Review of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases*

Loading...
ANNALS O F CLIN IC AL AND LABORATORY SC IEN CE, Vol. 29, No. 2 Copyright © 1999, Institute for Clinical Science, Inc.

R eview o f Risk Factors for Cardiovascular D iseases* LILY L. WU, Ph.D. Departments o f Pathology and Internal Medicine, University o f Utah Health Science Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132

ABSTRACT Traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease (C H D ) include only the patient’s age and family history and w hether there is evidence o f hypertension, elevated LDL, low H D L , diabetes or history of smoking. In recent years, considerable progress has b e e n m ad e in id en tify in g a new g e n era tio n o f risk factors, including Lp(a), triglycerides, subfractions of H D L and LDL, modified LDL, apo E pheno/ genotype, homocysteine and fibrinogen. At th e same time, studies have broadened our knowledge of traditional markers. These advances have enabled physicians to make a b etter assessment of patient risk for C H D and to prescribe more appro­ priate treatm ent.

Introduction Coronary heart disease (CH D ) is a multifac­ torial disease. Many risk factors have been identified in the p ast.1,2,3 These are listed in table I. R ecent years have witnessed a signifi­ cant im provem ent in our understanding of these traditional risk factors. Additionally, a new generation o f biochem ical markers for C H D risk has been categorized. These devel­ opm ents have led to b e tte r assessm ent of patient risk and m ore accurate treatm ent for patients. This paper will endeavor to provide up-to-date information relating to traditional and newly-classified biochemical markers. C h olesterol

and

L ip o p r o t e i n s

Hypercholesterolem ia is a well-established risk factor for C H D .4 It has been suggested,

* Send reprint requests to: Lily L. Wu, Ph.D., ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108.

however, that any complete risk assessment of C H D should include other related m easure­ ments: triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (H D L) and the ratio of total cholesterol over H D L , particularly for individuals w ith low total cholesterol.4 Cholesterol and lipoprotein levels recom m ended for adults and children by the National Cholesterol Education Program (N CEP) are shown in tables II and III. L o w - D e n s it y L i p o p r o t e i n ( L D L )

Clinical studies have indicated that individu­ als w ith elev ated low -density lip o p ro te in (LDL) are at greater risk for CHD . M ost myo­ cardial infarctions (MI) occur in patients with 40 to 50 percent stenosis, rather than advanced occlusion. Studies have disclosed the im por­ tance o f stabilizing rupture-prone atheroscle­ rotic plaques. Recent clinical trials have dem ­ o n strated th a t aggressively low ering L D L cholesterol (LDL-C) could stabilize, reduce or even reverse the progression o f atherosclerotic

127 0091-7370/99/0300-0127 $01.75 © Institute for Clinical Science, Inc.

128

w u

Low

TABLE I Major Conventional Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors M ajor Risk Factor Age

Description Male > 45 yr. Female > 55 yr., or postmenopause without estrogen replacement

Family history of ECHD

Ml in male 1° relatives at age >55 Ml in fem ale 1° relatives at age > 65

Hypertension

Blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg or on antihypertensive medication

Low HDL < 35 mg/dl Diabetes mellitus Cigarette smoking High HDL

> 60 mg/dl (subtract one risk factor)

H i g h - D e n s i t y L i p o p r o t e i n ( H D L ) 8 ,9 ,1 0

T he prim e purpose o f high-density lipo­ protein (H D L) is to mobilize cholesterol from th e perip h ery and deliver to the liver for removal from blood circulation by catabolic mechanism. H D L concentration, therefore, is inversely correlated with risk for C H D .11,12 H D L can also protect L D L from oxidation damage. Each 1 percent increase in H D L cho­ lesterol has been associated with a 2 to 4 per­ cent decrease in C H D risk. H D L concentra­ tio n > 6 0 m g /d L ca n b e c o n s id e r e d a protective factor for C H D . Low H D L often is evidence of high levels o f other atherogenic lipoproteins and frequently accompanies other risk factors, such as insulin resistance, diabetes and elevated high blood pressure. This m ulti­ plicity of relationships may explain why low levels of H D L would predict C H D and would u n d e rs c o re th e im p o rta n c e o f m e a s u r­ ing HD L. H ig h T r ig ly c e r id e

ECHD = Early coronary disease. Ml = Myocardial infraction.

(TG) a n d

L ip o p ro te in R e m n a n ts

plaques.6 Lowering LD L-C is also considered effective in diminishing th e risk o f C H D m or­ bidity and mortality.7 Table IV outlines criteria and goals for treatm ent recom m ended for low­ ering LDL.

