Idea Transcript
Archive | November, 2012
OV
What’s the Deal with MSS Spectrum? Frank Rayal (https://frankrayal.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/whats-the-deal-with-mss-spectrum/) (http://frankrayal.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/mobile-satellite-services-4.png)Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) spectrum is bustling with activity. With so many failed satellite service companies, it is no surprise that spectrum earmarked for such services be converted, or allowed to co-exist with profitable mobile services. Here, I like to summarize some of the developments surrounding MSS spectrum. View original post (https://frankrayal.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/whats-the-deal-with-mss-spectrum/) 542 more words
Report this ad
Report this ad Tags: Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/mobile-satellite-services-mss/), Spectrum (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/spectrum/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES Satellite
What’s this 4G all about? Pradeep's Mobile Blog (https://ppvshenoy.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/whats-all-about-this-4g/) I am pretty sure you’ve seen TV and newspaper ads for 4G mobile service from your mobile service provider or come across casual hall-way conversations about latest 4G phones. So, what is this 4G all about? Simply put, 4G refers to Fourth Generation mobile wireless technology. In layman terms, this provides more data bandwidth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_%28computing%29) by using technologies that enable efficient use of available wireless spectrum, enhanced modulation techniques and antenna design. There’s lots more to discuss about this technology compared to its predecessors (2G, 3G), but for 99% of end-users, its all about high bandwidth (how does 100Mb/s sound?!) which in-turn supports multitude of bandwidth-hungry applications like mobile HDTV, for instance. I am sure you’ll agree that for most users it is the sexiness of the phone that comes first followed by throughput, applications and cell coverage. Technology behind all this is of least concern. This is akin to most… View original post (https://ppvshenoy.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/whats-all-about-this-4g/) 551 more words COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES 4G
Cisco helps Eastlink harness cloud, gives customers anywhere access with Videoscape Cisco Canada Blog (https://ciscocanada.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/cisco-helps-eastlink-harness-cloud-gives-customers-anywhere-access-with-videoscape/) With devices like smartphones and tablets it has never been easier to take our favourite music, applications and videos on the go. Mobility, powerful new devices and even social media are changing the way we consume content. As consumers we might not stop to think about the technology ‘behind the cover’ that makes this possible, but at Cisco that’s our job. We’re always thinking of innovative ways to help service providers deliver their content. The appetite for anywhere, anytime consumption is forcing service providers to change their digital delivery offerings quickly, a trend being helped by a shift to cloud services that increase access and availability for users. How ubiquitous has cloud become? We recently released the second annual Global Cloud Index Forecast (http://bit.ly/TvvBaM), and the predictions were staggering. The Forecast showed global cloud traffic will grow from 683 exabytes of annual traffic in 2011 to 4.3 zettabytes by 2016… View original post (https://ciscocanada.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/cisco-helps-eastlink-harness-cloud-gives-customers-anywhere-access-with-videoscape/) 298 more words Tags: Video (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/video/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES Cloud
Mobile LTE subscribers expected to double by 2014 BGR (https://bgr.com/2012/11/29/lte-subscribers-double-2014/) High-speed 4G LTE networks are the future of mobile data in the United States and around the world. A number of major wireless providers have already deployed LTE networks (http://bgr.com/2012/11/08/verizon-4g-lte-coverage-complete-mid-2013/) and others are expected to follow soon (http://bgr.com/2012/11/21/dish-network-lte-plan-fcc/). The Yankee Group found that by the end of 2012 there will be 152 commercial LTE networks across 65 countries, an increase from 47 networks in 2011. The research firm predicts that in 2013 there will be roughly 114 million mobile subscribers utilizing the high-speed technology, a number that is expected to more than double to 258 million by the end of 2014. The global voice and messaging revenue mobile operators are expected to make is also predicted to fall from $769 billion in 2011 to $697 billion in 2016. As a result, Yankee expects service providers to bundle additional content apps and services with LTE subscriptions, as well as increasing their cloud-based storage… View original post (https://bgr.com/2012/11/29/lte-subscribers-double-2014/) 403 more words COMMENTS 1 Comment CATEGORIES LTE, Subscribers
Understanding Wireless QoS – Part 1 After reading few online posts about wireless QoS, I felt it is worth to spend some time to understand what’s going on packet level. So this will be the first part of wireless QoS related posts. I have used following lab set up for this exercise.
