55"C and also at -197°C using a MTS (Eden Prairie, MN) model

880 load frame and ram extensometer at strain rates of 0,001, 0.1, and 5 s-I. Specimens were loaded to strains of between 20% to 30% in air unless failure occurred. Specimens tested at -197°C were immersed in a liquid nitrogen bath during the test. High Strain Rate Compression Testing Dynamic tests were conducted on both materials at strain rates of 2000 to 4000 s.' utilizing a splitHopkinson pressure bar with 9.4mm diameter Ti6Al-4V alloy pressure bars to improve the signal-tonoise output. Development of a uniform stress state within the specimen early in the loading is a necessary requirement for valid SHPB testing, especially when fracture occurs at low strain levels. This condition was satisfied for each test by comparing stress-strain curves calculated from the incident-reflected signals and the transmitted strain signal as described elsewhere [I]. Stress equilibrium for these materials was satisfied in all cases at total strain levels below about 3%. Minimizing the specimen thickness is critical for achieving rapid stress equilibrium, but we have also found that it is not possible to achieve acceptable stress equilibrium for these polymers above strain rates of about 6000 s-' even using a specimen thickness of 3.2mm. Finally, an assumption of incompressibility was made for these materials so that the results are calculated and shown as true stress and true strain. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Bisphenol A Polycarbonate (PC) Room temperature stress-strain curves for PC are plotted in Fig. 1 over the range of strain rates. These results show that PC is very weakly dependent on strain rate up to 5 s-', but the rate sensitivity accelerates between 5 and 2000 s.'. Specifically, the peak strength at 20°C increases by only 16% from 0,001 to 5 s-', but then increases by 38% from 5 to 2000 s-I. Figure 1 also shows that the shape of the stress-strain curve for PC is consistent as a fbnction of strain rate with an initial strength peak at between 6 to 8% strain, followed by a gradual strength-softening region out to at least 30% strain.

Tests were not taken to strain larger than 30%, so that a transition to a work-hardening mode observed in the literature was not confirmed. However, these stress-strain curves are otherwise in good agreement with prior studies [2,4].

?.e

!

PC

~ ~

, ......................

..&i.Y

; -

$200

E

,

v)

2

150

3

c

100

0.00

v)

v)

-55c. 0.001 l/s

20c,2000 l/S

._-.- 20c, 0.001 l/s 55'2,2300 l/s

..~ ~~.~

..........

55c,0.001l/s

' ;

I ~

~

~

;

0.10

0.20 True Strain

I

0.30

FIGURE 2. The compressive strength of PC is moderately temperature dependent.

50

O

-197C,0.001 I/s -55C, 3600 11s

....;,i........i...i..i.............. 0 1

v

9 I-

~

:lo

h

e! tj

~

1-

h

v)

!g

....... -

, _ .........

300

I 0.10

0.00

True Strain

0.20

400

0.30

FIGURE 1. The strain rate sensitivity of polycarbonate (PC) is

weak at 20°C.

Fig. 2 shows that the compressive strength of PC is moderately temperature dependent, particularly at low temperatures and in combination with highstrain-rate loading. Interestingly, the low strain rate strength at 197°C is comparable to the high-strainrate strength tit -55OC. It will be shown later that a similar low temperature-high strain rate relationship exists with PMMA.

-

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) The room temperature compressive stress-strain response PMMA is shown in Fig. 3 for a range of strain rates. Again the shape of the stress-strain curves are similar with an initial strength pcak between 6 to 8% strain, however both the magnitude of the strength and the strength-softening behavior is now strongly strain rate dependent. Specifically, the peak strength of PMMA increases by a factor of 3 between a strain rate of 0.001 and 2200 s-' at room temperature.

I

rFMMA @ 20°C L-____----J

I

a

2

0.00

5

t/s

l/s

..... 0.001 l/s

2

Y

c 100

2200 11s

-0.1

; ; i300

E 200 3

-

.......... . .-.;............. . . ..:...:............. 0.10

True Strain

0.20

0.30

FIGURE 3. The room temperature compressive strength of PMMA is strongly strain rate dependent.

Figure 4 is a plot of strength versus temperature for PMMA at a constant strain rate of 0.001 s.'. This result demonstrates a very linear temperature dependence of the peak strength of PMMA down to very low temperatures. However at - 197°C the peak strength is truncated due to failure of the specimen. Also note that there is much less strain-softening of PMMA compare to PC at low strain rates. Figure 5 shows a similar linear temperature dependence of the peak strength at high strain rates. The strainsoftening behavior of PMMA at high strain rates is also very temperature dependent and becomes stronger with decreasing temperature. In addition,

cracks develop under room temperature loading and complete specimen failure occurs below about 10°C. Again it is interesting to note that the quasistatic response at -197°C and the high strain rate behavior at -60°C are nearly identical. 500

^ 1 _ _

3 400 a H

Y

rn

v)

300

: a,

...

...

L.

PMMA 0 0.001 s

-'

-20°C

200 100 0 0.00

0.10

Truestrain .

0.30

0.20

8

-55°C

c L

E

Note that the quasi-static x-axis intercept of 299°K corresponds closely to the measured glasstransition temperature of Kel-F 800TMof 301°K and that the x-axis intercept at high strain rates (350°K) is a roaching the melting temperature of Kel-F 800 (378'K) (5).

FIGURE 4. The peak strength of P M M is linearly dependent on temperature at low strain rates. Failure at low strain occurs at liquid nitrogen temperatures.

Figure 4 is a plot of flow stress (at 10% strain) versus temperature for Kel-F 800TM that demonstrates linear temperature dependencies at both high and low strain rates. High strain rate loading increases the temperature dependence (slope) of the flow stress and shifts the line to higher stress (or, equivalently, to higher temperatures).

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions can be drawn. First, the compressive stress-strain response of PMMA and PC are very different as a function of both temperature and strain rate. Second, the strength of PC is weakly dependent on strain rate, only moderately dependent on temperature, and remains ductile to at least -197°C under low strain rate loading. Third, in contrast to PC, the strength of PMMA is linearly dependent on temperature and strongly dependent on strain rate. Finally, PMMA develops cracking and fails in compression with little ductility (7-8% total strain) at either low strain rates and very low temperatures (-197OC) or at high strain rates near ambient temperatures. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was performed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (contract W-7405-ENG-36).

500 I

-m

400

--

-_ 'I

tu

h

$ 300

......

I

-60°C 20°C 60°C 150°C 200°C

REFERENCES 1 . Gray 111, G.T. and W.R. Blumenthal, Split-Hopkinson pressure 'bar testing of soft materials, in ASM Handbook. Vol. 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, H. Kuhn and D. Medlin, Editors. 2000, ASM International: Materials Park, Ohio. p. 488-

v)

E 3

u)

2" +

200

496. 2.Li, 2. and J. Lambros, Strain rate effects on the

--L-.

100 -1

0

0.00

0.10

True Strain

0.20

0.30

FIGURE 5. The peak strength of PMMA is also nearly linearly dependent on temperature at high strain rates. However, cracking and failure occurs at temperatures very near room temperature.

thermomechanical behavior of polymers. Int. J. Solids and Structures, 2001. 38: p. 3549-3562. 3. Walley, S.M., et al., A Study of the Rapid Deformation-Behavior of a Range of Polymers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-Physical Sciences and Engineering, 1989. 328(1597): p. 1-33. 4. Walley, S.M. and J.E. Field, Strain rate sensitivity o f polymers in compression from low to high rates. DYMAT Journal, 1994. l(3): p. 21 1-227.

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.