M ultiple analyses o f epidemiological data often disclosed that elevated triglyceride (TG) concentrations are not an independent risk factor for C H D . However, recent studies have suggested an independent association betw een TG and C H D .13’14,15,16 It is well known that triglyceride increases as H D L decreases. It is

TABLE II Lipid Abnormalities

Desirable

Borderline

High Risk

High Risk for Pancreatitis

Cholesterol

<200

200 - 239

>240

L D L -C

< 130

1 3 0 -1 5 9

>160

-

H D L -C Triglyceride TC/HDL»

>60 <200 < 5 .0

-

<35 >400 > 6.0

-

2 0 0 -4 0 0 5.0 - 6 . 0

-

> 1000 —

All in mg/dL except the TC /D H L. aNot yet recommended by ATP 1993, but it does provide substantial information about C H D .

129

R E V IE W O F RISK F A C T O R S F O R CA RD IO V A SC U LA R D ISE A S E S

TABLE III

L ip o p r o t e i n S u b c l a s s e s

National Cholesterol Education Program Classification for Children and Adolescents L D L -C (mg/DL) (mmoL/L) Desirable Borderline High risk

TC

<110 1 1 0 -1 2 9

2.85 2 .8 5 -3 .3 4

<170 1 7 0 -1 9 9

>130

3.36

> 200

now considered im portant clinically if high tri­ glyceride concentrations are detected during the fasting state. Elevated TG is associated with over-production of very low-density lipo­ protein (VLDL), im paired chylomicron and V LD L catabolism . T he im proper catabolic products o f chylomicron and VLDL—the socalled rem nants— are very atherogenic. They tend to bind to arterial endothelium and to the deendothelialized areas, w here locally present lip opro tein lipase will in itiate triglyceride hydrolysis and reduce the size of adhering par­ ticles. These then are allowed to en ter the deeper structures of the arterial wall, resulting in atherosclerosis. Increased serum triglycer­ ides can also effect changes in the size and com position o f H D L and L D L particles. Elevated serum triglyceride levels are strongly associated with small dense, and more athero­ genic, L D L particles. TABLE IV National Cholesterol Education Program Low -Density-Lipoprotein Cholesterol Decision Values (mg/dL)

Patient’s Condition

Therapy D iet Drug

Ideal G oal

(C H D Risk factor3) < 2 risk factors

>160

> 190

<160

> 2 risk factors

>130

> 160

<130

CHD

>100

> 130

<100

aRisk factors in Table I. Low HDL «.s.«.

and

M o d if ie d L D L

Lipoprotein particles are a heterogeneous mixture of lipoproteins. They differ from each other in size, density, lipid content and apolipoprotein composition as well as in function.17 D epending on the analytical methods used, H D L and LD L each can be resolved into a num ber of subfractions. The two major classes for H D L are H D L 2 and H D L 3.18 T he larger, lighter H D L 2, but not H D L 3, particles are decidedly associated with the extent and pro­ gression of C H D . H D L particles can also be separated into subfractions according to their apolipoprotein composition. H D L with apo AI only is the so-called LpAI particle, and H D L co n taining b o th AI and A ll is know n as L pA L A II. LpA I may re p re se n t th e a n ti­ atherogenic fraction o f H D L .19 Quantification of LpAI and LpALII allows for a m ore accu­ rate prediction of C H D risk. L D L also exists in subspecies that vary in size and density.20,21 The smaller dense L D L particles are more atherogenic because they have lower L D L -receptor binding capacity, but they have increased ability to bind to pro­ teoglycans on the arterial wall and greater oxi­ dative susceptibility. As well as separation of L D L into subfractions by particle diam eter, L D L subclasses pattern separated on 2 to 14 p ercent gradient polyacrylamide gel can be identified as phenotypes A and B. Phenotype A is characterized by a predom inance of large L D L particles, type B by a preponderance of smaller and denser L D L particles. Individuals with type B pattern are at higher risk for C H D . L D L particles are also known to be m odi­ fied through oxidation and glycation.22,23,24 These modified LD Ls are readily taken up by scavenger receptors. This process is not subject to feedback control and can result in accumulation of LD L in macrophage and e n d o th e lia l cells, m aking m od ified L D L highly atherogenic. L i p o p r o t e i n (a) [L p (a)]