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-1.png) In this part, I will look at how QoS parameter (primarily DSCP/COS tag) of a packet change when it traverse from wireless client (C7921) to Wired client (PC). Before looking into the packet capture this is my basic understanding how it should work. 1. If wireless client device is WMM capable it will classify its application traffic into one of four categories (Voice-VO, Video-VI, Best Effort-BE, Background-BK).In this case RTP media traffic with DSCP EF (WMM AC – VO) & tcp control traffic with DSCP CS3 (WMM AC-BE). 2. When AP receive this traffic, it will encapsulates the original packet into CAPWAP and added outer DSCP values(copy the inner DSCP value as long as QoS profile allow that level of QoS). 3. CAPWAP packet source would be Access Point IP & destination IP would be WLC ap-manager IP(In 5508 just mgt IP as no ap-manager interface).Source port would be high random UDP port & destination would be UDP 5247(capwap-data) 4. This outer DSCP value corresponds to original packet DSCP & capped into a max value as per the QoS profile(Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze) defined on the WLC. 5. If Switchport connected to AP is configured to trust DSCP it will trust this outer DSCP 6. If packet is sent to a trunk port it will derive a COS value based on the outer DSCP. 7. When It comes to WLC & prior to send packet to wired side,it will re-write COS value based on the capped value configure on QoS profile outer DSCP value un-changed. 8. If switchport connected WLC is configured to trust cos, it will trust cos & derive DSCP value based on cos-dscp table mapping on the switch. 9. Then packet will send to the wired client. First Capture I have taken at the switch port (Fa1/0/13) where AP connected while VoIP call originated from 7921 Phone(10.10.15.53) to the soft-phone in wired PC(192.168.1.10).
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-2.png) If you look at from bottom to top, you will see original packet is destined to PC IP (192.168.1.10) with RTP payload (udp range 16384-32767). This is marked with DSCP EF by the wireless phone. Through the wireless media this get priority as this will classified as WMM-VO category & contention window for those packets are smaller than the other wireless packets. When it comes to Access Point, AP encapsulates this packet in to CAPWAP (des port 5247) & sending it to WLC ap-mgr IP. AP should map outer DSCP to EF(as my QoS profile for the WLAN in this exercise is set to Platinum). But why I am seeing outer DSCP 0 in the above packet capture. This is because switch port will not trust DSCP/CoS of a incoming packet by default. It will rewrite DSCP 0 instead. If you configure “mls qos trust DSCP” on fa1/0/13, you would see the packet capture like this. Note that now Outer DSCP value is preserved as EF.
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-3.png) Now if you capture the packets at WLC connected switch port you would see two packets corresponds to this conversation(7921->PC). One with CAPWAP encapsulation (from AP to WLC) & other with normal packet towards wired PC. In the CAPWAP packets parameters as same as fa1/0/13 capture (unless switch use dscp mutation map). Packet towards PC should have the original DSCP set up.But if you look at outgoing packet at Fa1/0/4 (towards CME & Wired PC), you will see the DSCP as 0.
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-4.png) This is again due to switch port is not trusting DSCP/CoS values by default. You have to configure “mls qos trust DSCP|CoS” on the interface connected to WLC to preserve the original DSCP value of the packet. Cisco’s best practice is to trust the CoS value as switch port is configured as Layer 2-Trunk. Then switch will trust this CoS value of the incoming packet from Controller & re-write DSCP correspond to this CoS value prior to send it to wired infrastructure. Below shows the capture at Fa1/0/4 when WLC connected switch port configured for “mls
qos trust cos“
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-5.png)
Still here you can configure “mls qos trust dscp” & preserve the QoS values end to end. In this way switch will not re-write DSCP based on the incoming CoS value. Trusting DSCP is my preferred option as I want classifying my network traffic & assign a DSCP label at the access layer ingress port.(Do Not Want switch to change this value based on dscp-cos-dscp mapping occur in transit) Following diagram summarized these QoS parameter mapping at the AP & WLC in a unified wireless deployment model (CAPWAP). We looked at Step 4 & 5 in this post.
