MSD : SAE Aero Aircraft Design & Build Preliminary Horizontal ... - EDGE [PDF]

NACA-0018, NACA-0021, NACA-0024 Airfoil Comparison: 9. Aspect Ratio : 4. Justification: a) It is recommended that the as

21 downloads 6 Views 795KB Size

Recommend Stories


SAE Aero Design West 2015
The happiest people don't have the best of everything, they just make the best of everything. Anony

AERO pertaining to aircraft
Ask yourself: When was the last time I read a book that had a major influence on me? Next

16309 Aero-Design 2
Don't be satisfied with stories, how things have gone with others. Unfold your own myth. Rumi

2015 Aero Design East
You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks

Aircraft Design
Goodbyes are only for those who love with their eyes. Because for those who love with heart and soul

Edge Design
Silence is the language of God, all else is poor translation. Rumi

Design-Build
What you seek is seeking you. Rumi

Design-Build
Why complain about yesterday, when you can make a better tomorrow by making the most of today? Anon

[PDF] Download Aircraft Engine Design, Second Edition
Goodbyes are only for those who love with their eyes. Because for those who love with heart and soul

Light Aircraft Design Manuals
Nothing in nature is unbeautiful. Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Idea Transcript


MSD : SAE Aero Aircraft Design & Build Preliminary Horizontal and Vertical Stabilizer Design, Longitudinal and Directional Static Stability Horizontal Stabilizer Parameters: 1. Ratio of horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance with respect to fuselage length π‘™π‘Žπ‘ /𝑙𝑓 2. Overall fuselage length 𝑙𝑓 3. Horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance π‘™π‘Žπ‘ 4. Horizontal tail volume coefficient 𝑉𝐻 5. Center of gravity location π‘₯𝑐𝑔 6. Horizontal tail arm 𝑙𝑑 7. Horizontal tail planform area 𝑆𝑑 8. Horizontal tail airfoil 9. Horizontal tail aspect ratio 𝐴𝑅𝑑 10. Horizontal tail taper ratio πœ†π‘‘ 11. Additional geometric parameters (Sweep Angle, Twist Angle, Dihedral) 12. Incidence Angle 𝑖𝑑 13. Neutral Point π‘₯𝑁𝑃 14. Static Margin 15. Overall Horizontal Stabilizer Geometry 16. Overall Aircraft Static Longitudinal Stability 17. Elevator (TBD in Control Surfaces Design) Vertical Stabilizer Parameters: 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.

Vertical tail volume coefficient 𝑉𝑣 Vertical tail arm 𝑙𝑣 Vertical tail planform area 𝑆𝑉 Vertical tail aspect ratio 𝐴𝑅𝑣 Vertical tail span 𝑏𝑣 Vertical tail sweep angle Ξ› 𝑣

24. 25. 26. 27. 28.

Vertical tail minimum lift curve slope 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑣 Vertical tail airfoil Overall Vertical Stabilizer Geometry Overall Aircraft Static Direction Stability Rudder (TBD in Control Surfaces Design)

1. l/Lf Ratio: 0.6 The table below shows statistical ratios between the distance between the wing aerodynamic center and the horizontal tail aerodynamic center π‘™π‘Žπ‘ with respect to the overall fuselage length (Lf).

2. Fuselage Length (Lf): 60.00 in Choosing this value is an iterative process to meet longitudinal and vertical static stability, internal storage, and center of gravity requirements, but preliminarily choose 𝑙𝑓 = 60.00 𝑖𝑛 3. Horizontal tail-wing aerodynamic centers distance 𝒍𝒂𝒄 : 36.00 in π‘™π‘Žπ‘ = 0.6 𝑙𝑓 π‘™π‘Žπ‘ = 36.00 𝑖𝑛 4. Horizontal Tail Volume Coefficient (VH): 1.0 The table below shows the horizontal and vertical tail coefficients for various types of aircraft.

𝑉𝐻 =

𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑑 𝑆𝑐

𝑉𝐻 = 1

5. Center of Gravity Location (xcg):𝟎. πŸ‘πŸŽπ‘ Justification: a) Choose center of gravity aft of aerodynamic center to aid (give more room) with placing components to meet specified center of gravity location. b) If horizontal tail stabilizes aircraft pitching up, it generates a positive lift force, adding to the wing lift. c) 0.30𝑐 is the aft most recommended limit for center of gravity placement. 6. Horizontal Tail Arm 𝒍𝒕 : 35.2537 in 𝑙𝑑 = π‘™π‘Žπ‘ βˆ’ π‘₯𝑐𝑔 βˆ’ π‘₯π‘Žπ‘ 𝑙𝑑 = 35.2537 𝑖𝑛 7. Horizontal Tail Planform Area (St): 3.6352 𝑓𝑑 2 𝑉𝐻 =

𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑑 =1 𝑆𝑐

𝑆𝑑 = 3.6352 𝑓𝑑 2 8. Airfoil Selection: NACA-0021 Justification: a) Choose symmetric airfoil as the horizontal tail should behave in a similar manner when at a positive or negative angle-of-attack b) Horizontal tail should never stall, specifically it should at least stall later than the wing for recovery c) Maximize 𝐢𝐿 π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ 𝑑 d) Maximize 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 𝑑 e) Minimize overall drag f) Minimize overall size

NACA-0009:

NACA-0010:

NACA-0015:

NACA-0018

NACA-0021:

NACA-0024:

NACA-0018, NACA-0021, NACA-0024 Airfoil Comparison:

9. Aspect Ratio 𝑨𝑹𝒕 : 4 Justification: a) It is recommended that the aspect ratio of the tail be such that the span is longer than the propeller diameter to ensure that a portion of the tail is out of the wake or downwash of the wing, increasing tail efficiency πœ‚ . b) Horizontal tail aspect ratio should be lower than that of the wing to increase stall angle and allow for recovery if needed c) It is recommended that: 2 𝐴𝑅𝑑 = 𝐴𝑅𝑀 3 𝐴𝑅𝑑 = 4 10. Horizontal Tail Taper Ratio 𝝀𝒕 : 0.7 a) For transport aircraft, the horizontal tail taper ratio is usually between 0.4 and 0.7 b) To ensure a higher stall angle than the wing through a lower Oswald efficiency factor and a lift distribution that is less elliptical, choose πœ†π‘‘ = 0.7 11. Additional geometric parameters (Sweep Angle, Twist Angle, Dihedral): N/A a) For the benefits of applying the any of the above parameters to the horizontal geometry, refer to the preliminary wing design parameter selection document b) In the preliminary design phase, it is recommended to make these parameters have the same values as those of the wing.

12. Horizontal Tail Incidence Angle π’Šπ’• : 4.2300 deg -

Determine horizontal tail incidence angle to trim (longitudinal) aircraft at cruise

πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 = πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔

𝑀

+ πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 + πΆπ‘š 𝑐𝑔 = 0 𝑑

𝑓

πΆπ‘š 0 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑀 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑑 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑑 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑓 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓 𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ = 0 πΆπ‘š π‘Žπ‘ 𝑀 + 𝐢𝐿0 𝑀 π‘˜ 2 βˆ’π‘˜ 1 36.5𝑆𝑐

π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓 π‘₯=0

π‘₯ 𝑐𝑔 𝑐

βˆ’

π‘₯ π‘Žπ‘ 𝑐

+ 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀

π‘₯ 𝑐𝑔 𝑐

βˆ’

π‘₯ π‘Žπ‘ 𝑐

𝑀𝑓 2 𝛼0 𝑀 + 𝑖𝑓 Ξ”π‘₯ +

𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ + πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ€0 + 𝑖𝑀 βˆ’ 𝑖𝑑 βˆ’ πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 𝑑

1 36.5𝑆𝑐

𝑖𝑑 = 4.2300 𝑑𝑒𝑔 13. Neutral Point 𝒙𝑡𝑷 :0.7067𝑐 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 π‘₯𝑛𝑝 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘ πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓 π‘‘πœ€ 𝑑 = βˆ’ + πœ‚π‘‰π» 1βˆ’ 𝑐 𝑐 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀 𝑑𝛼 π‘₯𝑁𝑃 = 0.7067𝑐 14. Static Margin: 0.3548 π‘†π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘”π‘–π‘› = π‘₯𝑁𝑃 βˆ’ π‘₯𝑐𝑔 π‘†π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘”π‘–π‘› = 0.3548

π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓 π‘₯=0

𝑀𝑓 2

πœ•πœ€ 𝑒 πœ•π›Ό

Ξ”π‘₯

𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ = 0

𝑑

1βˆ’

π‘‘πœ€ 𝑑𝛼

𝛼𝑀 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘–π‘ π‘’ +

15. Horizontal Stabilizer Geometry

16. Overall Aircraft Longitudinal Stability Criteria for Longitudinal Static Stability πΆπ‘š 𝛼 =

π‘‘πΆπ‘š 0 πΆπ‘š 0 = πΆπ‘š 0 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 0 𝑑 +πΆπ‘š 0 𝑓

πΆπ‘š 0 = πΆπ‘š π‘Žπ‘ 𝑀 + 𝐢𝐿0 𝑀

π‘₯𝑐𝑔 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘ π‘˜2 βˆ’ π‘˜1 βˆ’ + πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ€0 + 𝑖𝑀 βˆ’ 𝑖𝑑 + 𝑑 𝑐 𝑐 36.5𝑆𝑐

π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓

𝑀𝑓 2 𝛼0 𝑀 + 𝑖𝑓 Ξ”π‘₯ π‘₯=0

πΆπ‘š 𝛼 = πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑀 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑑 + πΆπ‘š 𝛼 𝑓

