The Attractiveness of Internal Medicine: A ... - CiteSeerX - Penn State [PDF]

graduating medical students from the class of 1990 in. 16 medical schools. Medical students were asked the open-ended qu

25 downloads 31 Views 1MB Size

Recommend Stories


The Penn State Scandal
Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes, including you. Anne Lamott

Penn State
Learn to light a candle in the darkest moments of someone’s life. Be the light that helps others see; i

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Penn State College Of Medicine Application for
You can never cross the ocean unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore. Andrè Gide

State Exams in INTERNAL MEDICINE Members of State Commissions
Don't count the days, make the days count. Muhammad Ali

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of ... - Penn Medicine [PDF]
Dec 16, 2015 - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 5Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 6University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston; 7Cooper Medical School of Rowan University,. Camden, New Jersey; 8University of Pennsylva

Internal Medicine Just the Facts Pdf
At the end of your life, you will never regret not having passed one more test, not winning one more

History of Penn State Forest
You have to expect things of yourself before you can do them. Michael Jordan

Penn State Geosciences
Where there is ruin, there is hope for a treasure. Rumi

Penn State Geosciences
The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together.

department of internal medicine
Forget safety. Live where you fear to live. Destroy your reputation. Be notorious. Rumi

Idea Transcript


ACADEMIA

AND

CLINIC

The Attractiveness of Internal Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Female and Male Medical Students Julia E. McMurray, MD; Mark D. Schwartz, MD; Nancy P. Genero, PhD; and Mark Linzer, MD; for the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Career Choice in Internal Medicine

• Objective: To understand better the decline in medical student interest in internal medicine. • Design: Qualitative analysis of 500 essays from respondents who participated in a national survey of graduating medical students from the class of 1990 in 16 medical schools. Medical students were asked the open-ended question, "What suggestions do you have for improving the attractiveness of internal medicine?" A model of career choice was developed for the analysis that included the following factors: ambulatory care exposure and primary care (including relationships with patients); attending physician-student interactions and learning climate; stress and workload; income and prestige; and intellectual stimulation. • Participants: The original survey included 1650 fourthyear medical students; 500 essay respondents were stratified by sex and then randomly chosen for the analysis. • Results: Students most frequently suggested that ambulatory care experiences be increased and that better relationships with patients be established during medical training (65% of women and 50% of men, P < 0.01). The second most frequent suggestion was to improve internal medicine attending physicians' interactions with students (51% and 48% of women and men, respectively). Students who had seriously considered a career in medicine but switched to other primary care careers (general pediatrics, family medicine) had few concerns about income and prestige, whereas those who chose internal medicine had reservations about expected workload and income. Women were more likely than men to reject internal medicine for other primary care fields (26% of women compared with 16% of men, P = 0.05). • Conclusions: Students, particularly female students, expressed a strong interest in establishing better relationships with patients. Lack of respect by medical attendings and negative teaching methods were important sources of dissatisfaction among both men and women. Attention to these relationship issues, in addition to housestaff stress and expected future income, may improve the attractiveness of internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:812-818. From Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts; New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; and New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. For current author addresses, see end of text. *For a full listing of the participants and co-investigators in the Society of General Internal Medicine survey on career choice, see reference 6. 812