(http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/capwap-qos4.png) Since my WLAN QoS profile is set to Platinum outer DSCP value was remain as EF. But if my QoS profile was Gold, then what would be the outer DSCP when it goes from AP ? It won’t be EF as QoS profile Gold does not allow that (max is AF41 ).So outer DSCP capped to AF41 (even though inner DSCP is EF). Below table show the WMM user priority values &
corresponding DSCP mapping values in each QoS profile. (http://mrncciew.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wireless-qos-6.png) In the next post will see how the return traffic (PC -> C7921) QoS value get change at the transit points.(Fa1/0/4, G1/0/1, WLC, Fa1/0/13 & AP ) Source: http://mrncciew.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/understanding-wireless-qos-part-1/ (http://mrncciew.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/understanding-wireless-qos-part-1/) Tags: CAPWAP DSCP mapping (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/capwap-dscp-mapping/), Wireless QoS (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/wireless-qos/), WMM (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/wmm/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES QoS
BGP IPv6 Bits and Beans (https://bitsandbeans.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/bgp-ipv6/) Topology
(http://bitsandbeans.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/screen-shot-2012-11-26-at-1-26-10-pm.png) OSPF and OSPFv3 between R1 and R3 OSPF and OSPFv3 between R2 and R4 EBGP between R1 (AS1300) and R2 (AS2400) peering with IPv6 global addresses IGP and addressing configuration R1 ipv6 unicast-routing int lo0 ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ipv6 add 2001:1::1/64 ipv6 ospf 1 area… ! int fa1/0 ip add 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 ipv6 add fe80::1 link ipv6 add 2001:13::1/64 ipv6 ospf 1 area… no shut ! int fa1/1 ip add 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 ipv6 add fe80::1 link ipv6 add 2001:12::1/64 no shut ! router ospf 1 router-id 1.1.1.1 log-adjacency-changes net 10.1.3.0 0.0.0.255 area… net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area… ! ipv6 router ospf 1 router-id 1.1.1.1 log-adjacency-changes R2 ipv6 unicast-routing int lo0 ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ipv6 add 2001:2::2/64 ipv6 ospf 1 area… ! int fa1/0 ip add 10.2.4.2 255.255.255.0 ipv6 add fe80::2 link ipv6 add 2001:24::2/64 ipv6 ospf 1 area… no shut ! int fa1/1 ip add 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0 ipv6… View original post (https://bitsandbeans.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/bgp-ipv6/) 383 more words COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES IPv6
Virtual PBX Improves a Company in 5 Hassle-free Techniques Business VOIP 101 (https://businessvoip101.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/virtual-pbx-improves-a-company-in-5-hassle-free-techniques/) For the longest time, Virtual PBX (Private Branch Exchange) was unattainable for small business owners. Nonetheless, before, about A decade, consumer-grade methods had become available. Right now, small- and medium-size organizations can certainly take on cloud-based telephony. It has been confirmed to help make jobs faster and easier and workplaces streamlined. Hosted business telephone systems made most small companies appear much more specialized and big scale. Your enterprise can also go through the transition. Right here are Five ways a business voip system (http://www.ringcentral.com/business-voip/index.html (http://www.ringcentral.com/business-voip/index.html)) assists you to build-up a business: 1. It will help you remain connected. This enterprise telephone system permits you to stay connected to your business where ever you may be. You could add in home- or office-based telephones and also mobile phone devices. 2. It will increase your client base. A hosted telephone system will permit add-ons like a toll free number. Incorporating an… View original post (https://businessvoip101.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/virtual-pbx-improves-a-company-in-5-hassle-free-techniques/) 435 more words COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES PBX
Voice calls over 4G LTE networks are battery killers Gigaom (https://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/) Every mobile carrier wants to replace their old voice services with new VoIP-based systems utilizing their 4G networks, but it looks like they’ve got some big kinks to iron out in the technology first. Wireless testing and measurement vendor Spirent Communications has identified a big problem with voice over LTE (VoLTE): it consumes twice as much power as a traditional 2G call, which could have big implications for mobile phone battery life. Metrico Wireless, a radio field testing company Spirent acquired in September (http://www.spirent.com/About-Us/News_Room/Press-Releases/2012/2012_09_06_News_Announcement), conducted voice trials on a commercial VoLTE-enabled network in two U.S. cities, comparing the power consumption of VoIP calls made over LTE against the power used by the same carrier’s CDMA systems. Spirent-Metrico didn’t name the carrier, but it’s not hard to guess. MetroPCS(s pcs) is the only U.S. operator with a live VoLTE service (http://gigaom.com/mobile/metropcs-enters-the-voip-age-who-will-be-next/) and a commercially available handset. The 1540 milliamp hour (mAh)-battery on Metro’s… View original post (https://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/) 565 more words Tags: Battery killers (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/battery-killers/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES 4G, VoIP