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a cholesterol-rich plasma lipoprotein. Its structure is similar to

wu

130

that of LDL, but with an additional apolipoprotein (a) link to apo B through a disulfide bond. Elevated Lp(a) is related to prem ature cardiovascular disease and stroke.25-26 W hen the plasma concentration o f Lp(a) is above 30 mg/dL, the risk for C H D increases two-fold. W hen both L D L and Lp(a) are elevated, the risk is extended five-fold. The similarity in structure of Lp(a) to plas­ minogen and L D L may be the mechanism for atherosclerosis and thrombosis. In thrombosis, Lp(a) inhibits fibrinolysis by com peting with plasminogen for fibrin binding; it also impedes the activation of plasminogen by tissue specific plasminogen activator (t-PA). Lp(a) can carry cholestero l in to m acro p h ag e an d sm ooth muscle cells, which plays a role in foam cell formation. Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for C H D and can work synergistically with other factors to increase the risk. There is no meaningful way to treat elevated Lp(a) levels. Standard therapy, including diet, ch o lestero l synthesis in h ib ito rs, bile acid sequestrates and probucol, have no effect. Nia­ cin, neomycin and bezafibrate may have some beneficial result. Screening for Lp(a) concen­ tration is recom m ended for patients with coro­ nary disease or individuals with a family history of C H D , as well as patients with infarction or with elevated LD L, low H D L and renal or coagulation dysfunction. Patients w ith high Lp(a) should undergo aggressive therapy to eliminate other treatable risk factors and thus minimize overall C H D risk.

A p o lip o p ro te in

E ( a p o E) P o l y m o r p h i s m

Apo E functions as receptor-binding ligand to m ediate the interaction o f lipoproteins with the receptors and initiate th eir up-taking by the cell surface L D L receptor or receptorrelated proteins. Consequently, apo E plays a critical role in transporting triglycerides and cholesterol and in lipoprotein metabolism.27,28,29 The apo E gene is highly polymorphic. The three most comm on alleles are e2, e3 and e4. The combination of these alleles form ed six genotypes, which coded for six com m on p h e­

notypes: E2/2, E3/3, E4/4 and E2/3, E3/4, E 2/E 4.30 The th ree isoforms have different receptor-binding qualities and different bio­ logical properties. Com pared to apo E3, apo E4 has a higher and apo E 2 lower (less than 2 percent) binding ability. Apo E3 is the most com mon isoform in the general population and is identified as the wild type. ApoE polymorphism affects the efficiency o f dietary cholesterol absorption. In individu­ als with apo E4/3 and E4/4, the increase in plasma LD L-C concentrations is greater when dietary cholesterol intake rises. The effect of dietary fat intake on the increase of L D L cho­ lesterol follows the order in term s of pheno­ types with apo E4/3, 4/4 > apo E3/3 > apo E3/2. The response to drug treatm ent in the apo E phenotype is significantly different. Patients carrying E 4 have a lower response than those with the apo E2 phenotype.31 The composition of lipoprotein particles is influenced by the apo E phenotype. Apo E4 individuals are m ost likely to have smaller dense atherogenic L D L particles and are at greater risk for C H D . Apo E2 has a protective effect on C H D and is associated with longevity. Apo E2/2 is useful for confirming type III hyperlipidem ia (familial dysbetalipoproteinem ia).32 Type III hyperlipidemia is character­ ized by elevated plasma cholesterol and tri­ g ly cerid e levels an d by th e p re se n c e o f significant amounts of abnormal chylomicron and V LD L rem nants, which are collectively known as (3-VLDL. 3 -VLDL can be up-taken into peritoneal macrophages or smooth muscle through receptors. These P-VLDL receptors are not down-regulated by intracellular choles­ terol concentration. Thus, the massive choles­ terol accumulation can lead to foam cell for­ m ation and eventually to atherosclerosis. Apo E2 has a m uch lower affinity for receptors than is the case in E 3 or E4. Consequendy, individuals who are homozygous for the E2 allele (phenotype E2/2) are prone to a buildup of lipoprotein rem nant particles in their blood circulation. About 5 percent of E2 homozy­ gotes will evidence large quantities of rem nant particles as a result of the presence of an addi­ tional lipid-increasing factor w hich causes