πΆπ‘š 𝛼 = 𝐢𝐿𝛼 𝑀

π‘₯𝑐𝑔 π‘₯π‘Žπ‘ π‘‘πœ€ 1 βˆ’ βˆ’ πœ‚π‘‰π» 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 1 βˆ’ + 𝑑 𝑐 𝑐 𝑑𝛼 36.5𝑆𝑐 π‘ͺπ’Ž 𝜢 𝟏/𝒓𝒂𝒅 π‘ͺπ’Ž 𝟎

π‘₯=𝑙 𝑓

𝑀𝑓 2 π‘₯=0

πœ•πœ€π‘’ Ξ”π‘₯ πœ•π›Ό

-1.4679 0.1281

18. Vertical tail volume coefficient 𝑽𝒗 : 0.06 The following table shows the vertical tail characteristics for various aircraft. Because our aircraft configuration and mission requirements are very similar to the C-130, many vertical tail parameters are chosen so that they match those of that aircraft.

𝑉𝑣 =

𝑙𝑣 𝑆𝑣 𝑆𝑏

𝑉𝑣 = 0.06 19. Vertical tail arm 𝒍𝒗 : 36.1102 in During the preliminary design phase, the vertical tail arm is selected to be equal to the horizontal tail arm, then adjusted after further iterations if needed. 𝑙𝑣 = 36.1102 𝑖𝑛 20. Vertical tail planform area 𝑺𝑽 : 1.1521 𝑓𝑑 2 𝑉𝑣 =

𝑙𝑣 𝑆𝑣 = 0.08 𝑆𝑏

𝑆𝑣 = 1.1521 𝑓𝑑 2

21. Vertical tail aspect ratio 𝑨𝑹𝒗 : 1.84 Choose vertical tail aspect ratio such that it matches that of the C-130 (Table 6.6). 𝑨𝑹𝒗 = 𝟏. πŸ–πŸ’ 22. Vertical tail span 𝒃𝒗 : 17.4716 in 𝐴𝑅𝑣 =

𝑏𝑣 2 𝑆𝑣

𝑏𝑣 = 17.4716 𝑖𝑛 23. Vertical tail sweep angle πš²π’— : 18.8 deg Choose vertical tail sweep angle such that it matches that of the C-130 (Table 6.6). Ξ› 𝑣 = 18.8 𝑑𝑒𝑔 24. Vertical tail minimum lift curve slope π‘ͺπ‘³πœΆ 𝒗 : 0.0011137 [1/deg] -

Determine minimum vertical tail lift curve slope so to meet the static directional stability requirement 𝐢𝑛 𝛽 > 0

𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = 𝐢𝑛 𝛽

𝑀𝑓

+ 𝐢𝑛 𝛽

𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = βˆ’π‘˜π‘› π‘˜π‘…π‘™ 𝐢𝐿 𝛼

𝑣 π‘šπ‘–π‘›

𝑣

𝑆𝑓𝑠 𝑙𝑓 π‘‘πœŽ + 𝑉𝑣 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ‚π‘£ 1 βˆ’ 𝑣 𝑆𝑏 𝑑𝛽

= 0.0011137 1/𝑑𝑒𝑔

25. Vertical Tail Airfoil: NACA-0009 a) Choose symmetric airfoil as the vertical tail should behave in a similar manner when at a positive or negative angle-of-attack b) To minimize structure and weight, choose airfoil with smallest thickness that meets 𝐢𝐿 𝛼

𝑣 π‘šπ‘–π‘›

c) Refer to symmetric airfoil plots when choosing the horizontal tail airfoil

𝐢𝑙 𝛼 =

Δ𝐢𝐿 𝑣 Δ𝛼

NACA-0009 (As Stabilizer not Airfoil, from XFLR5) 𝛼 (deg) 𝐢𝐿 𝑣 0 0 5.00 0.314

𝐢𝐿 𝛼 = 0.1214 [1/deg] 𝑣

26. Vertical Stabilizer Geometry

27. Overall Aircraft Directional Stability Criterion for Directional Static Stability 𝐢𝑛 𝛽 =

𝑑𝐢𝑛 >0 𝑑𝛽

𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = 𝐢𝑛 𝛽

𝑀𝑓

+ 𝐢𝑛 𝛽

𝐢𝑛 𝛽 = βˆ’π‘˜π‘› π‘˜π‘…π‘™

𝑣

𝑆𝑓𝑠 𝑙𝑓 π‘‘πœŽ + 𝑉𝑣 𝐢𝐿 𝛼 πœ‚π‘£ 1 βˆ’ 𝑣 𝑆𝑏 𝑑𝛽 π‘ͺ𝒏 𝜷 𝟏/𝒓𝒂𝒅

0.2847

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

Β© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.