B e t w e e n 1985 and 1993, the number of U.S. medical graduates matching in 3-year residency programs in internal medicine declined by more than 30% (1). Research has focused on various suspected causes for the decline, including difficult training conditions for interns and residents, the perception of decreasing satisfaction among practicing internists, issues related to income and debt, dissatisfaction with caring for patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and loss of idealism (2-7). Few studies have been done, however, in which investigators asked large numbers of students in an open-ended fashion to express their concerns about a career in internal medicine. In the National Medical Student Career Choice Survey, we surveyed a representative sample of graduating medical students from the class of 1990 (6). Students responded to a 10-page structured questionnaire using a Likert-scale format regarding perceptions of and influences on a career choice in internal medicine. Results of the study showed that internal medicine was perceived as more stressful and demanding and as less satisfying and rewarding compared with other fields. Key factors turning students away from internal medicine included 1) the nature of the patients seen in internal medicine; and 2) the view that medical residents and practicing internists are overworked and dissatisfied. Our initial report, however, seemed to tell only part of the story. The data generated several questions. Why was internal medicine felt to be less satisfying and rewarding compared with other professions? Were financial problems more important than we initially found; did a social-desirability bias exist that prevented students from acknowledging this issue in standard Likertscale format? Did women and men perceive internal medicine differently, and could the experiences or values of women account for their known affinity for primary care careers? And finally, what was the intensity of the perceptions? Our focus groups, which began the project and led to the initial questionnaire, involved many students with powerful feelings about negative experiences during medical school. These experiences seemed not to have been reflected in the Likert-scale responses (such as the experience of a student who told us, "After the way I was treated by my attending during my medical clerkship, I would never have anything to do with the profession again. I'm going into OB!"). We thus became interested in the responses to the open-ended question that concluded our survey instrument. This question asked, "What suggestions do you have for improving the attractiveness of internal medi-

© 1993 American College of Physicians

Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

Table 1. Model of Career Choice Ambulatory care exposure; primary care; relationships with patients Interpersonal connections with patients Difficult patients Ambulatory care-outpatient experiences Attending-student interaction and learning climate Role models Feedback Learning climate Perceived presence of support Stress and workload Time demands for resident and physician Ability to balance family and career Workload issues Income and prestige Intellectual stimulation Thinking and problem-solving Mastery, autonomy, control Competency; ability to master material

cine?" Eight hundred and twenty-one students wrote lengthy responses (some totaling an entire page of text). The intensity of feeling was clear throughout each essay, and the social-desirability bias appeared to lift, as many students said simply, "Pay us more." Overall, the responses to this question appeared to provide a fuller, more valid, and more personal perspective, with the whole picture coming more into focus. To analyze these data, we selected 500 responses for a qualitative analysis. This method entails breaking essays into discrete statements or phrases and then tabulating the phrases by frequency in order to assess the prevalence of concerns. Importantly, in a qualitative analysis, direct quotations are presented so that the words of the students are not lost in the frequency tabulations. Qualitative analysis, as a "rich source of descriptions that help explain processes," possesses an "undeniability" (8, 9), a reality that is difficult to ignore. The result of our qualitative research was an in-depth understanding of the student's perspective. This type of research provides access to the meanings that emerge from and guide behavior (9). Through a synthesis of our previous data (6), new theories on the significance of interpersonal relationships (10, 11), and current literature on the careerchoice process (3-5), we developed a model to reveal explanations for career-choice issues that closed-ended questionnaires did not elicit. We present the results of this qualitative analysis and provide new evidence about the importance of relationships among students, patients, and teachers during medical training as a factor in improving the attractiveness of internal medicine. Methods Students The study design for the career-choice survey has been described previously (6). In brief, the original survey targeted graduating students (n = 1650) from the class of 1990 at 16 randomly selected medical schools. A stratified cluster-sampling design was used, with funding status (private or public) and percent of students choosing internal medicine (high or low) as stratification variables. An interval-scale questionnaire was used to elicit students' responses to questions regarding