R E V IE W O F RISK FA CT O RS F O R C A R D IO V A SC U LA R D ISE A S E S

elevated lipoprotein-exceeded apo E2/2 han­ dling ability. These factors can be excessive dietary cholesterol and/or fat intake, obesity, d iab etes or a g en e tic tra it such as L D L receptor m utation in familial hypercholesterolnem ia, th e re b y b rin g in g a b o u t type III hyperlipidemia. Diagnosis o f type III hyperli­ poproteinem ia is im portant. It is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis of both the c o ro n ary an d p e rip h e ra l a rte rie s , w hich responds extremely well to dietary and fibrateclass drag therapy.33 H o m o c y s t e in e

Hom ocysteine (Hey) is a thiol-containing amino acid. In plasma, 70 to 80 percent of Hey is present in protein-bound form, primarily bound to albumin. T he rem ainder exists as dimers of homocysteine (homocystine), mixed disulfides and only trace am ount as free thiol (homocysteine). Currently, all forms are col­ lectively called to tal plasm a hom ocysteine (tHcy). M ore than a dozen enzymes and cofac­ tors have a role in the complex processes to m aintain th e hom eostasis o f hom ocysteine. D eficien cy o r d y sfu n ctio n o f any o f th e enzymes or cofactors (such as vitamins B6 or B12 or folate) involved in the Hey metabolism may raise levels o f homocysteine in the blood circulation. Elevated homocysteine is an inde­ p en d en t risk factor for atherosclerosis and thrombosis.34,35,36 Elevated tH cy also acts synergistically with other risk factors, such as high LDL-C, Lp(a) and fibrinogen. Extrem ely high levels o f tH cy may be attributed to a major gene effect. Plasma tH cy levels are also influ­ enced by polygenic and environm ental factors. tH cy levels are im pacted by age, by a history of smoking and by many drugs. These factors are listed in table V. Homocysteinuria is a rare form o f inborn errors of metabolism (1:200,000 to 500,000). The most com m on form results from defi­ ciency of cysthionine-p-synthase. O thers may involve m ethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase or methyltransferase. T he major gene defect causes the enzyme to lose m ore than 90 p e r­ cent o f its activity. Hom ocysteinuria is charac-

131

TABLE V Factors Causing Elevated Plasma Homocysteine Enzyme defects-genetic factors Cystathionine p synthase 5 , 1 0-M ethylene tetrahydrofolate reductase Methionine synthase Cobalamin (B 12) metabolism disorder Vitamin deficiencies B 12, B 6 and folate Diseases Renal and liver failure Acute lymphoblastic leukemia Drugs Methotrexate, nitrous oxide, metformin, phenytoin antagonists, anticonvulsants, 6-azaurdine Age and gender

terized by extrem e elevation of plasma hom o­ cysteine (50 to 500 |xmol/L). Patients with homocysteinuria are at high risk at an early age for pulm onary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, arterial occlusion or venous throm ­ boembolism. Thirty percent of homocystein­ uria individuals experience a throm boem bolic event by age 30, and their mortality rate is 20 percent before age 20. M oderately elevated plasma Hey is present in 5 to 7 percent of the general population and 20 to 40 p erce n t of cardiovascular disease patients. Recent clinical studies indicate that m oderately elevated plasma Hey (15 to 50 (xmol/L) is an independent predictor for ath­ erosclerosis and thromboembolism. It is linked w ith cerebral, peripheral and cardiovascular diseases. Patients with homocysteinemia are also at risk for deep vein thrombosis and p re­ m ature occlusive vascular disease. Individuals w ith homocysteinemia and coagulating factor defects such as Factor-V (Leiden) m utation may experience thrombosis at a very young age. Nygard recently dem onstrated a strong, graded connection betw een the plasma Hey level and overall mortality in patients diag­ nosed with angiographically-confirmed C H D .

132

wu TABLE VI Normal Reference Range for Plasma Homocysteine (Fasting)

Age Group

N ew born

Adole­ scents

Adult M ale

Adult Fem ale

Elderly

Centena~ riants

1 5 -2 0

2 5 -2 7

Plasma Hey (|o.M)

3 -6

5 -8

6 -1 5

3 -1 2

Hey = Homocysteine.