OTT and IPTV Integration Increasingly Popular How do you plan to spend your evening most times when you order a pizza? You’re very likely to watch a video. In the UK, Domino’s Pizza Group saw the value of over-the-top (OTT) online video to boost customer loyalty, and back in October launched the Domino’s Pizza Box Office video streaming offer. Customers order a pizza and get a download code to stream a movie at home. This is just another example of how OTT is revolutionizing the way video content is delivered to consumers: Today almost anyone can become a content provider. Exhibit: Evolving video delivery environment and video platforms
Source: Pyramid Research Many operators see the proliferation of OTT as a threat to their established IPTV business models. They fear that OTT will subvert their role in the pay-TV value chain and cannibalize revenue. We’ve found, however, that the opposite is just as likely to be true. In our new report, “OTT Growth Sparks Innovation Multiscreen Video Business Models,” we argue that OTT is serving as an innovation stimulus for the pay-TV market, pushing telcos to enhance their IPTV services with more screens. We also find that an increasing number of operators, alongside their managed IPTV services, are directly entering into non-managed OTT environments. This means that more operators are using the open Internet to offer video services to potentially any consumer with a broadband connectivity, being their existing customers or not. OTT in emerging markets: Challenges and opportunities Operators are warming up to the idea of launching their own OTT services, especially in emerging markets. While IPTV remains a premium service, which requires subscribers to purchase more expensive bundles, OTT is more flexible and only requires a good broadband connection. This means that in the more price-sensitive markets, where there is still strong demand for online video, OTT is becoming an attractive option for users. Besides, OTT services are typically delivered over a wide range of screens and at different price points, including smartphones, tablets and gaming consoles, making them more accessible to different consumer profiles. In Colombia, for example, ETB has announced that it will shortly launch an OTT service to complement its upcoming IPTV deployment. In Mexico, the OTT service provided by fiber-tothe-home (FTTH) operator Totalplay, dubbed Totalmovie, has rapidly has become the main competitor to Netflix. It offers video content in Mexico alongside the operators’ IPTV platform and across Latin America by using third-party operator infrastructure. As of October, it had 1.9m registered users and 5m unique monthly visitors. We expect to see more Latin American operators launching OTT services. The second largest regional group, Telefonica, is considering positioning OTT commercial offers in several countries. The decision between managed (IPTV) or unmanaged video delivery (OTT) ultimately depends on each country’s infrastructure, competitive environment and operator position. Telefonica has, however, confirmed that there are already ongoing OTT initiatives outside Spain. In Turkey, TTNET, the ISP of fixed-line incumbent Turk Telekom, has already been quite successful in combining its IPTV and OTT offerings. TTNET wants to add value to the bundles, which in turns helps increase customer loyalty and reduce churn. This is crucial in preventing the decline of Turk Telekom’s fixed-line base. While IPTV is positioned as a premium service, OTT is priced very competitively. As of August this year, TTNET had over 1.2m OTT and 150,000 IPTV subscriptions. OTT can provide significant benefits to operators. In the case of TTNET, positioning OTT alongside IPTV is encouraging consumers to break through their broadband allowances, thus creating the need to migrate to higher-value packages. In the case of Totalplay in Mexico, OTT is contributing to the monetization of the operator’s superfast fiber-based network. For both operators, using third-party infrastructure breaks the link between content delivery and network management. The outlook is positive In the near future, we expect to see significant revenue-generating opportunities associated with VoD, catch-up TV, and targeted advertising, especially when telcos can integrate their OTT and IPTV offerings with interactive and social media functions.