their perceptions of internal medicine and influences on career choice. Students were also asked to tell whether they had ever seriously considered a career in internal medicine but had switched to another career or whether they had decided to stay in internal medicine. Twelve hundred and forty-four students (76%) responded to the career-choice questionnaire. Thirty-seven percent were female and 63% were male. The results of the closed-ended questions have been published previously (6). Of the 1244 responders, 821 (66%) wrote responses to the open-ended question at the end of the questionnaire. The gender distribution of these 821 responders was similar to the overall gender mix. The 423 students who replied to the questionnaire but did not complete the open-ended question were similar to the essay responders in terms of sex, demographic characteristics, and other key variables, such as school type (public or private), marital status, and debt. Students were more likely to respond to the essay if they had children (73% compared with 64% without children, P = 0.037). For our analysis, we selected a sample of 500 from among the 821 essay responders. These students were stratified by sex and then randomly chosen from within each sex category. An a priori assumption was made that women and men would differ in their responses, and therefore similar numbers of women and men were chosen for analysis. Qualitative Analysis Using a standard qualitative approach (8, 9), we did our analysis as follows: First, we developed a career-choice model. This model incorporated the factor analysis of career-choice influences found in our original report (6), recent literature on the career-choice process (3-5), and evidence for the importance of interpersonal relationships in human growth and development (10, 11). A 10% sample of the 821 respondents to the open-ended question was independently reviewed by the investigators to further refine the factors that would eventually compose the model. This subset of respondents was subsequently excluded from the study sample. The final model was refined through an iterative process among the investigators. Model for Determinants of Career Choice Our career-choice model (Table 1) included five main factors: ambulatory care exposure and primary care; attending physician-student interactions and learning climate; workload and stress; income and status; and intellectual stimulation. Based on a preliminary assessment, the five main factors were further subdivided into components to reflect more accurately their content and meaning. The ambulatory exposure-primary care factor included issues relating to the appeal and difficulties of primary care, the value of interpersonal connections with patients, and issues relating to the care of difficult patients. The attending physician-student interaction factor included items regarding role models, feedback, teaching climate, identification, and perceived support from attendings, residents, and peers. The workload and stress factor included issues relating to time demands, the balance between family and career, and worksite-workload problems. Income, status, and prestige composed one category, as they have in previous research (4). Finally, the intellectual stimulation factor included components that related to thinking and problem-solving and to mastery, competency, and autonomy in the learning environment (Table 1). The remaining comments were grouped under categories labeled "personal preference" and "the trouble with medicine and medical school in general." Such comments were not included in the analysis because either they were not a suggestion for improving the attractiveness of internal medicine (for example, "you either just like medicine or you don't") or were too vague to provide useful information ("medicine is bad because of society these days"). The codes were selected to be exhaustive and mutually exclusive. Coding Discrete phrases from the 500 essays were then identified by two of the authors, who were blinded to the sex of the respon-

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8 Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

813

had obtained honors in their medicine clerkship. Women were more likely than men to have chosen a career in primary care medicine, pediatrics, or family practice (37% compared with 23%, respectively; P < 0.001). Factors Influencing Career Choice in Internal Medicine

Phrase frequency was tabulated by gender and by eventual career choice, first using the number of phrases and then the number of students as the unit of analysis. The chi-square statistic was used to calculate the statistical significance of differences.

We coded 1512 phrases (776 from women and 736 from men) that related to improving the attractiveness of internal medicine. Women and men wrote an average of 3 phrases (range, 1 to 12 phrases per female student and 1 to 10 phrases per male student). Twenty-seven percent of the coded phrases from women concerned relationships with patients and primary care compared with 21% of the phrases from men (P < 0.01) (Table 2). Similar proportions of phrases from women and men pertained to learning climate or relationships with attendings and residents (20% and 21%, respectively) and to stress and workload (13% and 17%, respectively). However, only 12% of women's phrases had to do with income and status compared with 17% of men's phrases (P < 0.01). Overall, when phrases relating to students' interpersonal relationships with both patients and attendings were compared with those about income and status, phrases about relationships were noted approximately four times more frequently than financial concerns by women (47% compared with 12%) and 2.5 times more frequently by men (42% compared with 17%). The results were similar when the number of students rather than the number of phrases was used as the unit of analysis. Specifically, 65% of female students raised concerns about relationships with patients compared with 50% of male students (P < 0.01). Results for other variables are shown in Table 1 and were not different for women and men. Again, income and status were mentioned by far fewer students than issues relating to professional or interpersonal relationships.

