Nurse Sensitive Outcomes in Ambulatory ... - Prostate Cancer UK [PDF]

Nov 16, 2006 - Patient Important Outcomes ... Feasible. Problematic. Specification / definition of the outcome. Clear ..

0 downloads 9 Views 3MB Size

Recommend Stories


Nurse Practitioner-Sensitive Outcomes
The happiest people don't have the best of everything, they just make the best of everything. Anony

Signaling in Prostate Cancer
Silence is the language of God, all else is poor translation. Rumi

in Prostate cancer
Never wish them pain. That's not who you are. If they caused you pain, they must have pain inside. Wish

(uPAR) in prostate cancer
When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know. But if you listen, you may learn something

NYK in Prostate Cancer
Just as there is no loss of basic energy in the universe, so no thought or action is without its effects,

Exosomes in Prostate Cancer
If you want to become full, let yourself be empty. Lao Tzu

CT in prostate cancer
Make yourself a priority once in a while. It's not selfish. It's necessary. Anonymous

prostate cancer
You can never cross the ocean unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore. Andrè Gide

prostate cancer
We must be willing to let go of the life we have planned, so as to have the life that is waiting for

Prostate Cancer
This being human is a guest house. Every morning is a new arrival. A joy, a depression, a meanness,

Idea Transcript


Demonstrating the contribution of specialist nurses to cancer care Jo Armes

What matters to patients and nurses?

2

The Independent. Thursday, 16 November 2006.

Is caring a lost art in nursing? BBC News 2007

International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008;42(2):163 Channel 4 Dispatches

BBC News 2008

What matters to patients Patient Important Outcomes

Mortality

Survival Disease-specific Hospital Peri-operative

‘Live longer’

Morbidity

Illness Injuries Hospitalisation Incapacitation

Carer-reported

Patient-reported outcomes

Care-giver/family burden

Fatigue Pain Emotional well-being Work status

‘Feel better’ Haywood 2008

4

What matters to nurses

Effective, Humane

Holistic Patientcentred Evidence based Nursing

Safe Prompt

Seamless team Support Advocacy Maben & Griffiths 2008

What matters to cancer nurses

NCAT 2010 6

The policy context of care

7

High Quality Care for All (2008)

8

Nursing Roadmap for Quality (2010) 1. Clarity

2. Measurement 3. Publish performance

4. Recognise & reward 5. Leadership

6. Safeguard 7. Stay ahead

9

Equity & Excellence: NHS Outcomes Framework(2011) 1. Prevention 2. Quality of life 3. Recovery 4. Experience 5. Safety

10

Number of registered nurses 2002-2012 360

350

340

330

320

310

300 2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Source: NHS Information Centre 11

Measuring high quality nursing care

12

Why measure quality? • “Good teams measure what they do” • Understanding • how does the system work • how can it be improved

• Performance management • monitoring how a system is performing against internal / external standards

• Accountability • criteria against which we can be held to account by line managers, government and the public

13

Process or outcomes?

14

What do breast CNS do?

15

Cancer experience survey (2010)

16

Most frequently identified indicators Outcomes Objective

Subjective

Mortality Pressure sore Failure to rescue Falls Healthcare Acquired Infections (pneumonia, surgical wound, urinary tract) Medication administration errors

Satisfaction Patient/family complaints Patient reported communication / dignity / respect Activities of daily living & self care

Process / Structure Use of restraints Smoking cessation counselling Staffing level Skill mix Sickness rates Bank and agency usage Practice environment / perceived quality Voluntary turnover Staff knowledge and expertise

Perception of adequate staffing Staff satisfaction & wellbeing Sickness rates

What makes a good outcome indicator? •Important •Scientifically sound •Useable •Feasible

18

Importance

Scientific basis

Useability

Feasability

Mortality

Pressure sores

Impact

High

Medium

Variation in quality

High

Unsure

Evidence of sensitivity to nursing

Strong

Weak

Risk adjustment

Feasible

Problematic

Specification / definition of the outcome

Clear

Problematic

Reliability of data collection

Good

Problematic

Variation attributable to nursing

Low

Unclear

Ownership by nursing

Unclear

High

Knowledge to inform action

Unclear

Clear

Wide applicability

Yes

Yes

Positive behavioural incentives

High

Mixed

Potential for gaming

Low

High

Timely availability of data

Potentially

Challenging

Routinely collected data

Yes

No

‘Nursing-sensitive outcomes are those outcomes arrived at, or significantly impacted by, nursing interventions…’ ‘They represent the consequences or effects of nursing interventions and result in changes in patients’ symptom experience, functional status, safety, psychological distress and/or costs’ ONS Outcomes Project Team July 2004 20

www.ons.org/outcomes/measures/outcomes.shtml

Nurse sensitive outcomes in ambulatory chemotherapy

21

NCAT: Quality in Cancer Nursing Phase 1 Develop set of outcome based metrics for care quality Identify a set of nurse sensitive patient outcomes for ambulatory chemotherapy settings

22

Methods • Series of scoping reviews to identify nurse sensitive outcomes • Shortlist developed – ranked & verified by experts • Secondary search on shortlist • Grading system used to determine strength of evidence • Results presented to experts to identify outcomes recognised as • Most useful quality measures • Most important for patients

23

Most Useful Measure of Quality? (rank of scores)

Most Important to Patients? (rank of scores)

(Rank in literature)

Recommendation/ evidence

Assessment of sensitivity to nursing

Safe Medication Administration

1

3

(2)

1C

Probable

Septicaemia

2

7

(10)

2C

Possible

Education and Communication

4

2

(4)

1B*

Probable

Experience

3

1

(8)

-

Likely

Wellbeing and Function

5

6

(1)

1B/C

Possible

Nausea and Vomiting

6

4

(9)

1A/B

Likely

Pain

7

5

(3)

1A/B

Possible

Diarrhoea

8

9

(5)

1A/B

Possible

Fatigue

9

8

(6)

B/C

Possible

Oral Mucositis

10

10

(7)

1ABC

Probable

Nutrition

11

11

(11)

B/C

Possible

Outcome

Process of development and testing

Stage 1

• Developed patient reported outcome measure

Stage 2

• Pilot at one unit - 1 week Autumn 2010

Stage 3

• Revise and pilot in 10 chemotherapy units • 12 weeks Dec 2010 - Feb 2011

Nature of outcome data • Primarily patient-self report • Patients attending for chemotherapy asked to complete thinking about last time they visited • N=2,466 • Patient characteristics, treatment regimen and cycle

Vomiting Since your last treatment have you experienced vomiting? (n = 2388) Total Centre J Centre K Centre L Centre M

None Mild

Centre N

Moderate Centre P

Severe

Centre Q Centre R Centre S Centre T

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Use of indicators • Indicators, though essential in every improvement process will not by themselves motivate people to change • Good communication bridges the gap between measurement, understanding and improvement • In order to influence people, indicators need to be presented in ways that are easy to understand and in ways that make changes to the system compelling AND possible The Good Indicators Guide (2008) http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=44584 28

29

Nursing Standard (2011) 25 (31) 62-66

http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Aboutus/Healthandsocialcareprofessionals/Newsa ndupdates/MacVoice/DemonstratingthevalueofMacmillanCNSs.aspx 30

Demonstrating nursing’s contribution • Valid and reliable outcomes measures for decision making • Persuasive evidence about the impact of nursing interventions • Presenting evidence to decision makers with easily understandable but compelling information

31

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.