Using the open Internet for content delivery, however, has its downsides. The main shortcoming with OTT is that the operator is not in control of quality of service (QoS). Especially in emerging markets, quality of service and network speeds vary wildly from country to country, making it challenging to ensure the same quality of experience (QoE) that can be guaranteed through a managed IPTV network. Another challenge for operators is securing in-demand content for OTT platforms. Without doubt content is king, but content is also costly. Unless they are backed by multimedia and broadcasting groups, operators tend to be the weak link in the content production and delivery value chain. But that is a challenge with IPTV too.
All in all, if telcos are serious about developing a pay-TV offering that can resonate with the demand for multiple viewing platforms at different price levels, they need to seriously consider the opportunity of complementing IPTV platforms with OTT. Source: http://www.pyramidresearch.com/points/item/121127.htm Tags: catch-up TV (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/catch-up-tv/), IPTV (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/iptv/), IPTV services (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/iptv-services/), Targeted advertising (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/targeted-advertising/), Video streaming (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/video-streaming/), VoD (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/vod/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES OTT, QoE, QoS
Why and when an organization should consider IPv6
Here we make an attempt to demystify IPv6 transition including its advantages over IPv4 and why organizations should consider deploying it BANGALORE, INDIA: The Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) is the first standardized version of the internet protocol. Introduced almost three decades ago though, it is still relevant and is the dominant network protocol in use today. The re-combination of digits in its 32-bit addressing system provides for 4.3 billion addresses which were assumed to be sufficient for the growth of Internet. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) was given the responsibility of allocating these addresses and it did so by distributing a subset of these to the regional Internet Registries in blocks of approximately 16.8 million addresses each. Also, in April 2011, the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry (APNIC RIR) entered the last stages of IPv4 allocation, making it much difficult for organizations in that region of the world to obtain the IPv4 address space that they would justify for under previous policies. The remaining regions will follow in the near future. Although IPv4 has served its purpose well so far, it did not anticipate and provide for the exponential growth of the Internet, the network security threats and the encryption needs. Limitations of Ipv4: The ubiquity of Internet and the increasing number of servers, workstations and devices are rapidly leading to a scarcity of available public IPv4 addresses. The value of IPv4 addresses is well illustrated by the fact that Microsoft bought 666,624 IP addresses from Nortel for USD 7.5 million in 2011. With several other constraints such as lack of in-built network security and limited Quality of Service (QoS), the stage is set. Why an enterprise should consider Ipv6: By 2015, there will be more than 7.1 billion mobile connected devices globally. Smartphones, home and industrial appliances, Internet connected transportation, integrated telephony, sensor networks, distributed computing, gaming, online business and all other spheres are being driven by the Internet increasingly. The phenomenal growth in the number of objects connecting to the network and the interactions between them brings an increased focus on the rate of depletion of IPv4 addresses, network security and QoS making the transition to IPv6 inevitable. Not adopting IPv6 will not only limit the growth of Internet but also the business potential of enterprises. As more and more users start adopting IPv6only devices, enterprises with IPv4 websites will lose out on business opportunities if they do not provide for this shift. Realizing the urgency, governments across the world are mandating a transition to IPv6. The US government has mandated its federal agencies to ensure that all 10000 of its websites support IPv6 by September 2012 and internal applications that communicate with public Internet servers migrate to IPv6 by 2014. In India, the Telecommunication Engineering Center under the Department of Telecommunications has been given the mandate to facilitate a smooth transition from IPv4 to IPv6. Benefits galore: IPv6 offers various advantages over its predecessor. The expanded addressing capacity of IPv6 will provide about 340 trillion unique addresses in contrast to the addressing capability of IPv4 which is limited to 4 billion. The inexhaustibility of the number of IPv6 addresses can be inferred from the quote by Steven Leibson – ‘we could assign an IPv6 address to EVERY ATOM ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH, and still have enough addresses left to do another 100+ earths.”