Results

The Students' Words: Support for the Model

Responses from 249 women and 251 men were analyzed. Students' mean age was 28 years; 38% were married and 17% had children. Thirty-three percent had debt totaling more than $50 000. An ambulatory rotation had been taken by 42% of students. Thirty-eight percent

Our career-choice model (see Table 1) included five factors that affect career choice in internal medicine. Part of the "undeniability" of a qualitative analysis (8, 9) rests with the primary data themselves. The following section provides examples of students' observations and

Figure 1. Sample response to open-ended question that shows bracketing and numbered phrases before coding. dent. All phrases were bracketed, omitting only qualifiers and transitional elements. No paraphrasing was used. During a training period, two independent raters practiced coding the 10% sample of responses to the open question that had not been selected for analysis (practice sample). The trained raters then independently assigned one code to each bracketed phrase in the 500 essay responses chosen for the analysis (Figure 1). Reliability Inter-rater reliability was assessed by evaluating the percent agreement between the two raters within each category of coding. The overall agreement on the five codes was 77.9%, with a kappa value of 0.75. The agreement on each factor individually ranged from 90.8 to 96.4%, with kappa values ranging from 0.61 to 0.85. A third rater did partial coding on 25% of the sample, and a fourth rater was used to arbitrate disagreement if all three raters failed to agree. This rater assigned an entirely new code to a small number of phrases (

27* 20

21* 21

65* 51

50* 48

13 12* 5

17 17* 7

34 26 14

42 30 16

* P < 0.01.

814

Women (n = 249)

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8

Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

suggestions regarding internal medicine. The specific quotes are organized according to model category. Responses were predominantly negative because the openended question asked for suggestions to improve the attractiveness of medicine. Aside from responses about "intellectual stimulation," students made few positive comments. Patient Relationships and Primary Care "The most influential event for me was an elective in outpatient general internal medicine, including offices outside the hospital." "Take a more humanistic approach to patients similar to the family med docs." "In the inpatient setting one gets a skewed impression of the problems internists deal with; i.e. prolonging death instead of extending life." "Dealing with the entire person, not just his kidney, is not rewarded at a place like " "Outpatient work—more needed." "As medical students are encouraged to be more humanistic in their approach, more will enter internal medicine." (The following statements document students' concerns with chronically ill, "difficult" patients. This is a subcategory of the "patient relationship" factor.) "I was frustrated in internal medicine with the overall lack of being able to cure or fix problems." "Chronic nature of disease and my inability to make a difference turned me away." "Some of it is the hopelessness of the patient's situation." "I think more students would choose internal medicine if they were exposed to patients that were not always chronically ill or dying." Learning Climate and Relationships with Attendings and Residents "Unnecessary abuse of the student early on in his clinical experience is all but 'character building,' and in this case fostered contempt for the specialty." "Encourage attendings to abandon humiliation as one of their primary teaching strategies." "My attending was a journal jockey—inflated ego." "Delete malignant attendings." "More motivated teaching!!!!" "Pimping; demoralizing students." "Egotistical attendings who teach by humiliation." "Need role models for women and generalists." "Students made to feel incompetent and burdensome, non-contributing members of the team." "My team was great; good humor, considerate, hard working, extremely intelligent . . .pimping was kept to a bare minimum." Workload and Stress "Residents were all excellent, yet many were negative about their residencies (they didn't seem happy)." "I didn't go into internal medicine because medicine residents and interns, although often brilliant and caring, were almost always miserable, much more than the house officers from any other specialty I saw." "Students and residents are slaves."

