Monetary Policy - Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland [PDF]

Dec 1, 2004 - They reveal a substantial shift in the expected fed funds rate two years and more in the future. Weak inco

6 downloads 7 Views 267KB Size

Recommend Stories


Untitled - Federal Reserve Bank
Don't ruin a good today by thinking about a bad yesterday. Let it go. Anonymous

Untitled - Federal Reserve Bank
Love only grows by sharing. You can only have more for yourself by giving it away to others. Brian

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. Mich

Untitled - Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
At the end of your life, you will never regret not having passed one more test, not winning one more

Daniels v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Ask yourself: If you have one year left to live, what would you do? Next

Daniels v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Ask yourself: Have I done anything lately worth remembering? Next

GAO-12-18 Federal Reserve Bank Governance
Every block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it. Mich

Bank heterogeneity and monetary policy transmission
Learn to light a candle in the darkest moments of someone’s life. Be the light that helps others see; i

Central Bank communication and monetary policy
Ask yourself: What's one thing I would like to do less of and why? How can I make that happen? Next

Federal Reserve
Learn to light a candle in the darkest moments of someone’s life. Be the light that helps others see; i

Idea Transcript


4 •













Monetary Policy Percent 8 RESERVE MARKET RATES 7

Percent 6 REAL FEDERAL FUNDS RATE c,d

Effective federal funds rate a

5

6 4 Intended federal funds rate b 5 3 4 2 3 Primary credit rate b

1

2 Discount rate b 0

1 0

–1 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Percent 3.00 IMPLIED YIELDS ON FEDERAL FUNDS FUTURES

1988

1994

1991

1997

2000

2003

Percent, daily 100 IMPLIED PROBABILITIES OF ALTERNATIVE TARGET FEDERAL FUNDS RATES (DECEMBER FOMC MEETING) f 90

2.75 November 19, 2004

2.25% 80

2.50 June 14, 2004

70

October 26, 2004

2.25

Employment report for October 60

2.00 50 2.00%

1.75

September 22, 2004 e

1.50

40

August 11, 2004 e

30

1.25

20

1.00

10

0.75

0 May

July

Sept. 2004

Nov.

Jan.

Mar.

May 2005

July

Sept.

2.50%

1.75% 10/19

10/23

10/27

10/31

11/04 2004

11/08

11/12

11/16

FRB Cleveland • December 2004

a. Weekly average of daily figures. b. Daily observations. c. Defined as the effective federal funds rate deflated by the core PCE Chain Price Index. d. Shaded bars indicate periods of recession. e. One day after the FOMC meeting. f. Probabilities are calculated using trading-day closing prices from options on January 2004 federal funds futures that trade on the Chicago Board of Trade. SOURCES: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “Selected Interest Rates,” Federal Reserve Statistical Releases, H.15; Chicago Board of Trade; and Bloomberg Financial Information Services.

At its November 10 meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised its target for the federal funds rate from 1.75% to 2%—just above the inflation rate for core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) over the past year. A quarter-point hike had been widely anticipated in financial markets. The action was also consistent with the FOMC’s recent pattern of policy announcements and actions. After its May meeting, it adopted statement language noting that

“the Committee believes that policy accommodation can be removed at a measured pace.” At all four meetings since May, the FOMC has chosen to raise the fed funds rate target 25 basis points and to repeat the statement language. Futures and options prices during the weeks before each meeting placed high probabilities on the outcomes ultimately chosen. Thus, quarter-point hikes have been viewed as a measured pace of policy tightening. Two weeks before the FOMC’s November meeting, however, prices

for futures and options revealed a possible break in the recent pattern. Specifically, they implied that policymakers would maintain the measured pattern at their November meeting, but then would probably pause, leaving the target rate unchanged in December. During the summer, incoming data indicated that economic activity was weaker than expected, which suggested that policy was no longer as accommodative. Implied yields began to recede from their (continued on next page)

5 •













Monetary Policy (cont.) Percent, weekly average 6.0 YIELD CURVE b,c

Percent 8 IMPLIED YIELDS ON EURODOLLAR FUTURES

July 2, 2004 d

5.5 7

August 11, 2004 a

5.0 June 18, 2004

6

4.5 July 1, 2004 a

November 23, 2004

5

November 19, 2004

4.0

August 13, 2004 d

3.5 4 3.0

October 26, 2004 3

September 24, 2004 d

2.5 September 22, 2004 a

2

2.0 1.5

1

1.0 0.5

0 2004

2007

2010

0

2013

Percent, weekly average 8 SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATES b

5

10 Years to maturity

15

20

Percent, weekly average 9 LONG-TERM INTEREST RATES

7 8 Conventional mortgage

6 7 5

6

4 One-year Treasury bill

Two-year Treasury note

3 5 2

20-year Treasury bond b 4

Three-month Treasury bill 1

10-year Treasury note b

0 1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

3 1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

FRB Cleveland • December 2004

a. One day after the FOMC meeting. b. All yields are from constant-maturity series. c. Average for the week ending on the date shown. d. First weekly average available after the FOMC meeting. SOURCES: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “Selected Interest Rates,” Federal Reserve Statistical Releases, H.15; and Bloomberg Financial Information Services.

June 14 peaks. In late October, however, data suggested that a pickup might be at hand. A strong employment report on November 5 reinforced the optimistic view, making a December rate hike of 25 basis points unambiguously the most likely outcome. This action would result in a real fed funds rate more clearly in positive territory. Implied yields derived from eurodollar futures provide some measure of expected policy actions over longer horizons. Because these yields include premiums related to a variety

of risks exceeding those faced in the federal funds market, they tend to overpredict the fed funds rate, especially in the out years. Nevertheless, changes over time in the slope of implied yields are largely consistent with changing policy predictions. They reveal a substantial shift in the expected fed funds rate two years and more in the future. Weak incoming data during the summer and early fall suggested not only a policy pause in the near term, but also a less restrictive monetary policy later in the expansion.

The changes in implied yields paralleled changes in the yield curve. Over the second half of 2004, short-term interest rates tended to rise as longterm rates fell. Short-term rates are more closely linked to expected changes in the fed funds rate. The real fed funds rate, which has been near or below zero, could increase and still remain accommodative. Long-term rates, on the other hand, are driven largely by underlying economic fundamentals and inflation expectations.

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.