In this group, the four-year mortality was 3.8 percent, versus 24 percent if their plasma Hey level had been <9 versus ^ 1 5 (xmol/L.37,38 The normal range (table VI) is commonly set at 5 to 15 mol/L. Since plasma Hey is a graded risk factor, the risk for vascular diseases increases progressively with plasma Hey con­ centration. Ideally, th e plasm a level of Hey should be below 10 |i,mol/L. F ib r i n o g e n

Elevated plasma concentration of fibrinogen is linked to cardiovascular disease.39 Excessive concentration of plasm a fibrinogen has a pow­ erful, independent effect on the onset and pro­ gression of ischemic heart disease, stroke and low er e x tre m ity a rte ria l d isease. It also increases the risk o f reocclusion after grafting and angioplasty. A high co n c e n tra tio n o f fibrinogen broadens th e risk for thrombosis through a variety of mechanisms, including formation of atherom a, increase o f blood vis­ cosity and platelet aggregation and formation of fibrin and clots. R eferen ces 1. The expert panel, report of the national cholesterol education program expert panel on detection, evalu­ ation, and treatm ent of high cholesterol in adults. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:36-69. 2. The expert panel, summary of the 2nd report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high cholesterol in adults (adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 1993;269:3015-3023. 3. Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 1992;152:56-64.

4. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Eng J Med 1995;333:13011307. 5. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infrac­ tion in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Eng J Med 1996;335:1001-1009. 6 . Scandinavian Simvastatin survival study group. Ran­ domized trial of cholesterol lowering 4444 patients with coronary disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin survival study(4S). Lancet 1994;344:1383-1389. 7. Gordon DJ. Cholesterol lowering and total mortality, In: Lowering cholesterol in high risk individuals and populations. Rifland RM. Ed New York, NY: Dekker; 1995. 8 . Miller NE, Ford OH, Thelle DS, Mjos OD: The Tromso heart study. High density lipoprotein and coronary heart disease: a prospective case control study. Lancet 1977;1:965-968. 9. Gordon T, Kannel WB. Castelli WP, Dawber TR: Lipoproteins, cardiovascular disease, and death. The Framingham study. Arch Intern Med 1981;141:1128— 1131. 10. Assmann G, Schulte H. PROCAM-trail. Panscientia Verlag, Hrdingen, Zurich 1986. 11. Barter PJ, Rye KA. High density lipoprotein and coro­ nary disease. Atherosclerosis 1996;121:1-12. 12. Hausmann D, Johnson JA, Sudhir K, Mullen WL, et al. Angiographically silent atherosclerosis detected by intravascular ultrasound in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia: correlation with high density lipoproteins. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1562-1570. 13. Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride and coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Throm 1990;11:1-14. 14. Krauss RM, William PT, Brensike J, D etre KM, Lindgen FT, et al. Intermediate-density lipoprotein and progression of coronary artery disease in hypercholesterolemic men. Lancet 1987;ii:62-66. 15. Zilversmit DB. Atherogenic nature of triglycerides, postprandial lipidemia, and triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins. Clin Chem 1995;41:153-158. 16. Hodis HN, Mack WJ. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and the progression of coronary artery disease. Cur­ rent Opinion in Lipidology 1995;6:209-214. 17. Roheim PS, Asztalos BF. Clinical significance of lipo­ protein size and risk for coronary atherosclerosis. Clin Chem 1995;41:147-152.

R E V IE W O F RISK FA CT O RS F O R C A R D IO V A SC U LA R D ISE A S E S

18. Lamarche B, Mooijani S, Cantin B. Association of HDL2 and HD L3 subfractions with ischemic heart disease in men. Arterioscler Throm Vase Biol 1997; 17:1098-1105. 19. Duriez P, Fruchart JC. Determination and clinical significance of lipoprotein particles LpA-I and ApALA-II. In: Rifai N, W amick GR, Dominiczak MH, eds. Handbook of lipoprotein testing. AACC Press, 1997:441-450. 20. Krauss RM. Low density lipoprotein subclass pattern and risk of coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 1991;2:2458-52. 21. Austin MA, Brunzel JD, Fitch WI, Krauss RM. Low density lipoprotein subclass pattern in familial com­ bine hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb 1990;10: 97-106. 22. Witztum JL, Steigberg D. Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. J Clin Invest 1991;88: 1785-1792. 23. Steigberg D. Low density lipoprotein oxidation and its pathobiological significance. J Biol Chem 1997;272: 20963-20966. 24. Lyons TJ, Jenkins AJ. Lipoprotein glycation and its metabolic consequences. Curr Opin Lipidol 1997;8: 174-180. 25. Scanu A, Fless GM. Lipoprotein (a): heterogeneity and biological relevance. J Clin Invest 1990;85:17091715. 26. Maher VMG, Brown BG. Lipoprotein (a) and coro­ nary heart disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 1995;6:223228. 27. Mahley RW, Innerarity TL. Apolipoprotein E: Cho­ lesterol transport protein with expanding roles in cell biology. Science 1988;240:622-30. 28. Dallongeville J, Lussier-Cacan S, Davigon J. Modula­ tion of plasma triglyceride levels by apo E phenotype: a meta analysis. J Lipid Res 1992;33:447-54. 29. Davigon J, Gregg RE, Sing CF. Apolipoprotein poly­ morphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 1988; 8 : 1- 2 1 .

