THE CASE AGAINST THE ALEXAN [PDF]

^s/n

Date:

Committee

Submitted in Council File No Item No.

h>

lM &—

I"*-"_______ __

CWnv\w^,| CJ^-h ■ F i.OS 4NGEi.ES A.

AftAS '0 WHICH T-4E DESIGN SUlOE A^PUES f £lAT OSSMP TO OTMES REGUUTIONS

'*»♦ C^6wn 0*t-fir l»i

-la"!. ^♦urn

Ihe ar«s shiwn Dr F flow 11 *

Lrb*n D»«igr Standard© *nd G»;d*!m»c i '0*e

ipV^wtii ht’\ri ,■ ipj.' r/irlr p'rtii

. »rph*m *">

fTi\»r*i in

*u»pt

P»/»'WSMJf d! ek>Wl«ef

>‘g*\C) 6«»‘! (»•• »

Kttftra* rotnuott dowim****

vH«*« •.*»•'• I* »€OH*>M ~ cisaptr-- i* it*

Fla* -m tn» M^de^ai o $ lllrlrf ,|-l

Tl|l' »il Jn IH III'ml ll'' T-Hl'ai't

I llfatrl

uHiZec sirs ol’C'3 the patent a for a a g ificar l amount af ul ire nrv corviualw p oicelc bach -c# stiuctoic arorac a- oapjrten ty tc inpatamsrV 01 do- r to-n _o: c igsiss The- utvt Mtirts w Sira1#;* P*in leccgr iye d :ns anc emehas ceo toe reed to* a ca a-ice ce^een pmsverrtlvn ar.d "S I* cjnst ueiian. s atirij Enc:u(ag? f ns gra ned m xsd ace n In pioiest: eroin: cicninta it histone buiUlrq; Lslaol ah i.rbsn dcs g" g *4 ,ica Ena :ct up prcecrv^licn pnontica that st te a balance DSt..:e

he,lone p esernatraa and icr devetep-

lltnili! "

Air-mrrnu*!. Rf-h'i-Ti Guo

t

NEW KEY ! POINTS jt

CONSTRUCTION

overview

Ne^ additions, extenor alterations or related new con­ struction should not destroy historic mater als, features, and spatial relationships that characterize a building or historic d strict. The new work should be differentiated from the ola yet be compatible with the historic materials features, size, scale and proportions, and massing to pro­ tect the integrity of the property and the environment

(Secretary 's Standard Numoer 9)

* ■ ■

264'

HEIGHT

246'

HEIGHT **

■« ~ SNi ■. n M r:

a I mil

n mh

Hill* :

■

*

3

*

? t*. tt i u- gm * *«* m. »mm * til *11 tfii «u£

* *I ’(Wd'iltFM tfw titHK * • *1 ** *».> - ..IM I » * “W *

* ’;»»

CURRENTLY ENTITLED PROJECT

320' HEIGHT RT n=

—1

~_

264' HEIGHT

-m jM

Jr • n

*"Tjj “ H ■M hi »'W

mm\..

ALEXAN PROJECT