"Less abusive training." "Unhappy attending." "Widespread dissatisfaction of faculty." "Inhumane working hours—decrease scut, schedules, on call." "Biggest single factor pushing me away from internal medicine was among interns I worked with in internal medicine clerkship. I met few medicine interns and residents who were happy with their experiences and their career choice." Income and Prestige "I want 150K a year." "Financial rewards for time and effort." "Better pay after residency compared to majority of other fields." "The old story of better compensation for cognitive services." "IM clerkship at this institution seems to reinforce the notion that internal medicine residents and internists are overworked, underpaid, and often underappreciated." Intellectual Stimulation "I have heard colleagues say that they love the underlying principles and the exciting pathophysiology of science." "I enjoy the academic aspect of internal medicine." "Help the patient; don't just be intellectual." "I wouldn't wish a career of mental masturbation on anyone." "Have it be more realistic in its intellectual discussions. Talking about 15 more causes of a disease when the actual cause is fairly common." Students Who Left Internal Medicine Of the 500 students in the sample, 252, or about 50%, had seriously considered a career in internal medicine but switched to another career. Twenty-six percent of the 127 women who had considered internal medicine but switched to other fields ultimately went into family medicine or pediatrics, whereas only 16% of the 125 men who switched went into these other primary care fields (P = 0.052). When psychiatry and obstetrics-gynecology were considered as well as family medicine and general pediatrics, 34% of women compared with 19% of men switched to these fields (P < 0.01). When ultimate career plans were evaluated for the larger sample of the 1244 respondents to the career-choice survey, these trends confirmed a preponderance of women switching to primary care fields (30% of women compared with 15% of men switched to family medicine and general pediatrics, P < 0.0001). Because of female students' affinity for primary care fields, we looked more closely at the qualitative responses of the female students. Comments made by women who switched to pediatrics or family medicine provide insights into their reasons for leaving internal medicine (Table 3). An absence of female role models, a lack of empathy and sense of humor in internal medicine, and the difficulties of balancing a medicine career and family were important concerns.

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8815 Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

Table 3. Experiences of Female Medical Students Who Switched from Internal Medicine to a Primary Care Career in General Pediatrics or Family Medicine "99% of the internists I worked with were very empathic toward patients and families, but were unempathic toward themselves, interns, and residents." "If I went into internal medicine, my satisfactions would have to come from solving problems rather than helping lives." "General lack of humor and compassion compared with family medicine." "I had a great female role model in outpatient internal medicine, but otherwise there were none." "I would never be a competent general internal medicine physician and competent wife and mother, too."

(5%, P < 0.00002). Predicted workload and stress of a residency or career in medicine may therefore underlie the "defection" of large numbers of students to fields such as radiology and anesthesiology.

The following four subgroups are compared in Table 4: 1) students who never considered a career in internal medicine, 2) students who considered and ultimately selected a career in internal medicine, 3) students who considered a career in internal medicine but switched to a primary care field, and 4) students who considered internal medicine but switched to a surgical or nonmedical specialty such as radiology or anesthesiology Three points emerged from this comparison: First, despite an anticipated difference in the ways in which men and women experience medical training, there were many similarities in the frequencies of statements made by men and women within the four subgroups. Thus, strategies for improving the attractiveness of medicine are likely to appeal to both men and women. Second, students who switched to other primary care careers rarely mentioned income and prestige as a reason for leaving medicine, whereas students who selected internal medicine had serious reservations about their future income potential. (Concerns about income were noted in 4% of phrases from women who switched to other primary care fields compared with 27% of phrases from women who stayed in internal medicine [P < 0.00001] and in 8% of phrases from men who switched to other primary care fields compared with 27% of phrases from men who stayed in internal medicine [P < 0.008].) Students who expressed these concerns may define a "high-risk" group that may later leave internal medicine for a different career because of inadequate reimbursement. Third, the workload and stress of a career or residency in internal medicine were mentioned far more frequently by men and women who switched to nonmedical specialties (18%) than by men and women who switched to other primary care careers (5%) (P < 0.02) or by men staying in internal medicine