(http://blog.asmallorange.com/ipv6/ (http://blog.asmallorange.com/ipv6/)) IPv6 will eliminate the need for Network Address Translation (NAT) devices and thereby the capital and operating costs associated with its deployment and maintenance. The IP Security protocol suite has been built into the IPv6 architecture thereby making way for an intrinsic security mechanism with IPv6 implementation. Identical security mechanisms in all applications within an enterprise simplify security management. A more secure network protocol additionally paves the way for deployment of applications that require secure transactions. The extensible structure of the IPv6 header allows provisioning for new features. IPv6 gives better QoS than IPv4 as the IPv6 header contains a field which allows packets that start from a particular host and head to a particular destination, to be identified and handled quickly and efficiently by the routers. IPv6 adoption will benefit various sectors, namely, government, defense, telecommunications, power, transportation and logistics, gaming, real estate, health care and education. Planning your IPv6 migration: While it is evident that IPv6 and IPv4 will continue to coexist for many years now, the true potential of the digital economy and next generation services can only be realized once operators plan their IPv6 migrations. In addition, IPv6 transition is a tedious task given the complexities related with the migration and as IPv6 is not backward compatible companies need to be cautious while planning their migrations to ensure business. It is extremely important that all software and hardware aspects are clearly evaluated before launching a migration, as any gaps can have direct impact on the availability of many critical services. Preparation should be such that design and build doesn’t become prohibitively expensive and Design, Build and Migration should be achieved with minimal impact For this, a company should have vast experience in building and managing complex IP networks on a global scale. It is therefore that it will be well positioned to provide IPv6 transition services to enterprises, service providers, and manufacturers of all sizes and in any part of the world. Pointers below highlight required competencies that address the key complications of any IPv6 migration. Phase 1: Assessment Network Devices, Lab Setup, DNS & DHCP Migration, Application and OS Testing for Ipv6, Enabling IPv6 Device & Network Security, 6PE: IXP Connectivity and Peering, Enabling IPv6 Enterprise requirement, Enterprise VPN Services Plan, and Enterprise VPN Services Implementation Phase 2: Network Topology Assessment, IPv6 Addressing Plan, Smart Phone & Mobile Device testing, NAT 44 Migration for 3G, DSL Broadband Migration Network Security Plan using LSN 444, 6RD, DSLITE & Dual Stack, and DSL Broadband Migration. Phase 3: Identify areas that IPv6 has not been covered from access networks point of view, Example: Migrating pseudo wires using IPv4 based targeted LDP sessions, Implement solutions to address areas not covered in Phase I, II and III Phase 4: Turn off IPv4
Conclusion: The pace of growth of connected devices and Internet makes the transition to IPv6 for communication service providers and enterprises inevitable. It is also clear that IPv4 and IPv6 will coexist in the immediate future making things be more difficult to manage and further delaying IPv6 migration. However, the bigger challenge for service providers and large enterprises will be to draw an appropriate roadmap for IPv6 migration, keeping in mind their business continuity needs and strategic goals. The large scale adoption of IPv6 will not only make the Internet more efficient and secure, it will also act as an enabler for a truly digital world, opening new revenue sources and facilitating new revenue models. Source: http://www.ciol.com/ciol/news/122459/why-organization-consider-ipv6 Tags: Ipv4 (https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/tag/ipv4/) COMMENTS Leave a Comment CATEGORIES IPv6 Older posts BLOG AT WORDPRESS.COM.