Reducing the stress of drug administration: implications for the 3Rs [PDF]

Sep 23, 2015 - Studies into the effects of IP administration and repeated experience of the technique suggest the proced

7 downloads 13 Views 11MB Size

Recommend Stories


CLASSROOM PRACTISE OF THE 3Rs METHOD
Ask yourself: What do you fear about leaving a bad job or a bad relationship? Next

The Jordan Food and Drug Administration
Just as there is no loss of basic energy in the universe, so no thought or action is without its effects,

THE UNITED STATES FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION - FDA
At the end of your life, you will never regret not having passed one more test, not winning one more

The Australian Heroin Drought and its Implications for Drug Policy
Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying, "I will

The potential role for mass drug administration in malaria elimination
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right. Isaac Asimov

CHMP working group on the application of the 3Rs in
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world. Anne

the ophthalmic implications of the
The greatest of richness is the richness of the soul. Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)

Implications of the Incarnation
Learn to light a candle in the darkest moments of someone’s life. Be the light that helps others see; i

Implications of the GDPR
Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes, including you. Anne Lamott

Idea Transcript


Article | OPEN

Sarah A. Stuart & Emma S.J. Robinson Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 14288 (2015)

Received: 13 May 2015

doi:10.1038/srep14288

Accepted: 14 August 2015

Download Citation

Published: 23 September 2015

Behavioural methods Neuroscience

Corrigendum: 14 December 2015 Updated online 14 December 2015

(a) two-person restraint method, (b) one-person restraint, (c) scruff, (d) modified method. Also see online supplementary movie.

Results for (a) struggling, (b) vocalization and (c) fecal counts during dosing in LH = Lister hooded, 400–550 g, n = 8 per group, young Wistar, 280-320g, n = 6 per group, Stock Wistar 400-500 g, n = 5 per group, Stud Wistar 550–700 g, n = 5 per group, and Sprague Dawley rats 290–320 g, n = 4 per group, All, n = 24 per group. Data shown as mean ± s.e.m. Plasma analysis of (d) corticosterone and (e) amphetamine for conventional (n = 6) and modified methods (n = 5; insufficient blood was collected from one animal to process). Data shown as mean ± s.e.m. (f) Affective bias induced by intraperitoneal dosing by the conventional versus the modified method as assessed in the ABT. Each data point represents an individual rat. Error bar, s.e.m., n = 15 rats. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Updated online 14 December 2015

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Scientific Reports ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.