Discussion After completing a time-consuming, 9-page questionnaire, more than 800 students took the time to write a detailed response to a question related to improving the attractiveness of internal medicine. The method of qualitative analysis allowed these responses to become quantifiable data and the voices of the students to emerge. The message was clear: Students want more ambulatory care experiences ("out of hospital," "real world") and more effective and satisfying relationships with patients during medical training. They also want more respect from their teachers, less stress for themselves as medical housestaff, and greater financial reimbursement for their future efforts. Female students cared more often about relationships established with patients and selected primary care careers than did male students. Finally, even students who chose careers in internal medicine were concerned about the poor training environment, lack of esprit de corps and respect among internists, and, most of all, the inadequate financial reimbursement relative to the reimbursements for competing specialties. What is new in these results? First, many investigators have postulated the findings of our study, but few, if any, have demonstrated them. The use of qualitative analysis preserved the words of the students and thus organized, in a more concrete, vivid way, the flavor of their concerns and the intensity of their comments (8, 9). Second, negative experiences with medical faculty—

Table 4. Percentage of Statements about Attractiveness of Internal Medicine Analyzed by Group Factor

Never Considered a Career in Internal Medicine Women Men (n = 101)t (n = 115)

Selected Internal Medicine as a Career Men Women (n = 172) (n = 210)

>

17

16

20

20

30

31

23

16

14

16

6

12

10

8

9

9

4 4 3

2 10 3

12 27 3

5 27 7

5 4 5

5 8 5

18 16 5

18 16 8

* For example, radiology, anesthesiology, surgical subspecialties. t n refers to the number of statements made by students in each category. t Percentage of statements.

816

Switched to Nonmedical Specialties* Men Women (n = 197) (n = 258)

%i

< Ambulatory care exposure and primary care Attending-student interaction and learning climate Work and stress Income and prestige Intellectual stimulation

Switched from Internal Medicine to Other Primary Care Careers Women Men (n = 105) (n = 62)

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8

Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

not simply the lack of role models but the perceived lack of concern for students' and housestaff's welfare and the hierarchical nature of teaching—may be a crucial factor in losing students to other fields. Third, financial issues finally emerged from the background, perhaps because the open-ended assessment attenuated the social-desirability bias. Financial reimbursement was mentioned less often, however, than other concerns and emerges partly as a compensation for long hours, difficult patients, and a low level of respect. Fourth, our data begin to explain women's affinity for primary care careers (that is, better relationships with patients). Finally, a model of career choice was developed that incorporates five factors that need to be tested in future studies. Importantly, the first factor in the model combines "relationships with patients" with "more ambulatory exposure." This pairing suggests that simply increasing exposure to ambulatory care experiences may be insufficient to attract more students to medicine. Rather, one must also preserve students' sense of engagement with their patients during these ambulatory experiences in order to provide the personal factor that is missing in current inpatient training environments. This idea is consistent with the findings of Lewis and colleagues (1), who studied career satisfaction in more than 1000 practicing internists. In this large survey, the single most satisfying aspect of practice was "relationships with patients" (1). Perhaps the deterioration of the hospital training environment (owing to the "intensivization" of current inpatient wards, as detailed several years ago by Schroeder and colleagues [12]) is a key factor in students' turning away from general internal medicine and toward more procedure-oriented specialties. Negative student-faculty relationships were an unexpected second factor revealed by our analysis. Previous work by our group (6) and others (13-17) has shown the importance of faculty role models (or the lack thereof) in career choice. However, to our knowledge, no other study has shown the vehemence with which the medical students in our survey described their teaching by internal medicine faculty. The Socratic method appears to have gone awry. Whether a cohort effect occurred or teaching effectiveness has declined cannot be determined from our data. We postulate that students' expectations of internal medicine involve images of highly respected, brilliant diagnosticians who are dedicated to patients and students. These images are directly contrary to the technical, non-patient-oriented images associated with the surgical and radiologic specialties. Students' actual training experiences may contradict their images of internal medicine, causing an unsettling sense of disparity. Although our open question was not phrased such that we might have determined whether medicine teachers were worse than instructors in other disciplines, it is clear that students have many angry feelings about the way in which they are taught internal medicine. In a system where unsatisfying relationships are established with hopelessly ill inpatients, the types of teaching behaviors students described may be intolerable. Indeed, many other fields court students. Students wrote of a sense of being "wanted" by other disci-