30. W eintraub MS, Eisenberg S, Breslow JL. Dietary fat clearance in normal subjects is regulated by genetic

133

variation in apolipoprotein E. J Clin Invest 1987;80: 1571-7. 31. O’Malley JP, Illingworth DR. The influence of apo E phenotype on the response to simvastatin treatm ent in patient with heterozygous familial hypercholesterol­ emia. Metabolism 1990;39:1 5 0 ^. 32. Hopkins PN, Wu LL, Schumacher MC, et al. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia and apo E2: evidence for a gene interaction. Arterioscler Thromb 1991; 11: 1137-46. 33. W u LL, W u JT, Hopkins PN. Apolipoprotein E: Laboratory determination and clinical significance. In: Rifai N, Wamick R, eds. Laboratory measurement of lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins. Sterling Pub­ lishing Service, 1994:16. 34. McCully KS. Homocysteine and vascular disease. Nature Medicine 1996;2:386-389. 35. W u LL, Wu JT, Hunt SC, Williams RR, Hopkins PN. Plasma homocyst(e)ine as a risk factor for early famil­ ial coronaiy disease. Clin Chem 1994;40:552-^561. 36. Hopkins PN, W u LL, W u J, Williams RR. Higher plasma homocysteine and increased susceptibility to adverse effects of low folate in early familial coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Throm Vase Biol 1995;15: 1314-1320 37. Nygard O. Plasma homocysteine levels and mortality in patients with coronary disease. N Eng J Med 1997; 337:230-236. 38. Harpel PC, Zhang Z, Borth W. Homocysteine and homeostasis: pathogenic mechanism predisposing to thrombosis. J Nutr 1996;126:1285S-1289S. 39. Kannel WB, W olf PA, Castille, D ’Agostini RB. Fibrinogen and risk of cardiovascular disease: The Framingham study. JAMA 1987;258:1185-1186. 40. Montalescot G, Ankri, Vicaut E, Drobinski G, Grosgogeat Y, Thomas D. Fibrinogen after coronary angio­ plasty as a risk factor to restenosis. Circulation 1995; 92:31-38.

Loading...

Review of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases*

ANNALS O F CLIN IC AL AND LABORATORY SC IEN CE, Vol. 29, No. 2 Copyright © 1999, Institute for Clinical Science, Inc. R eview o f Risk Factors for Ca...

525KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents

Prevalence of Risk Factors for Chronic Non-communicable Diseases
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study, that included a random sample of 200 adults, was conducted. A study tool

10_referencia_bibliografica | Childbirth | Cardiovascular Diseases
Foundations of Psychohistory. Livro disponível na internet. Disponível em: www.psychohistory.com/html. Acesso em: 28 d

Cardiovascular Diseases | Veterian Key
Jun 8, 2016 - Systemic and pulmonary circulations are arranged in series, therefore cardiac output (CO) from the left ve

Dietary whey protein lessens several risk factors for metabolic diseases
Jun 7, 2012 - [19] found a protective effect against oxidative stress, mainly in the liver, and a beneficial effect on r

JI Rendy.pdf | Cardiovascular Diseases | Obesity
JI Rendy.pdf - Download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online.

Morbidity and Risk Factors of Diarrheal Diseases - Oxford Journals
by Khaled Yassin. Department 2: Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Bielefeld, Germany. Summa

Risk factors for Breast Cancer Risk factors for Breast - 123Slide.Org
Oct 28, 2017 - 1. Diet, Lifestyle and Breast Cancer Risk Barbour S Warren, PhD Program on Breast Cancer & Environmental

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cardiovascular risk factors in - Revistas USP
22. Bullen C. Impact of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular risk and disease. Expert. Rev Cardiovasc

Cardiovascular risk factors and body fat distribution in brazilians aged
Schmidt MI, et al. Doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no. Brasil: prioridade para enfrentamento e investigação. Rev. Sa

Causes, Risk Factors, and Prevention Risk Factors for Brain and
spinal cord tumor. Different types of cancer have different risk factors. Some risk factors, like smoking, you can chang