Idea Transcript
PLUS
CONSULTING
BLOG
ACCOUNT
Trends - Strategy Monetization - Analytics
Strategy Reviews Guidance
Thoughts Newsletter
Subscribe Sign-in
FREE
By Thomas Baekdal - September 2014
Stop Thinking People are Shallow One of the most persistent and also completely misleading behavior online is how
Newsletter
media companies and brands think people want shallow content. And this is especially
Subscribe to the Baekdal Plus newsletter to stay up-to-date about the latest trends. Sent out once per week. Get the newsletter
the case for brands trying to reach younger audiences. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen media companies define a new 'young' strategy around short articles or videos that are only about 30-90 seconds long. Or how brands are encouraged to create ultra-short videos to 'drive engagement'. Part of the problem is a complete failure to use analytics. They are measuring
More from Baekdal Plus
averages for their traffic overall, and the result is always a terribly low number. And
Publishers Need to Rethink How They Define Trust
length.
from this they conclude that people actually want content that is less than a minute in
This is what we in analytic circles call a failure to segment your data. Think about it like this: Imagine you have 1,000 visitors and a total 'time on page' of 400 minutes. You divide them and you learn that, on average, each visitor only spends 24 seconds on each page. But that's the average. It's useless number. What if you started segmenting people on three other factors: Those who clicked but didn't read/view anything at all
Most publishers define trust in terms of facts, but real trust is about value.
Those who started reading/viewing, but dropped out before reaching the end Those who completed reading/viewing the full length of your content.
39 pages
You might find something like this:
A Guide to Journalists Thinking about Starting an Individual Media Company
Fifty people read/viewed the content until the very end (this is your real audience). 125 people started reading/viewing, but lost interest (this is your potential audience, which you failed to capture). And a staggering 825 people didn't even take any time to read anything (this is not your audience. It's just people who randomly clicked on a linked without knowing what to expect). Then we look at time spent in each group: The 50 people spent five minutes on average. The 125 people spent one minute on average before losing interest. And the 825 people only spent 2 seconds on the page (not enough time to do anything else than read the headline).
What do you need to consider as a journalist if you are dreaming of starting your own individual media company? 46 pages
How Publishers can get Started with AI
This is the real world for most publishers. A substantial part of the measured traffic isn't actually traffic at all. How would you fix this? Should you make your content shorter? Not really. The 825 people won't care either way. They spent so little time on the page that it really doesn't matter if the content was twenty minutes, five minutes or 30 seconds long. They have long gone either way.
30 pages
You might say that you could use deceptive headlines or images to trick people into staying (like what we see from most viral sites), but that doesn't create a usable
Yes, We can fix the distribution problem
audience. Trying to convince people who really don't care about you, to stay a little longer by using a deceptive headline, is not a good way to create conversions. What about the 125 people who started viewing, but lost interest? Could we do something with them? Well... that depends. Why did they lose interest? Was it because the content was too long (highly unlikely), or because the content wasn't good enough or inspiring enough for their liking (very likely). We see this on YouTube every single day. There is a very simple way to see if people prefer shorter videos over longer ones. Just go to any popular YouTube page and check their most popular videos.
34 pages
Here is a selection:
Making Journalists and Editors Relevant to a Digital Audience
Bethany Mota
34 pages
VSauce
Rethinking The Digital Future of Magazines: A Case study
NerdCubed
38 pages
We Need to Drastically Rethink The News Startups
PewDiePie 26 pages
How Would I Create a Newspaper from Scratch, as a Media Analyst?
Kirsten Dirksen
32 pages
BuzzFeed Tasty is Fascinating
Scott Manley 20 pages
How Big Publishers Can Embrace Individual Media
Bondi Harvest
24 pages
Motortrend
EvanTubeHD
CurtisParadise
Monster Energy
Do you see a trend here? Yep, almost none of these videos are short. And, there is zero correlation between how long the video is and how popular it is. So, why do so many media people think shorter videos are the way to win? And why do so many social media sites encourage you to 'optimize your videos' to be 30-90 seconds long? Where on Earth do they get that idea from? There is absolutely nothing that even remotely indicates that creating short videos is a particularly good strategy. And there is nothing that indicates that younger people prefer short videos. Or look at Minecraft, which has 100+ million users. Here are the most popular videos from one of the most popular Minecraft channels, YOGSCAST Lewis & Simon, with 7 million subscribers:
Look at the 3rd most popular video. It's more than 17 minutes long and has more than 11 million views. But not only that, it's 'part 1' of a series of 11 videos, each about 15 minutes long. And each one has been seen more than 3.5 million times. That's almost three hours of video. So, tell me again, why do you think short content is the way to go? Where are you getting that from? The reality is that the length has almost no impact on how well something is received. The differentiating factor is what people gain from it. If it's influential, distinctive, creative, inspiring, awesome and something you have put some effort into, you have a winner. The put it simply, this is the best way to create a video or an article: Make it insightful and in depth. Base it on a story, a goal, and an achievement. Put some effort into the editing it, but don't go overboard and make it look like an ad. In short (*smile*), do this:
Read also my two part series about the future of individual media. "The Amazing Future of Individual Media" and "The Economics of Individual Media".
Thomas Baekdal
The Baekdal Plus Newsletter is the best way to be notified about the latest media reports, but it also comes with extra insights.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter "Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media." Swedish business magazine, Resumé
Get the newsletter
PLUS
PLUS
FREE
— strategy —
STRATEGY:
Publishers Need to Rethink How They Define Trust
PLUS
Publishers Haven't Realized Just How Big a Deal GDPR is
A Guide to Journalists Thinking about Starting an Individual Media Company
FREE
STRATEGY:
FREE
STRATEGY:
STRATEGY:
STRATEGY:
The Elusive Direct Relationship with Your Readers
Can Your Readers Trust You With Their Time?
STRATEGY:
How Publishers can get Started with AI
Plus
Consulting
Baekdal Media
Trends Strategy Monetization Anlytics Books
Do you want to understand the many changes that we see in the world of media? Do you want to know how they will impact you specifically? Get in touch.
About Baekdal Your account Contact Privacy