plines, of being treated better right from the start of other rotations and at interviews for residencies. They are lured away from a career in medicine by promises of "controllable lifestyles" (2), less stressful residencies, challenging cases with surgical cures, or, finally, markedly increased income and status. Our data document that financial rewards do matter to students, and, as recent editorials suggest (18, 19), increased income for internal medicine (or decreased salaries for the competing professions) would "level the playing field." However, as society grapples with income disparities, the written words of our students imply that medicine would be a far more attractive field if student-patient and student-faculty relationships were improved and if the medical residency were made a less stressful, "miserable" experience. Lack of attention to these three factors will probably lead to decision making driven by the next factor in the model-that is, income and prestige. It may be a balancing of the multiple factors in the model that ultimately determines a student's career choice. Internal medicine also loses many students to other primary care fields (family medicine and general pediatrics) with low pay and prestige. As shown in Table 4, these students have serious concerns about the lack of exposure to ambulatory care experiences during medical school and the lack of relationships with patients. However, they have few concerns about income or prestige. Women were predominant in this group and chose primary care careers more often than did men. Although the affinity of women for primary care has been noted before, recent theoretical formulations of women's psychological development (10, 11) suggest that women place a high value on relationships with others and therefore may report a greater interest in patients than their male counterparts (1, 15, 17-27). Our data imply that the lack of relationships with patients may be a pivotal factor in the eventual career choice of women in medicine. Our results should be viewed with some caution. Although financial issues finally emerged as a factor, social desirability might have prevented them from assuming even greater importance. Students were not asked to compare the problems of internal medicine with the problems in other fields; thus, although we know that students perceived medical faculty as arrogant and humiliating, we do not know if they are more arrogant or humiliating than other faculty. (We postulate that the students did not expect the internal medicine faculty to be that way and thus were disappointed.) We did not assess the roles of other external factors (such as peer pressure, family, and religion) in determining career choice. These factors have been shown to be important determinants of educational outcomes (28), and the way in which our question was phrased did not elicit responses that would speak to these various issues. Nevertheless, students have given us ample evidence that there are problems with the medical training environment and have indicated how we might address these concerns. Students want more ambulatory training with continuity experiences. Curricula need to be developed to teach students how to relate to chronically ill, "difficult" patients and to derive satisfaction from

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8 817 Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

caring for patients rather than curing them (29). Faculty development programs (30) and formal evaluation mechanisms should be instituted so that negative interactions between students and faculty can be identified and corrected. The nature of stressors and the workload of medical residencies should continue to be evaluated and addressed, and career satisfaction among primary care internists should be studied so that strategies to improve the satisfaction of practicing physicians can be constructed. Financial incentives need to be put in place. Money is a sign of respect, and the students recognize a lack of respect in the income disparities among medical specialties. Finally, the concern that women have for fostering better relationships with patients suggests that they may lead the way in the recent push toward generalist careers. The interest of all students in developing better relationships with patients serves both the public and the profession well. We must recognize the importance of these concerns and safeguard the development of these relationships if we are to retain and recruit physicians into internal medicine. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the American College of Physicians or the American Board of Internal Medicine. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Nancy Dean for expert assistance with manuscript preparation; Drs. Howard Beckman, Linda Grant, and Richard Ryan for critical review of earlier versions of the manuscript; Lisa Borchetta and Catherine Feuer for data transcription and entry; Dr. Jean Baker Miller for help with model development; Dr. Adina Kalet for valuable input during early stages of this study. Requests for Reprints: Drs. Julia McMurray and Mark Linzer: Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, J5/210, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. Grant Support: In part by grants from the American College of Physicians and the American Board of Internal Medicine. Current Author Addresses: Dr. McMurray: Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, J5/210, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. Dr. Schwartz: Department of Medicine, Gouveraeur Hospital, 227 Madison Street, Room 479, New York, NY 10002. Dr. Genero: Department of Psychology, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02181. Dr. Linzer: Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, J5/210, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. References 1. Lewis CE, Prout D, Chalmers EP, Leake B. How satisfying is the practice of internal medicine? A national survey. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:1-5. 2. Colwill JM. Where have all the primary care applicants gone? N Engl J Med. 1992;326:387-93. 3. Funkenstein DH. Medical Students, Medical Schools, and Society during Given Eras: Factors Affecting the Career Choices of Physicians, 1958-1976. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger; 1978.

