Idea Transcript
Sons and Daughters Publication
eJournalDirect Preserving wisdom for all.
About
Journals
Be a Reviewer
Login Account
Proceedings Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Science Research Home Page // Journal // Volume // Article
Aim and Scope | Board of Editors | Peer Reviewer Procedure | Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement | Submission | Indexing Info
All submissions to PJEPSSR must be through the International Conference on Education, Psychology and Social Science (ICEPSS).
Open Access
The submissions will be assigned to at least two independent referees who have professional backgrounds in the related subject area to determine the validity for presentation in the conference. To submit a paper, please visit www.icepss.net and view the online submission system at http://icepss.net/submission-form/ Author Guidelines 1. Scope Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Education E-learning Special Education Higher Education Rehabilitation Counseling Language Education Human Resource Development Elementary Education Rural Education Early Childhood Education Curriculum, Research, and Development Education Policy and Leadership Social Studies Education ESL/TESL Educational Measurement and Evaluation Psychology Cognitive, Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Social Learning and Systems Approaches to Marriage and the Family Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adults Prevention and Early Intervention: Child Disorders, Substance Abuse, and Delinquency Advances in Clinical Behavior Therapy Aggression and Violence throughout the Lifespan Educational and Psychological Sciences Child Abuse: New Directions in Prevention and Treatment across the Lifespan Ideal Mental Health Services Childhood Disorders: Behavioral-Developmental Approaches Suicide: Prediction, Prevention and Intervention Cognitive task analysis Violence in the Lives of Children and Families Stress: Vulnerability and Resiliency Social Science Globalization Impacts Social Research or Social Science Online Society or Online Community Feminism Social and Organizational Networks Sociology of Everyday Life Contemporary Sociological Theory Social Work 2. Submission All submissions to PJEPSS must be made using the online submission system integrated with the official web site of ICEPSS. The submissions will be assigned to at least two independent referees who have professional backgrounds in the related subject area. To submit a paper, please go to the submission page. 3. Manuscript Format All submissions must include the following elements: title, abstract, key words, results and discussion, and references. References should appear at the end of the paper. Figures should be placed exactly where they are to appear within the text. Submitted papers must use one-column formatting with single-spaced text in a 11-point font. The submitted full paper is limited to 8 pages. All papers should be written in English. An abstract is essential for each paper with 100 to 200 words. 3.1. Manuscript Format: Abstract An abstract is essential for each paper with 100 to 200 words. The abstract should state the objectives of the work, summarize the results, and give the principal conclusions. Abstracts must not include mathematical expressions or bibliographic references. Nonstandard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself. 3.2. Manuscript Format: Figures and Tables Figures include graphs of results, schematic drawings, samples of output screen dumps, and photographs of special equipment or displays. Each figure should be numbered and have a caption. Care should be taken to ensure that the legends and labels within the figure are large enough to be readable after they are reduced. For final submissions, high quality (at least 600 dpi) figures should be included. Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. 3.3. Manuscript Format: Reference Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text. The followings are examples for references: Citation from a journal: Blunt, R. J. S. (2005). Challenges for the curriculum of a comprehensive university: A case study. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(6), 1021-1032. Online Journal: Weinstein., Ryan, S. W., DeHaan, R. C., Przybylski, Legate, N., Ryan, M. R. (2012). Parental Autonomy and discrepancies Between Implicit And Explicit Sexual Identities: Dynamics of Self-Acceptance and Defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 ( 4), 815–832. DOI: 10.1037/n0026854. Book: Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University. Sucuoğlu, B. (2005). Autism and children with autistic disorder. In A. Ataman (Ed.), Children with special needs and introduction to special education (pp. 391-412). Ankara: Gunduz Education and Publishing. Website: Chua, C. (2004). Perception of quality in higher education. Proceedings in the Australian universities quality forum 2004 AUQA Occasional Publication. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.auqa.edu/auqf/2004/program /papers/chua.pdf Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2006). Higher education in further education colleges: Consultation on HEFCE policy. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from http://www.hefceac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_48/06_48.pdf 4. Review Process The submitted manuscripts are evaluated by anonymous referees for originality, relevance, and presentation. The review is a double blind peer reviewing in which both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.Revisions requested by the editor should be submitted through which will be forwarded directly to that editor. After the refereeing process is complete, a handing editor makes a decision for acceptance or rejection. There are two types of revisions: major or minor. For a major revision, original referees will be invited to review the manuscript again, and make a recommendation. For a minor revision, no more reviews are required, the handing editor makes the final decision of acceptance if both the content and format are acceptable. 5. Once Accepted If the reviewed manuscript is acceptable, we will send you a detailed guide and an author checklist for final manuscript submission requirements. And each author will be asked to sign and submit a copyright form, which formally accepts their copyright transfer to the journal publisher, Sons and Daughters Publishing House Inc. In addition, she or he should be registered participants in the conference. Note that this conference registration fee is inclusive of the publication. The manuscript will not be published without both the signed copyright form and the payment of the registration fee. 6. Contact Information For further details and/or if you have any questions/suggestions, please do not hesitate to contact the editorial board or directly Editor-in-Chief of PJEPSSR. 7. Submission Preparation Checklist As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission s compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration. The submission file is in Word format (US letter size). The base font is Times New Roman-like, and the sans-serif font is Helvetica. The text is single-spaced; uses a 11-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in this author guideline. 8. Privacy Statement The names and email addresses entered in the submission system of ICEPSS will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of PJEPSSR and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Dadte Published: 2014-05-22 ISSN Print: 2362-8251 ISSN online: 2423-1924 DOI: 10.21016/PJEPSSR.05222414
Article
Factors Affecting the Academic Achievements among Dean’s Listers of Caraga State University Pages 68 - 77 Cristina A. Cubillas (Corresponding Author) View All DOI: 10.21016/ICEPSS.14023 Publication History Manuscript Received: Jan 1, 1970 Manuscript Accepted: Jan 1, 1970 Date Published On line: Jan 1, 1970 How to Cite
Publication Agreement View agreement here
Abstract The study assessed the relationship between the factors affecting the academic achievement of the dean’s listers’ of Caraga State University. It involves the total population of the dean’s listers in the said university. The independent variables are those predetermined factors’ affecting the academic achievement of the dean’s listers’ of Caraga State University and the dependent variable is the grades of the dean’s listers’. The result shows the low relationship between the pre-determined factors and the academic achievement evidenced by the values of the p-values which are greater than . In terms of the academic achievement of the dean’s listers’ their grades signifies their excellence in their different chosen fields. With regards to the pre-determined factors, the factor that got the highest mean is the teachers’ competence with 3.7639 and the lowest one is the learning environment with 3.6690. The study habits’ got the second spot among the 4 factors followed by the learning styles. Based on Spearmen Correlation analysis in the data gathered, the results revealed that there is no significant relationship between the pre-determined factors and the academic achievement of the dean’s listers’ of Caraga State University. The p-values obtained are less than 0.05 for all the data set; that is accepting the null hypothesis. The results clearly depicts that the students’ study habit, learning style teachers’ competence and the learning environment has no influence to the achievement reached by the dean’s listers’. On the other hand, it is still very important to make and to maintain these factors visible in the academic arena for a better learning and for a better outcome. The absence of these factors might affect the performances of the students’ in Caraga State University.
Key Words Dean’s listers, academic achievement, learning style
No Table and Figures Full Paper
References 1. Balagot, S., et.al. (2008). “ Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles in Relation with the Academic Performance of 2nd year Students in Agusan National High School.” 2. Ganut, L. and Gementiza, B. (2006).” Factors Affecting the Academic Performance of the Science Class Students of BCNHS Bayugan, Agusan del Sur.” 3. Purita P. Bilbao, Brenda B. Corpuz, Avelina T. Llagas & Gloria G. Salandanan (2012). “The Teaching Profession”.
Under Creative Common License Copyright © The Author peer review under the responsibility of
e-JOURNALDIRECT
S. D. P. H. I.