818

4. Roos NP, Fish DG. Change in career preferences: students as a group compared with students as individuals. J Med Educ. 1974;49: 1057-9. 5. Perricone PJ. Social concern in medical students: a reconsideration of the Eron assumption. J Med Educ. 1974;49:541-6. 6. Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead E. Medical student interest in internal medicine. Initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Interest Group Survey on Factors Influencing Career Choice in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:6-15. 7. Becker J, Geer B. The fate of idealism in medical school. Am Soc Rev. 1958;23:50-6. 8. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1984. 9. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. 10. Baker-Miller J . Towards a New Psychology of Women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1976. 11. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1982. 12. Schroeder SA, Showstack JA, Gerbert B. Residency training in internal medicine: time for a change? Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:55461. 13. Clark EJ, Rieker PP. Gender differences in relationships and stress of medical and law students. J Med Educ. 1986;61:32-40. 14. Eccles JS. Gender roles and women's achievement. Education Researcher 1986;15:15-9. 15. Shumway JM, Powers RL, D'Alessandri RM, Finucane TM. The medical clerkship and factors influencing career choice in internal medicine [Abstract]. Clin Research. 1988;36:736A. 16. Bean B, Kitter LH. Helping and achieving. Compatible or competing goals for men and women in medical school? Soc Sci Med. 1982;6:1377-82. 17. Grant L. The gender climate of medical school: perspectives of women and men students. J Am Med Worn Assoc. 1988;43:109-19. 18. Levinsky NG. Recruiting for primary care. N Engl J Med. 1993;328: 654-60. 19. Kassirer J P . Primary care and the affliction of internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:648-50. 20. Bowman MW, Gehlbach SH. Sex of the physician as a determinant of psychosocial problem recognition. J Fam Pract. 1980;10:655-9. 21. Leserman J. Men and Women in Medical School. New York: Praeger; 1981. 22. Maheux B, Dufort F, Beland F. Professional and sociopolitical attitudes of medical students: gender differences reconsidered. J Am Med Worn Assoc. 1988;43:73-6. 23. Bluestone NR. The future impact of women physicians on American medicine. Am J Public Health. 1978;68:760-2. 24. Kris KB. Developmental strains of women medical students. J Am Med Worn Assoc. 1985;43:77-84. 25. McGrath E, Zimet CN. Female and male medical students: differences in specialty choice selection and personality. J Med Educ. 1977;52:293-300. 26. Calkins E, Willoughby T, Arnold L. Gender and psychosocial factors associated with specialty choice. J Am Med Worn Assoc. 1987;42:170-2. 27. Langwell KM. Factors affecting the incomes of men and women physicians: further explorations. J Hum Res. 1982;17:261-75. 28. Cremins L. Family community linkages in American education. Teacher's College Record. 1978;79:683-704. 29. Drossman DA. The problem patient. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:36672. 30. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Berman J, Berger MR. Improving clinical teaching: evaluation of a national dissemination program. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1156-61.

15 October 1993 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 119 • Number 8

Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Penn State University Hershey User on 02/21/2016

Smile Life

When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile

Get in touch

© Copyright 2015 - 2024 PDFFOX.COM - All rights reserved.